Login:
Password:

Apple Backtracks on iTunes Music Sharing

By Nate Mook, BetaNews

May 27, 2003, 8:23 PM

Amid pressure from its music industry partners, Apple has disabled a controversial feature in iTunes 4 that enables the program to share songs with other iTunes users over the Internet.

Apple removed the ability in a small update to iTunes, which also corrects a volume limiter bug and touts improved performance. Version 4.0.1 can, however, still share music between users on the same local network via Rendezvous.

Controversy swirled around the sharing functionality after users began to bypass limitations built into iTunes. Although iTunes itself does not allow copying of music shared by others, developers quickly analyzed the protocol and released programs that could download music directly from iTunes music shares.

While many applications sport the ability to share files and the techniques employed by iTunes simply utilize HTTP, the ease in which users could distribute music sparked a media frenzy and comparisons to the launch of Napster.

After Web sites cropped up containing vast listings of iTunes shares accessible over the Internet, Apple opted to keep the legal hounds leashed, simply stating iTunes "is not meant to be used in any other way than for personal use."

Such file sharing may not have been a major concern for Apple in the past, but the launch of the iTunes Music Store has placed the company in a delicate position with its major record label partners that supply music for the service. Songs purchased from Apple's iTunes Music Store can only be read on authorized computers, however, and were not at risk for being shared.

In order to encourage users to upgrade to the new iTunes release, Apple has tweaked its file sharing protocol to prevent version 4.0 from communicating with 4.0.1.

But the iTunes 4.0.1 update is not likely to quell the efforts of curious minds wanting to take advantage of Apple's easy to use protocol. Developers have already begun to create workarounds for the new restrictions, such as fooling iTunes into thinking Internet traffic is originating from a local network.

Add a Comment (13 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By zhanghenihao

posted Nov 12, 2008 - 3:39 AM

thank you for http://www.wow-powerleveling-wow.com/ wow gold
http://www.powerleveling-wowgold.com/ wow gold
they serve me ,i really said that thanks

Score: 0

By n1ckster

posted Jun 3, 2003 - 7:57 AM

I feel sorry for all u mac users being restricted like this.
Its like having big brother looking out for you.

Roll on Imesh and Kazza for the mac these are great sources for lots of legal good music and an easy resource to get backups of your own music and videos, who cares if people sample music for free. I record off the radio am i breaking the law? (people have been doing this for many years) hopefully the choice we all have to share files or not will never be stopped, it will be a sad day if it does.

Have fun and remember to share ;).

Score: 0

By atkfrg56

posted Jun 1, 2003 - 8:52 PM

As I am concerned, piracy of music will never be stopped. As long as the government or gestapo music industry companies do not try to collect all of our microphones and tape recorders we will be able to copy anything we hear and play it back. With even older computers we can use a mic and record sounds into traditional .wav and .aiff formats and pass them along. The only debate is if we will be able to use .mp3 and new formats to send and receive music or resort to traditional methods.

Score: 0

By xwtx

posted May 28, 2003 - 11:34 AM

good to see they acted quickly to shut out the freeloaders who, once again, ruined a good thing for the honest users out there.

Score: 0

By wnowak1

posted May 29, 2003 - 7:53 AM

who ruined what? free swapping programs like kazaa do not charge money, so no one ruined anything for you mac users. This is the first successful money charging program. If anything was ruined it was because mpaa and its allies. Besides, this is targeted for mac users only since kazaa is not available for os x and itunes is not available for windows. Even when a version of "itunes" with an online store does come to windows, it will not be as popular or scucessful as mac's music store is. The fact of the matter is, there will always be file sharing programs (and there are tons)or ways to bypass security.

Score: 0

By xwtx

posted May 29, 2003 - 10:32 AM

thank you for proving my point.

Score: 0

By wnowak1

posted May 29, 2003 - 10:52 AM

hmm...

who do you consider ruining what exactly...thats what I'm trying to figure out.

Score: 0

By xwtx

posted May 29, 2003 - 1:19 PM

people who take a good thing (online streaming of music to other computers) and make software that allows you to COPY the songs to your mac instead of simply listening to it.

the original idea was that basically you could share your music with macs on your LAN or listen to mp3s at work streamed from your mac at home.

but, like i said, you can always count on people to think that it's their "right" to take what isn't theirs.

Score: 0

By Aranach

posted Jun 4, 2003 - 9:03 AM

If it was only intended to allow streaming across a local network then why was any broader streaming power included in the first place? If it were truly the case that only local streaming was intended then it wouldn't have been released otherwise and there wouldn't be a fuss now.

I ask you where the problem in copying lies as opposed to just streaming? If you know that a source will always be online and you can just stream whatever song you want from them, whenever you want it, well, where's the difference from actually having a local copy? You won't pay for the music if you have a reliable stream source any more than you'd pay for it if you had it local; the difference in availability would not differ. If you'd pay for it based on your frequency of streaming it then you're probably the type that would pay for it based on having downloaded it for free.

Where's the difference I see? I see bandwidth usage. Reliable streams were probably generating a good deal of traffic. Why should perfectly good bandwidth go to waste restreaming a few songs to the same people who were just listening to somebody else's shares over and over again? Why would it be worse to move the file once instead of many times? Either way somebody's freeloading. Give the people who actually copied the music credit for not sucking up people's bandwidth all the time. Those who just restream any time they want to listen to a song they haven't legally downloaded are making no more money for the RIAA than actual pirates, are no more likely to legally download the song given a good stream compared to having it local, and are eating away at any number of providers' bandwidth at the same time.

All this update does is drive people to other sources and clean up the problem of bandwidth abuse by people who didn't want to illegally download music to their drive but had no problems listening to that music on demand from another source for free.

Score: 0

By nate

posted May 28, 2003 - 7:56 PM

What about the honest folks that simply wanted an efficient way to listen to their legally purchased music while away from their Mac? Although I guess Apple would tell those users to shell out the cash for an iPod :)

Score: 0

By xwtx

posted May 28, 2003 - 10:25 PM

haha, probablly.

it does suck for the honest guys and gals that were using the sharing to use their library @ work or somewhere else. unfortunately, they had to do what they did though. maybe there will be some sort of compromise soon - like only "authorized" macs can view shared files - like the mac that you have authorized for the iTunes music store can view any other mac that is authorized w/ the same apple ID.

Score: 0

By nate

posted May 29, 2003 - 12:23 AM

That would be an excellent compromise. Nonetheless, I have a feeling we will see services popping up pretty soon that bypass even the current restrictions.

This is a good read if you are interested in the DAAP protocol: http://tapjam.net/daap/draft.html

Score: 0

By bigshotshotdown

posted May 27, 2003 - 10:00 PM

Looks like the big Apple is getting a bite taken out of it's a$$!

Score: 0