Adobe: Pros Like Lightroom Better

By Ed Oswald | Published October 17, 2007, 11:54 AM

Professional photographers are about four times as likely to use Lightroom versus Apple's competing application Aperture, Adobe's Photoshop product manager said Tuesday.

According to data compiled by research firm InfoTrends, Aperture's market share in the segment stands at about 5.5 percent. The rest are using some type of Adobe product: 66.5 percent use the PhotoShop Camera Raw plug-in, and 23.6 percent use Lightroom.

Aperture was the first to come out with its professional photo tool in October 2005. Adobe responded in January of 2006, releasing a beta of Lightroom (the official version didn't appear until February of this year.)

Comparisons between Apple and Adobe may be a little unfair to Cupertino: even long before Lightroom, the company's Photoshop program was widely considered a standard-bearer for photo editing.

However, it shows what a steep hill the program has to climb. Mac users seem to also be choosing Lightroom over Aperture -- the survey found Adobe's program leading in market share 26.6 to 14.3 percent.

"Lightroom is clearly off to a tremendous start, and everyone here is really pleased & grateful to the photography community for such a warm welcome," Photoshop product manager John Nack said in a blog post.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

I use Lightroom regularly and love it. I have a few complaints, but for the most part it is fast and simple to use. Adobe did a great job with this program. If only they could remake their PDF Reader fast and nimble once again...

Score: 0

|

close tags!

Score: 0

|

It's funny that LR has such a lead, considering the fact that Aperture is a HUGE 4GB+ program. LR on the other hand is small, light and fast. Well, all power to you Adobe ;)

Score: 0

|

apple also canned the team responsible for aperture because they did such a poor job with it (rumor TS: http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0604aperture.html ) so I'll hold judgement until the next release is launched.

Score: 0

|

A real beta process at work: Mozilla fires up Firefox 3.6 Beta 2

In the clearest sign yet that public input really does help the development process, a flurry of bug detections provoked Mozilla to release Beta 2 of the next Firefox.

Snow Leopard and Windows 7 still can't crack the netbook problem

Apple has killed Atom support in OS X 10.6.2 and Windows 7 Starter Edition is stripped of "basic" functionality.

Microsoft's Top 3 advances in Exchange Server 2010

The latest round of changes launched today will impact how admins deliver services to e-mail recipients, and how much companies will pay along the way.

Firefox turns five: Thanks for giving us a choice

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: No longer the phoenix rising from the ashes, Mozilla has carried on more than just Netscape's legacy.

Kindle for PC opens in beta, underwhelms

Amazon has opened the beta of Kindle for PC, a companion to the Kindle, but little else.

European ministers approve watered-down 'neutral net' language

The latest provision in the EU's telecoms regulatory framework would let businesses cancel individuals' Internet access, if they go to court first.

It's the US vs. the EU over Oracle+Sun and the meaning of 'open source'

Now that the EU is a virtual country, the US Justice Dept. is taking a stand in favor of its view -- and against the EC's -- that MySQL will survive under Oracle.

Qualcomm: $1.3 billion Samsung licensing deal unrelated to fair trade violations

Samsung has come to a 15-year licensing deal with Qualcomm over 3G and 4G wireless technology.

Nokia's 'limited number' of recalled chargers exceeds 14 million

Today, the Finnish phone maker has begun a recall of mobile phone chargers that are a shock hazard.

Ubuntu 9.10 upgraders report frustration

For those Wine aficionados out there, beware of the remote possibility that your Linux system could be infected by Windows-seeking malware.

Supreme Court considers patentability of abstract methods today

Can software that executes a formula for a business process qualify for federal patents? An appeals court already said no, and inventors are making their case.