Beta 2 of Windows for supercomputers arrives
By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published May 20, 2008, 11:59 AM
One month ahead of the next round of Top 500 supercomputer rankings, Microsoft has released online its Beta 2 for its high-performance data center version of Windows. But is Windows accelerating fast enough to keep up with Linux clusters?
Windows has historically not been considered the fastest operating system among supercomputers, but there is no doubt it's working to climb the ladder. Microsoft's best performing trial supercomputer to date has been given the nickname "Rainier." It's a cluster of Dell PowerEdge 1855 blades, which are currently running Microsoft's latest test builds of HPC Server 2008 -- its successor to Compute Cluster Server 2003.
In June of 2007, Rainier placed #106 on the University of Mannheim's Top 500 supercomputers list, with a peak performance (Rmax) ranking of just under 9 teraflops. In just five months' time, Microsoft's later builds helped the same system accelerate to 11.75 teraflops, though that boost was pretty much in line with its competition: it placed #116 on the November 2007 list.
The big improvement Microsoft is trying to build -- maybe as important, at least, as being faster -- is making feasible an easily administered system. Taking some cues from its latest improvements to the admin console for Windows Server 2008, Microsoft is adding an Outlook-like front end to HPC Server, which unlike almost any other Microsoft product is apparently keeping its nickname: "Cluster Rocket" will serve as the main admin control panel, giving data cluster admins access to tools such as temperature maps, network configuration maps, and failover clustering itineraries.

And for anyone -- especially in academia -- who preferred Linux because the command line seemed more "native" somehow, HPC Server throws in PowerShell -- the tool that reduces colossal scripts to two or three lines of code.
But the real tale of the tape for HPC Server could come next month, when Mannheim U. reveals its latest semi-annual Top 500 results. Microsoft appears to be setting a benchmark for itself for 30% performance improvement with each new list, which would help it keep pace with the rest of the industry. Any less than that amount, and academic customers could fail to be impressed.
BETACHECK
For more: Microsoft HPC Server 2008 Technical Overview. .DOC format file from Microsoft.com.
Top 500 list for November 2007 from the University of Mannheim.
How does 11.75 teraflops compare on an even playing field? Rainier has 2,048 Intel processors. The Maui High Performance Computing Center, an Air Force-managed research center at the University of Hawaii, claims to be running a 5,120 processor cluster of Dell PowerEdge 1855 blades, running Linux. Although it's not officially chronicled on the Top 500 list, MHPCC boasts an Rmax score of 64.2 teraflops, which would put it at about #13 if it were a Top 500 participant.
With all that horsepower Windows will be able to bluescreen faster than ever.
Score: 0
|but will it work on a Mac?
Score: 0
|;( -great.
does it come with beta aspirin for the superheadache?
Score: 0
|can it run crysis ???
Score: 0
|hell yeah
Score: 0
|A preview of Windows 7, requiring a supercomputer just to boot.
Score: 0
|bahahahahahaha that was so funny. not.
Score: 0
|With all that horsepower, Windows will be able to set new records for time to bluescreen.
Score: 0
|Not sure if it's just me, but I don't know when the last blue screen I have seen, or any critical error. Using Vista x64. XP I still see them all the time.
Score: 0
|Me neither. Server 2003 is a solid OS that I have yet to blue screen, and I use it as my workstation OS.
The only issue I have with 2003 is the ability for the DNS server to take down AD when it gets corrupt, but that's another issue. I have since rectified this problem when I have encountered it but know others whom have not been so lucky.
This is a logical step for Microsoft to take and if nothing else will get the nix lovers something to bleat about.
Score: 0
|Just yesterday when waking the laptop from sleep - completely unexpected. Don't see a blue screen but says so sure enough in the problem report...
Score: 0
|I agree completely about Windows Server 2003... a very solid offering from Microsoft. That's why I used Windows XP Professional x64 for so long... the Server 2003 code base made a tremendous difference in the performance and reliability.
Score: 0
|Further to my post, Cray Appears at number 9-10 and further up under the SGI umbrella. Message to Microsoft, "this could take some time"
Score: 0
|Prehaps Microsoft want to get windows consumer editions working properly first, before delving into an area they have no real track record in.
Besides all ealse whatever they churn out I dont beleive will match the high end Cray systems running CrayOS. The late great Seymor Cray would laugh his tits off I`m sure.
Good Microsoft is making an effort, but prehaps too little too late as our there search engine technologies.
Score: 0
|I don't know what to do ... answer it or correct all the mistakes.
Score: 0
|ESL, perhaps? Or just a much maligned (and apparently rightly so) ejookayshunal system?
Score: 0
|"HPC Server throws in PowerShell -- the tool that reduces colossal scripts to two or three lines of code." -- I wish I had such a positive view of PowerShell. I compliment Microsoft on a lot, but PowerShell isn't one of them. Maybe its just me though.
Score: 0
|Why don't you like powershell? I love the new scripting system...it's about time they released something like this!
Score: 0
|