Corel: ODF is One Choice Among Many
By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published December 1, 2006, 6:17 PM
(continued from previous page)
One of WordPerfect Office X3's key selling points, since its introduction last January, has been that it can be adapted for use in multiple modes. It has a "standard" mode of operation, a "classic" mode (with the white-on-blue text that was the hallmark of WordPerfect during the 1980s), a "legal" mode for the product's many loyal law office clients, and a mode that essentially mimics Microsoft Word 2003.
As Corel's Richard Carriere said then, this was done in order to give Corel a way to introduce its product into enterprises where users are already trained on Word 2003, without having to retrain them or change their way of work.
It could very well be the feature that keeps WordPerfect hanging on. Though still considered a distant second in the market - many services long ago stopped measuring the relative state of word processors - WordPerfect fights for every user it can get, and doesn't mind bending over backwards to do so. It's no longer the standard bearer, Carriere freely admitted then, so it cannot afford to alienate its user by offering risky alternatives that could, at best, be supported by a measurable minority of the IT workforce.
But with Microsoft having overhauled its usage model entirely for Office 2007, WordPerfect faces a kind of crossroads: Conceivably, if it were to continue to offer an Office 2003 mode, it could address disaffected Microsoft customers who aren't willing to undergo extensive retraining. On the other hand, if businesses are sold on the "ribbon" and other new functionality enhancements, WordPerfect might not be able to afford looking like the "old school" alternative.
"I think it's a little too early to say whether or not we want to embrace a look and feel that's close to the ribbon that Microsoft is about to introduce," Carriere told BetaNews on Friday. "The user reaction will dictate, pretty much, what we want to do. But one thing is sure: When we are adopting new changes to the look and feel of our application, we want to give users the choice."
In the same way that users can choose one of four modes of work, he said, Corel would prefer to retain the option of adding a fifth mode, if possible, rather than force a new modus operandi upon its customers - and, in so doing, jeopardize its entire value proposition. "We will look at the reactions of users and the interests in this way to work," he said, "and if and when it becomes relevant, [that's] when we will make a decision around adding or not a new way to work."
Microsoft could make that decision even more complicated. Though it has announced its willingness to license its look and feel to other vendors for free, the guidelines which those licensees must follow may be extremely strict, probably not allowing them to utilize a ribbon-like look and feel as an alternative usage mode. But whether Microsoft even has the right to dictate terms on those levels, may be a subject of very substantive debate in the near future. For now, Corel is declining to take sides on that debate, pending a thorough review of the circumstances.
If Microsoft attempts to hold a tight rein over how its look and feel is used by others (the way Apple tried to do two decades earlier), the result could be that more users will be prompted to defect from the Microsoft camp, supporting the strongest alternative they can find. Could this be WordPerfect's opportunity to become the champion of the oppressed?
As the very pragmatic, always diplomatic, though never ambiguous Richard Carriere put it...no. "If some organization wants to make a political statement, we're probably not the right partner to do that," he told BetaNews, "because we've made the conscious decision to help organizations not go in one direction from which they might not easily pull themselves out. So in that sense, I'm totally comfortable. However, [if you're] an organization...that wants to push an agenda, let's say, with ODF...in plain language, by going with a solution like ours, you're still covering your rear end, because if things don't go the way you expect, then you always have an exit option that you might not have otherwise."
So WordPerfect goes forth - cautiously, judiciously, without even a hint of belligerence, carefully collecting every conceivable alternative to Microsoft Word it can find, including a work-alike mode, and combining them all into a comprehensive, pragmatic, though cohesive concept. Corel didn't embrace ODF this week to strike a chord of dissent. All it wants is harmony, and to secure its place as one of its components.
It is intresting that the MS format is promoted defensive.
Score: 0
|Corel is making a smart move for once, even though WordPerfect was doomed the day Word 6.0 hit the shelves. And it won't gain market share by copying Microsoft's Ribbon, whatever a court says about that issue in the future. The growing popularity of OpenOffice and sustained user base of Microsoft Office will keep WordPerfect as an anachronism.
But the fact is the OASIS OpenDocument format is a future-proof international standard for office software (ISO/IEC 26300), and it puts StarOffice/OpenOffice in the driver's seat with regard to the stronger file format, notably relative to business, government, and academia.
No matter how much you love Microsoft (I'm not shy about my fanboy fawns), in the face of Microsoft's policy of personal PC intrusion via WGA/OGA, Activation/Validation schemas, open source provides the one thing we all want: CONTROL over our data that is not owned, licensed, sold, and comes complete with a kill-switch by a corporation. I'm not talking about the merits of whether the StarOffice/OpenOffice "suite" is better than MS Office 2007, but rather their respective file formats. Office's OpenXML reinvents the wheel in so many instances that it's really rather silly. One prime example of such meddling is the built-in (or left in?) inaccuracies and incredible blunders to citations in Word 2007 (a caveat to students everywhere not to use that feature).
Score: 0
|Not that what Corel says matters at all, but ODF is a doomed "standard". Why? Because MS has their own and IT will be THE standard. Why? One word:
Office.
End of discussion.
Score: 0
|Microsoft is making Word ODF compatible also so that argument is out the window.
Score: 0
|Probably one of the most clueless comments Ive read in quite some time.
ODF covers spreadsheets, documents, databases, presentations and such.
Office isnt a standard. Office is a suite of applications. Microsoft has funded the development of the plugins to use with its Office suite, and its free and open source (hosted on sourceforge) It will be compatible with every component, making it "comatible" if you will, with the likes of KOffice, StarOffice, OpenOffice, and now WordPefect.
Choice is a beautiful thing.
Score: 0
|The growing popularity of linux on desktop brings openoffice, koffice and other alternatives among everyday users and small businesses.
Why should I pay for software when I just need to send/receive mails, print papers, write texts etc...? I can get all for free!
As an example, we use Openoffice on 17 computers here at work because it gives us all we need. So the money saved on office software has been invested in better equipment.
So ODF has all the chances to become a popular standard. Microsoft will not anymore fully dominate the market of office aplications as it was 5-10 years ago, because users now have the choice, and use what they want to and not what they have to.
IT will not be THE standardm anymore, the time of do(c)mination has come to an end :)
Score: 0
|Via a ten-stage plug-in export process, hardly transparent.
Score: 0
|Like everything Microsoft does.
Score: 0
|