Critical Features Cut from Windows Server Virtualization
By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published May 10, 2007, 3:17 PM
Facing what he called "universal truths about product development," Microsoft general manager for virtualization strategy Mike Neil concluded a multi-page blog post this afternoon touting the progress made with Windows Server Virtualization, code-named "Viridian," by announcing the removal of three of the service's most highly anticipated features: live migration of running virtual machines between servers; "hot-adds" of virtual components such as storage, processors, and memory; and support for more than 16 logical processing cores.
"With all this progress comes the occasional tradeoff," Neil wrote this afternoon. "Earlier this week we had to come to grips with some universal truths about product development: *) Shipping is a feature, too; *) The quality bar, the time you have, and the feature set are directly correlated."
While last month's delay was explained as having been necessary to enable these features to be fully developed, Neil today explained the cuts as necessary in order to ship the product on time.
In last month's explanation of Viridian's delay until the second half of the year, he wrote, "Why the schedule change to the beta of Windows Server virtualization? The primary drivers are around meeting our internal goals for performance and scalability. In an IT environment of ever-growing multi-core processor systems, Windows Server virtualization is being designed to scale across a much broader range of systems than the competition. We're designing Windows Server virtualization to scale up to 64 processors, which I'm proud to say is something no other vendor's product supports. We are also providing a much more dynamic VM environment with hot-add of processors, memory, disk and networking as well a greater scalability with more SMP support and memory."
Contrast that statement with Neil's post this afternoon, which states his team made a strategic decision to focus on what customers really need, which led to excising the excess scalability.
"We adjusted the feature set of Windows Server virtualization so that we can deliver a compelling solution for core virtualization scenarios while holding true to desired timelines," Neil wrote today. "Windows Server virtualization is a core OS technology for the future, and we chose to focus on virtualization scenarios that meet the demands of the broad market - enterprise, large organizations, and mid-market customers."
Neil did make clear, however, that the first public beta of Viridian will be made available in the second half of 2007, in keeping with the release-to-manufacturing for Windows Server "Longhorn," and that a production edition would be available within 180 days after that. However, Microsoft spokespersons decline to acknowledge that Longhorn's RTM date will be in the second half of the year, despite statements that the Viridian beta will be released in the second half of the year.
The removal of these features comes just days before the start of Microsoft's WinHEC conference in Los Angeles. There, several demos remain on the schedule, including public demos of the very features Microsoft has chosen to cut. Neil said today the company still plans to include these features in a future Windows Server Virtualization release, though the code-name "Viridian" was not used in that sentence.
What would these features have actually provided that's so important? Architects of large enterprise networks are looking for ways to simplify their logical structure. Just because they end up using multiple processors distributed geographically in far-flung locations, should not mean they have to build complex domains and, in Windows terminology, forests of domains just to make everything work together.
A virtual server environment would enable a broad array of processors to function jointly as a single entity from a logical perspective, simplifying the job of managing applications and functions enormously. But for large networks, this may only be feasible if the virtual entity can scale among a large number of processors, and do so "on the fly," whenever it needs to.
A 16 logical processor limitation will restrict a Viridian virtual server to only four quad-core processors, which could effectively box it in within a 4P server. What's more, if you can't add processors and memory on the fly, as they become available, you can't subtract them either, which will probably mean that for virtual servers distributed across multiple physical processors, little can be done to rescue the VM if one processor goes down.
One feature that apparently will remain in Viridian is the "snapshot" feature, which enables a virtual server to be backed up in its entirety, and reverted to if an experiment or other circumstance causes the virtual server to be unusable. 64-bit VMs will also continue to be supported.
5:09 pm May 10, 2007 - After reading this story, a Microsoft spokesperson officially reversed repeated declines by the company to officially set a timeframe for Longhorn's release to manufacturing - despite apparent references to it as a relative milestone for other products and services such as Viridian - by saying indeed, Longhorn will RTM in the second half of 2007.
The RTM date has also appeared incidentally in recent press releases, the spokesperson reminded us.
Did he really use smileys? It may be a blog post, but I don't think that's the right tone for this sort of announcement!
Score: 0
|ah b****es
Score: 0
|Microsoft has lost its edge, I guess those $20 a week programmers overseas aren't working out for Microshaft?
Score: 0
|Overpromise and underdeliver...
Are you surprised at this after seeing what happened to VISTA?
Come on.
Score: 0
|"What happened to the UDERPROMISE - OVERDELIVER philosophy"
Maybe they did underpromise, but then rather than overdelivering, or even delivering on the underpromise, they underdelivered their underpromise. Confused?
Score: 0
|OverPromise - hyperUnderDeliver - HyperHype
that's their motto, shh, it is supposed to be a secret!
Score: 0
|Can Microsoft actually deliver on anything anymore?
With all these cutbacks, by the time this thing ships all you'll actually get in the box is a license agreement.
Score: 0
|This is just another in a long line of disappointing MS press releases over recent years - but they do seem to have a history of positive and negative spells.
Things can only get better? I hope so. They need some big, and positive news to keep the faith.
Score: 0
|What happened to the UDERPROMISE - OVERDELIVER philosophy? Guys you're really needs some changes in the development process (overall), I hope you're working on that. Being the "man" on channel 9 videos and conferences is one thing, but what are counts at the end of the day is the product you're working on, not how cool are you at the front of the camera. These are also some “universal truths about product development…” wake up, please, and learn from the Visual Studio & SQL Server team, they are recently the only ones performing well at Microsoft. Good luck.
Score: 0
|I don't think Longhorn has any features left...
Score: 0
|Its almost mid-2007 and Microsoft is still on the 2001-started "Longhorn" project. MS, focus well in the future on what should be your most important products (Windows client and server) and then do Zune, Windows Live and Google "me too" competition.
Score: 0
|Ironic that most successful developers learned long ago to "under promise, over deliver", yet Microsoft seems to have never heard of it.
Score: 0
|What's that, a longhorn product having features cut? never!
Score: 0
|Which one is better: be secretive like Apple and keep "top secret" features until last few months before launch
OR
announce the features years ahead and risk not being able to include all the features in the final product?
Score: 0
|From a PR perspective, and considering their competition is *extremely* far ahead of them in this game?
The former would likely have been a better choice.
They cannot release this without live migration or hot-adds and hope to compete. It's product suicide. They need to delay the RTM and get these features in there come hell or high water.
Score: 0
|Honestly they should keep everything secret. That way there is no let down when they start stripping out all their promises that they can't keep.
Score: 0
|It's time to break up MSFT. This is evidence of their bloat.
Score: 0
|Rather be secretive about the big features while presenting the smaller ones that they know they can follow through with.
Seriously, I was looking forward to Vista years ago but when they started losing features, especially WinFS, I gave up on it and thought it was gonna be a glorified XP. I know there are some other good features but, personally, not enough to convince me to switch.
Score: 0
|Talking about disappointing shortcomings and half assing ... wasn't the new Apple OS suppose to come out in march? Also I wonder what kind of new Virtualization software Apple has and I wonder what kind of business grade Server Os's apple has coming out ... oh yea NONE! Since apple is so stingy with its intel macs and they don't have the man power to actually have Server or virtualization software on the level of Microsoft. Wow the truth sure is liberating.
Score: 0
|Yeah, uh........we're not talking about Apple. Apple never promised Virtualization software.
Apple is not a major player in the server market.
What Apple does, they do well.
Apple under promises and over delivers. Microsoft over promises and under delivers.
As each month and year go by Microsoft sucks more and more. I actually wouldn't have a problem if they just went out of business. Screw 'em.
Score: 0
|how about "screw you" motherfuker
Score: -1
|You dont really mean that. And if you do, then you are probably more ignorant to the reality than you think.
Score: 0
|Wow, this is becoming a habit of disappointment and shortcomings in Redmond. Remember all the grand things that Vista was supposed to bring? (Hey, but at least they spent five years on UAC!)
Score: 0
|"(Hey, but at least they spent five years on UAC!)"
You are pointing out a pain in the a** of Vista.....Cancel or Allow?
Score: 0
|Microsoft just half-asses everything they do anymore.
Score: 0
|