East coast iPhone 3G users report data service outages

By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published September 4, 2008, 11:04 AM

Update ribbon (small)

11:04 am EST September 4, 2008 - After iPhone 3G customers were informed yesterday by AT&T at about 10:30 am yesterday that a problem affecting their 3G data use had been resolved, an AT&T spokesperson informed Reuters that it had resolved the issue at about noon yesterday.

AT&T spokesperson Mark Siegel told Reuters that the telco had traced the problem to "a routing issue in the way data is routed to and from wireless devices," though no further information on the cause was revealed.

Customer complaints to the AT&T Wireless support forum did taper off substantially after noon yesterday, though even as of this morning, they have not disappeared altogether. One customer posted a comment after noon to say his 3G signals returned at full strength, and later in the afternoon edited that comment to say it had disappeared again.

Throughout the service outage, several users reported seeing their 3G bars drop to 1 or 0, while several others reported their bars at 5 (full strength) even though they were unable to receive or transmit data using UMTS.

One customer wrote early this morning, "This is what confuses me. I'm in an area that according to the coverage map has complete 3G service, and at my home and other places I will see 5 bars of signal strength, so I figure everything is good. But then it starts fluctuating from 5 bars to 1 or 2 then back to 5 and maybe down again. It'll do this while stationary as well as moving it. I've seen this much more frequently recently while also dropping a call once in a while. I even started a call while showing 5 bars then while on the call it dropped to 1 bar and then the call dropped out, all the time I and the phone were stationary."

2:18 pm EDT September 3, 2008 - A rapidly growing number of iPhone 3G users are complaining to AT&T's customer service forums today of spotty or completely unavailable 3G data service on their devices, often with one or even zero bars reported.

Callers to AT&T's customer support lines were informed this morning of a major service issue affecting iPhone customers on the US East Coast. Some were apparently told the issue would take 24 to 48 hours to fix, although the carrier gave no word as to the cause of the problem, or where it was centered.

Reception issues appear to be centered around 3G service -- specifically, the ability for the handset to send and receive data using UMTS. Some customers say they were able to get some service once they set their phone back to EDGE mode (2G), though a few complained about having to do this manually. Why couldn't the phone know to choose whichever service was providing the most bars at any one time? the customer asked -- although not quite that politely.

The first reports of problems, although sporadic, came at about 1:00 pm EDT yesterday. Many of the users reporting problems were in the Boston area, though others hailed from New York City, Long Island, throughout New Jersey, Connecticut, and Washington, DC and surrounding cities. A few reports spread as far west as Chicago and St. Louis. The level of posted complaints rose sharply by this morning.

The weather does not appear to be to blame here, since reception issues appear to be weighted toward the northeast US, which has thus far escaped the brunt of recent storms.

This morning at about 10:30 am, an AT&T moderator told customers on those forums that the issue had been resolved, and advised those still having problems to contact customer support (1-800-331-0500). While some customers, including a few from Boston, reported restored service, others claim service is still poor, and BetaNews was able to confirm receptivity problems continued in the Baltimore area as late as 1:30 pm Wednesday.

One AT&T customer reported being advised by customer support that he would receive a $25 credit for unavailable service, but to call back the moment that service was restored in order that AT&T could effectively pro-rate it.

As one Boston customer wrote early this morning, "Service interruptions should be on the front page of the [AT&T] Web site. Bandwidth has been dropping and dropping, AT&T seems to have no trouble with the sudden influx of cash, but it cannot handle the sudden demand on services to match. Why are we paying more for 3G service when it is worse and slower than EDGE?"

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

I think you would have to be stupid to buy the iphone on ATT network. There has been nothing but problems and the worst part, the iphone isnt even bringing anything new to the table in my opinion.

Score: 0

|

BWAHAHAH, that shows exactly how much you know. hahahah

Score: 0

|

Which is a hell of a lot more than you?

At least iTard7 has some creativity. Your entire act is summed up with;

BWAAHAHAH1! F*ck you!

Seriously, you need to get a grip.

Score: 0

|

I had ATT without 3G.

On two different phones, I'd have five bars in downtown Seattle and my signal would drop to one bar causing my connection to disconnect. After many hours on the phone w/ ATT customer support (lack of), I had to switch carriers because they said my problem didn't exist. In the end, I came to the conclusion customer's do not care if you have a bad signal. ;)

Score: 0

|

That's why I can't see having anybody else other than Verizon. As long as you have the signal icon on your phones screen (aka no bars, it's just "connected") you can still make calls no problem w/out so much as a hiccup. This is one of the differences between the ATT/Verizon wireless networks.

Score: 0

|

Not just Iphone users or even 3g, the whole AT&T network for data was down today. I noticed it also. Its on USATODAY.com

Score: 0

|

Wait...there's more to the 3G network than the iPhone?!

Score: 0

|

Considering how many have been complaining since the launch, will any of them notice a difference?

Score: 0

|

After telling US to mind its own business, Kroes slaps caps on Rambus royalties

The holder of many patents worldwide pertaining to DDR memory offered to reduce its royalty stake in that technology, and today the EU said yes.

Why Apple succeeds, and always will

The company consistently plays by different rules, literally like David did in his battle against Goliath.

EC's Kroes to US senators: Mind your own business on Oracle + Sun

UPDATED The EU's antitrust chief told the United States Senate Tuesday that any merger that takes place in the world is more her affair than theirs.

Betanews Podcast: Rupert Murdoch and the buying stuff online problem

We'll have a more difficult time paying for online news if the underlying protocol for online payment has a big gaping hole in it.

In a peace offering to newspapers, Google offers a new news format

It's probably not a solution to the woes of major news publishers, but Living Stories may gather a few of those publishers together in search of one.

Google Maps doesn't prevent car accidents, only search accidents

This week, Google updated Maps for Android 3.3.1, adding topography, nearby points of interest, and error reporting.

DOJ: Microsoft interop docs are now 'substantially complete'

A major milestone in the US Government's oversight of Microsoft is passed, as the Justice Dept. is now saying the company's protocol documents make sense.

The $1 DVD rental debate: LA group says Redbox will lose movie makers $1B

A report from the Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation says cheap Redbox DVD rentals could seriously damage the movie business.

First impressions of Droid: Easy, breezy, friendly, if a little fat

Though it's not quite as well-polished as Apple's iPhone OS, the version of Android that Motorola's Droid phone sports is still a breeze to use.

Windows fix for TLS security bug still forthcoming, won't be Tuesday

Anyone looking for a fix for last month's discovery of a potentially serious security hole in TLS and SSL may have to wait until everyone is ready to act together.

Not the first, not the last, technology predictions for 2010

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: The real truth is probably that what went around in 2009, will come around to haunt us next year.