FCC begins its drive toward a National Broadband Plan

By Tim Conneally | Published August 6, 2009, 10:11 AM

FCC Chairman (designate) Julius GenachowskiToday, the Federal Communications Commission is holding the first of more than 20 public workshops focusing on the state of broadband access in the US, which will lead up to the creation of the National Broadband Plan in February 2010.

"From this point forward, there really is no letting up," newly minted FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said yesterday. "This will be a deeply fact-based and data-driven process. We're bringing experts in-house and reaching out to external academic partners. This will be a seriously open and participatory process. Workshops will be streamed online and allow for external participation."

Today's workshop will look at the way broadband can improve effectiveness and efficiency in all levels of government and the potential benefits to the nonprofit sector. The commission must deliver the National Broadband Plan to Congress by February 17, providing a roadmap for giving Americans equal access to high-speed Internet.

"Doing new things -- experimenting to benefit the public -- means there will be mistakes," Genachowski said. "That's fine. I expect them. They are inevitable. Don't sweat it. We will make mistakes, we will learn from them, and we will move forward. I am sure we will also get many things right.  We will identify them, honor them, learn from what we do right and replicate it."

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

jesus christ shut up about "boo-hoo big business getting richer waaaaaaa". QQ more plz. you're just complaining about capitalism, and im getting fking tired of it. without "big business" would we have download speeds of 10, 15, 20, even 50mbps for ~$100 or less in DOZENS of markets? No. if it wasnt for "big companies" would we have upload speeds 10x faster than most download speeds of 10 years ago? No.

The UK is 1/40th the size of the US. Do you know how difficult it is to wire 3.7 million square miles of territory? NO THANKS

Score: 1

|

Right and when it's all said and done the broadbrand providers will have bought those in charge as they always do and have things their way. So basically nothing will change except for a few sound good but really do nothing policies.

Score: 1

|

It's true , too true. The big companies will get richer, just like the money they were given the last time to provide broadband to rural areas. Nothing will improve. And all the companies, (including the one i work for) will get the shaft. We are the people who bring broadband to the under-served, the people who are passed over by the telco's and the cable companies. And a huge weapon in our arsenal that we could have used to push further into the rural recesses, the 700mhz spectrum was sold to billionaires which only care more about lining their pockets than providing a service to rural america.
It's just like all politics, the idea is great..."Bring broadband to Everyone"...But then human nature, and greed take over, then it becomes like any other project. Just a lot of hot air, wishes and empty promises. If the government wants to do it right? Here's my idea! Build the infrastructure, and the providers will bring the net, bring fiber to more rural area's at decent cost. Build towers for wireless providers use.
You wonder why rural adoption of internet is slow???? Because it costs over 8000+/mo to bring a DS3 @ 45mbit to a rural area, that drives up the cost of the internet for everyone. On top of that you add on the available frequencies that wireless providers can use, which are enormously overcrowded might i add. Which just means you have to spend even more on equipment, towers, access points, and general infrastructure. It all boils down to cost. And the chance of them learning to listen to people, and stop listening to companies......

Oh well it'll never happen...

Score: 1

|

After telling US to mind its own business, Kroes slaps caps on Rambus royalties

The holder of many patents worldwide pertaining to DDR memory offered to reduce its royalty stake in that technology, and today the EU said yes.

Why Apple succeeds, and always will

The company consistently plays by different rules, literally like David did in his battle against Goliath.

EC's Kroes to US senators: Mind your own business on Oracle + Sun

UPDATED The EU's antitrust chief told the United States Senate Tuesday that any merger that takes place in the world is more her affair than theirs.

Betanews Podcast: Rupert Murdoch and the buying stuff online problem

We'll have a more difficult time paying for online news if the underlying protocol for online payment has a big gaping hole in it.

In a peace offering to newspapers, Google offers a new news format

It's probably not a solution to the woes of major news publishers, but Living Stories may gather a few of those publishers together in search of one.

Google Maps doesn't prevent car accidents, only search accidents

This week, Google updated Maps for Android 3.3.1, adding topography, nearby points of interest, and error reporting.

DOJ: Microsoft interop docs are now 'substantially complete'

A major milestone in the US Government's oversight of Microsoft is passed, as the Justice Dept. is now saying the company's protocol documents make sense.

The $1 DVD rental debate: LA group says Redbox will lose movie makers $1B

A report from the Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation says cheap Redbox DVD rentals could seriously damage the movie business.

First impressions of Droid: Easy, breezy, friendly, if a little fat

Though it's not quite as well-polished as Apple's iPhone OS, the version of Android that Motorola's Droid phone sports is still a breeze to use.

Windows fix for TLS security bug still forthcoming, won't be Tuesday

Anyone looking for a fix for last month's discovery of a potentially serious security hole in TLS and SSL may have to wait until everyone is ready to act together.

Not the first, not the last, technology predictions for 2010

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: The real truth is probably that what went around in 2009, will come around to haunt us next year.