RSSFCC commish holds exiting chair to the fire on DTV switch
By Angela Gunn | Published January 15, 2009, 3:20 PM
The current FCC is not going gentle into that Dubya night -- not with the DTV switchover looming on February 17. And reading between the lines of a letter sent Wednesday from FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell to outgoing FCC chair Kevin Martin, we suspect that Julius Genachowski has more than just technical issues to smooth when he takes over Martin's job. (And considering what usually passes for forthright discourse in DC, Martin may want an icepack for his tuchis, to take the sting off those footprints. It's quite the letter.)
McDowell expands on things said at Saturday's panel of FCC commissioners, which Betanews brought to you from CES. Martin also spoke in a separate event on Saturday, and we liveblogged that conversation for you. The letter in its entirety:
January 14, 2009
The Honorable Kevin J. Martin Chairman Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street, SW Washington, DC 20554
Dear Kevin:
I write to memorialize my comments at this weekend's Consumer Electronics Show by directly letting you know of my increasing concern about the Commission's ability to handle what will be a crush of inquiries in the coming days and weeks regarding the transition to digital television broadcasting. In short, it appears that the Commission's efforts to date are inadequate. As neither I, nor either of our colleagues, have been consulted in advance or otherwise asked to assist with the tasks at hand, I cannot be certain regarding the extent of the Commission's shortcomings.
For instance, I have questions about the reports indicating that requests for quotation related to the switch to digital television, including one to outsource FCC Consumer Center operations, remain pending. I wonder whether last week's FCC News Release announcing various contract awards completes the Commission's efforts. Likewise, although I am aware of industry efforts to try to provide a more coordinated approach to call centers, it appears that your fellow commissioners have not been brought into planning discussions concerning this important initiative. Given that the transition is little over a month away, I share the questions recently expressed by other shareholders as to the Commission's plans for awarding any outstanding contracts and educating personnel to satisfactorily resolve unique and likely technical questions.
In the meantime, there appears to be a lack of preparedness within the FCC Consumer Center (1-888-CALL-FCC). Through personal experience, I have found that busy signals are common. And, when the line actually rings, it frequently does so for more than two minutes. After what can be a lengthy period of ringing, the caller is greeted with an electronic options menu, rather than a live operator. Moreover, callers that opt for a live operator are sometimes spontaneously disconnected rather than re-routed. I am also concerned that our call center has not been staffed on recent weekends, when consumers having difficulties with newly purchased converter boxes are likely to reach out for help. Given that we have not reached the transition date, I am especially concerned by this lack of readiness.
As you know, some have called for reconsideration and possible extension of the February 17 analog cutoff date. I believe that the Commission's outreach and call center efforts can be remedied in time, but we have an extraordinary amount of ground to cover in a short period of time. To accomplish this daunting task, the Commission must be better organized, more energetic and must coordinate its efforts in a more open and collaborative manner. American consumers deserve nothing less.
Sincerely,
Robert M. McDowell
cc: The Honorable Michael J. Copps, The Honorable Jonathan S. Adelstein
I see Mr McDowell is covering his own "backside" here! This letter is his way of distancing himself from this fiasco before the new administration arrives, and all in the open. It's purely a self-serving attempt at a lifesaving political move by him, without question.
I do believe the fiasco should have been avoided long ago, along the lines he mentions. However, if Mr. McDowell is the captain of this ship, then he too is responsible for the fiasco. Where was this concern months ago? Why was this not brought up at that point? I'll tell you why, he was waiting to know who got elected into the presidents office. Since it was democrat, he needed to make a grand gesture just prior to inauguration and after the new chairman was chosen.
That, my friends, is why we are in the mess we are in....politics at its finest.
BTW: Mr McDowell, you aren't fooling anyone with this pitiful display. Very sad indeed.
Score: -1
|Hi BCortez -- actually, McDowell's just one of the commissioners, not captain of anything. martin is the head of the FCC (for now, anyway), which is why McDowell is sending him this letter. And McDowell, with Adelstein, did a pretty decent job of detailing what the commissioners have been doing re DTV and the obstacles they've encountered; that's all covered in the article linked above. Highly recommended reading.
Score: 0
|