FSF Releases GPL Revision Guidelines

By Ed Oswald | Published November 30, 2005, 12:40 PM

Since it's last revision of the GPL over a decade and a half ago, the software landscape has changed dramatically. Thus, the Free Software Foundation (FSF) on Wednesday released guidelines for revising the GNU General Public License. Version 3 of the GPL is currently in the works.

The organization hopes to have the first draft of the license available for review at a conference scheduled for January at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The GNU GPL is one of the most widely-used free software licenses; it is estimated that three-quarters of free and open source programs use the license.

The FSF pointed to research by Gartner that indicates as much as 75 percent of all IT organizations could have some portion of their technology strategies dealing with open source software. As a result, the group says the commercial sector will have a greater interest in what the license contains.

"The guiding principle for developing the GPL is to defend the freedom of all users," said Richard Stallman, founder of the Free Software Foundation. "As we address the issues raised by the community, we will do so in terms of the four basic freedoms software users are entitled to -- to study, copy, modify and redistribute the software they use."

After the first draft of the GPL version 3 is released in January, the FSF will then invite feedback from the software community at large. A second draft of the license is expected next summer with a final draft set for fall. The final version will be released no later than spring of 2007.

"Through this process, all voices will be heard. We will evaluate every opinion and will consider all arguments in light of the GPL's goals," Free Software Foundation general counsel Eben Moglen said.

Analysts applauded the FSF's move to keep the process open to all.

"Because this process is both inclusive and public, the FSF is ensuring that the views of everyone with an interest in the future of the GPL can participate in defining the next generation of the license," added Ovum IT research director Gary Barnett.

The last major revision of the GNU General Public License occurred in 1991.

View comments by with a score of at least

Breakthrough: AMD and Intel settle antitrust dispute, reach new cross-license agreement

UPDATED Only exclusionary business practices, not some rebates, may be covered by a new agreement on Intel's future business conduct.

Windows Marketplace for Mobile now available in browser, iTunes' App Store still not

You can now check out what Windows Marketplace for Mobile has to offer without a Windows Phone.

Microsoft damage control after marketer claims Win7 inspired by Mac

Have you ever said anything you wish you could take back? Ever? No? Not even once? Well then, you won't sympathize with a mid-level Microsoft manager today.

Facebook for iPhone developer goes from Apple supporter to 'I quit!' in 3 months

Fed up with Apple's App Store policies, the developer of Facebook for iPhone has bailed on the iPhone.

Google acquires Gizmo5, builds IP telephony portfolio

Google Voice today confirmed rumors that it would acquire IP telephony company Gizmo5

'A pivot from war to peace:' The AMD + Intel armistice, in their own words

An extraordinary day in technology history is recognized by two long-time rivals that mutually decided it's futile to fight anyplace else except the marketplace.

PS3, Xbox to soon get Twitter, Facebook integration

Both Microsoft's Xbox 360 and Sony's PlayStation 3 will integrate with Facebook in the near future.

The iTunes App Store at 100,000: Can we stop counting, already?

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: Is a six-digit number truly reflective of a healthy applications ecosystem? Or is it another type of bloat?

Analysis: The end of business-by-litigation?

The AMD v. Intel case ended neither with a bang nor a whimper, but almost with a song. Is it catchy enough for the rest of the PC world to sing in perfect harmony?

The agreement: Intel and AMD 'wipe the slate clean'

As the Securities and Exchange Commission document shows, AMD did indeed make some compromises in favor of Intel, especially with regard to conduct.

EC still holds Intel accountable even after AMD settlement

Though the future of relations between AMD and Intel may be peaceful now, the EC believes Intel may still owe restitution for its past conduct.