Four US news broadcasters expand on fast-growing Facebook

By Jacqueline Emigh | Published August 18, 2008, 7:03 PM

With Facebook growing at a far brisker clip than any other major social network, four big news organizations, including Fox News -- whose parent company owns rival MySpace -- are now expanding their Facebook presences.

News opportunities on Facebook could loom huge. Although about 32 percent of all Internet users belong to social networking sites, only roughly 10 percent of them regularly receive news on those sites, according to a new survey by Pew Research.

Meanwhile, Facebook has held the number one spot among social networking sites ever since overtaking MySpace in April of this year, says a new report from comScore released last week.

Over the past year, Facebook has enjoyed a 153% increase in new users, in contrast to an industry average of only 25% and an anemic rate of just three percent for MySpace.

Now, although ABC News has pulled a "U.S. Politics" application launched on Facebook last year, Disney-owned ABC is also expected to roll out a new and larger news application on Facebook over the next few weeks.

CNN and MSNBC.com -- the online portal for NBC News -- have both confirmed they are working on improving their own respective presences on Facebook.

On Tuesday, Fox -- an organization owned, like MySpace, by News Corp. -- is expected to unveil a new video player for the Facebook site that will let users watch Fox and Fox News videos, post selected clips to their own profiles, and share those clips with friends on Facebook.

Fox will also roll out a redesigned page on Facebook designed for full exploitation of Facebook features such as user reviews, polls, and discussion boards.

Why is Facebook growing so rapidly? Some observers point to increasing globalization on the site since Facebook's adoption of natural language interfaces a couple of years ago.

Moreoever, outside of Facebook's proven attractiveness to new users, Joel Cheatwood, Fox's senior VP for development, has cited some demographic differences between Facebook and MySpace, contending that Facebook pulls in a slightly older social networking crowd.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

broadcasters take whatever action is needed to gain my advertising money.

more money for facebook but likely to become a poorer service and people will begin to go elsewhere.

Score: 0

|

Great to see the "Murdoch kiss of death" in operation. He buys MySpace, it dies. He buys into ITV (UK) and it shares bomb. Even his UK Sky TV has haemorrhaged viewers...

http://www.ukfree.tv/barb/Total_Sky.png

So, Facebook... probably time to block Murdoch's Fox channels before he kills off your platform too!

Score: 0

|

And you're complaining about Murdoch? Seems he's a rare breath of fresh air in the midst of cultural degeneration called social networking if he is actually capable of doing that!

Besides, who wants to see what 13 year olds and Obama supporters 'think'? ...sorry for both the redundancy and the outrageous assertion!

Score: 0

|

contending that Facebook pulls in a slightly older social networking crowd

That's certainly an understatement. MySpace is for children. They're the only ones who don't feel nauseous when seeing the ugly layouts people have thrown together in as obnoxious a manner as is possible.

Score: 0

|

If MySpace is for children, Facebook is for adolescents. As for the ugly layouts, they are the default design for MySpace, there is hardly any real way people could make them better even if they tried. Facebook isn't much better. Somebody here once described it so, Social Networking sites are ghettos. Messy, ugly and sometimes dangerous.

Score: 0

|

Hey, be nice!

The nauseaus Wired mag model of layout is rad, way cool, tubular, or whatever hip term you want to call it.

My take? Who cares. I ignore them all.

Next.

Score: 0

|

Mark Russinovich on MinWin, the new core of Windows

The next version of Windows three years hence will likely build onto a significant architectural change implemented in Windows 7 and Server 2008 R2.

Security firm: Windows patches not responsible for 'Black Screen of Death'

On second thought, maybe that access control list thingie with the lockdown something-or-rather didn't trigger an alleged, perhaps non-existent, pandemic.

My Windows 7 confession (and why you should confess, too)

I've held back the real reason for sticking with Windows 7, even as, gulp, iLife calls me to go back to the Mac.

Apple settles with Psystar except for 'circumvention devices'

The fracas with the Florida clone computer maker might have ended today had Apple not have muddled the issue over a cheap piece of Psystar software.

Google begrudgingly adjusts news crawling for paid publishers

If publishers want to make readers pay for news content, and thereby drive down its popularity and Google ranking, the company says, they can just go right on ahead.

Fee or free? Murdoch, Huffington square off over the cost of Internet news

Participants in an FTC workshop yesterday witnessed the two extremes of the Web news publishing debate, still centered on the issue of long-term profitability.

Microsoft denies latest 'Black Screen of Death' claims

After an anti-malware producer announced a fix to what it says is a swarm of recent KSoD problems, evidence of the swarm itself has yet to turn up.

Latest Firefox 3.6 beta fixes 133 bugs, promises faster page load times

A once-sluggish beta testing process has kicked into overdrive, with astonishing success at finding serious bugs. Will Mozilla be able to fix all the others in time?

Confirmed: Office 2010 to ship in June

Two weeks after Microsoft had been expected to draw a clearer roadmap for its principal applications suite, it's finally ready to commit to the end of H1.

New EU antitrust commissioner will oversee Microsoft, Oracle+Sun, Intel issues

As one of Europe's most prominent politicians shifts positions in January, her replacement remains a question mark over technology's biggest issues.

Without its own 'iTablet' yet, is Apple missing the boat?

Steve Jobs is on record as dissing "single-purpose" devices like e-readers. But given their recent popularity, was that a mistake?