Fujitsu enters the half-terabyte HDD fray

By Tim Conneally | Published February 25, 2008, 5:28 PM

Fujitsu is now the third company to have announced a half terabyte 2.5" drive by announcing its MHZ2 BT.

Fujitsu's reputation for HDD production has a few historical black marks. In 2001-2002, over 300,000 of its PB16 family of drives had to be recalled and replaced due to severe overheating. This resulted in a $43 million class action lawsuit settled in 2004. Furthermore, the company's Lifebook N3010 reportedly tended to run on the extremely hot side (October 2006 Sony battery issue notwithstanding).

This 2.5" 500 GB 4200 RPM SATA HDD is the fourth-generation high capacity 4200 RPM SATA drive to come from Fujitsu. Read/Write time is expected to be 12/14 milliseconds on average, with 1.5 millisecond track-to-track seek time. The device has been certified best in class for power consumption, typically demanding 1.8 Watts for read and write operations, 0.5W of power is consumed during idle time, and only 0.13W is typically required power to maintain standby and sleep modes.

Due to the drive's 12.5mm height profile, it may not be able to fit into all laptop drive bays. This condition is shared by Hitachi's TravelStar 5K500 half-terabyte 2.5" drive, which it debuted at MacWorld this year.

Of the three 500 GB to be out soon, Fujitsu's is also the only one that spins at 4200 RPM. Samsung's Spinpoint M6, which it showed at CES 2008, is only 9.5" high and spins at 5400 RPM, and Hitachi's drive utilizes that speed as well. Furthermore, companies like Western Digital and Toshiba offer 320 GB 2.5" drives at that speed.

Fujitsu expects its MHZ2 BT to ship this month, as does Hitachi with its TravelStar 5K500. Samsung's Spinpoint M6 is due in March.

While this consumer product looks to be "fat and slow," Fujitsu seems to be compensating in the private sector. The company recently announced it had been contracted to produce a massively parallel supercomputer for Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, based on 3,392 of its FX1 technical computing servers. Peak theoretical performance of this system is 135 teraflops.

Comments

This is great for people working with media / audio / video. Laptops are fast enough these days but fill up too quickly. Let's see if this fits into a ThinkPad Ultrabay.

Score: 0

|

You don't want to be working with A/V on a 4200 rpm drive.

Believe me.

It's *not* fun.

Score: 0

|

^This^

Score: 0

|

Personnally, I think I'm fine with 80GB.

Score: 0

|

I agree with my cat.

Score: 0

|

Not bad, but I don't know any laptops that would be able to carry this. By the time that there is a one terabyte regular laptop hard drive running at 7200rpm, people will have already switched to online storage.

www.talkprice.net

Score: 0

|

Why would anyone in their right mind want to switch to online storage? You'd be at the mercy of your connection and ISP....

Score: 0

|

Online storage ?? Are you some kind of crackpot ?

If your working on a laptop, then your not always going to be able to pop on the internet to pull down that large database your working on. Some people want decent sized drives on laptops. More and more so with laptops having the most growth, with people choosing laptops as their main computer. If you need the capacity how you mention, it makes no sense not choosing a external USB drive to store them.

The power needed to spin a 7200 drive in a laptop, not to mention the increased sensitivity of higher speed drives means this is less desirable to implement for manufactures. To comment on this at 1tb, made me chuckle somewhat, since I think this is unattainable just yet.

Laptop models change all the time, and while apple is shrinking theirs to achieve a sleeker fashionable product, others will want to give a more solid and feature rich spec to appeal to power users. Profiles can be changed to allow for these drive, and since there are more manufactures producing them, then it appears they anticipate a growing market.

I think there is a need to incorpororate a much higher buffer for these drives, to give them the punch needed at these speeds.

Score: 0

|

Don't wait for Microsoft's patch: Secure Windows now from today's 0-day

Microsoft is recommending users simply get rid of a vulnerable ActiveX control that no one even uses any more. We'll show you how to do that right now.

Nokia: Android? Are you crazy?

Rumors about new Android devices abound, but Nokia squashes this one.

Symantec goes live with Norton 2010 betas

Norton Internet Security and Norton Antivirus 2010 are now available for testing.

What's Now: Drenched with 'Purple Ra1n,' iPhone users caught eating 'redsn0w'

Plus: Symantec and McAfee go to war, and what's LucasArts building in its top-secret, moon-shaped orbital facility?

In New York, online booze loses a Circuit Court decision

Court worried about gangster influence if liquor purchased directly.

British Telecom sacks bitterly unpopular Phorm ad platform

Phorm under BT is no more, but the targeted ad service could still go on under Virgin or TalkTalk.

CBS is the last man standing against Hulu

Popular streaming syndication site Hulu now has all the major networks in its camp except CBS.

Not just Vista: The operating system is dying, too

Carmi Levy: Wide Angle Zoom Vista's troubles point to a bigger shift that will affect more than just Microsoft.

Bolt: the dark horse mobile browser

Bitstream's small-footprint mobile browser is available in Beta 3

IE8 WSUS update push to begin August 25

After months of availability to users willing to seek it out, Internet Explorer 8 will be rolled into Windows Server...

Geeks vs. journalists: A tale of two worldviews

Recovery with Angela Gunn Why geeks think most mainstream journalism is flaky, and why the mainstream thinks geeks are trying to kill them. (They're both right.)

Can Linux do BitLocker better than Windows 7?

Betanews kicks off a new series with a look at how the Linux operating system's FDE stacks up against BitLocker, the Windows feature that today commands a $120 premium.

Windows 7 ISO Verifier 1.0

July 6 - 5:40 PM ET

ProgDVB 6.10.2

July 6 - 5:19 PM ET

FreeBSD 8.0 Beta 1

July 6 - 4:58 PM ET

K-Lite Codec Pack 64-bit 2.5.0

July 6 - 3:55 PM ET

SysCheckUp 1.4.0

July 6 - 3:34 PM ET