GoDaddy Petitions to Block .com Deal

By Ed Oswald | Published March 13, 2006, 11:42 AM

Domain name registrar GoDaddy.com said Monday that it had filed a petition with the Department of Commerce to block an agreement between ICANN and VeriSign. The company said it wanted the deal sent back to the Internet's governing body to ensure fairer terms on the stewardship of the .com top-level domain.

GoDaddy said that it, along with a majority of .com registrars, believe the terms of the agreement are unacceptable. VeriSign would be able to raise registration fees without justification in four of the next seven years, and retains "presumptive renewal" rights when the agreement ends in 2012.

While VeriSign and ICANN have accepted the settlement, the deal still requires final approval by the Department of Commerce. Thus, GoDaddy and others have decided to complain directly to the government body in a last-ditch effort to scuttle the deal.

"We will not sit back without a fight. This deal is outrageous," GoDaddy CEO Bob Parsons said. "It's monopolistic because it locks in price hikes and eliminates good old-fashion competition. It's a mistake [Commerce] Secretary Gutierrez can stop."

A majority of public comments solicited by ICANN were against the deal, the company points out. Still, less than a week after the close of the commenting period ICANN released terms of a deal that, on the surface, look extremely favorable to VeriSign.

In a letter sent to Secretary Gutierrez on Friday, Parsons said that ICANN acted contrary to its stated purpose in the organizations bylaws by keeping the negotiations largely a closed process, and failed to address many of concerns of the public brought up during the comment period in the settlement.

"ICANN has lost the trust of the community," Parsons told Gutierrez.

The Department of Commerce has set no timeframe for final approval of the settlement, however a decision is expected within the next several months.

VeriSign responded to the petition in a harsh statement Monday, citing the complicated infrastructure required to run the .com domain.

"It is unfortunate that the registrars are placing their own narrow interests above the operational stability and security of the Internet. Usage of .com has quadrupled in the last five years and attacks on the infrastructure have grown in volume and sophistication," VeriSign spokesman Tom Galvin said.

"Unfortunately, these registrars take no responsibility for the Internet’s reliability."

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

what's godaddy?

Score: 0

|

fell asleep during the past two superbowls eh? http://www.godaddy.com/g...wl05/landing.asp?se=%2B

Score: 0

|

Why does it take these pencil pushhers always months to do things?

Score: 0

|

Hmmm. 2012, the end of the Mayan calendar.
Coincidence?
You be the judge

Score: 0

|

there's obviously more than meets the eye to benefit godaddy from this complaint .... but for what's obvious, this is a good thing :) ....

Score: 0

|

I think it is exactly what meets the eye. Godaddy wants cheaper prices so they can raise prices (if they want) and keep more for themselves. I think they also might like to be the ones managing the .com top level domain. They want more of the pie thats all, typical buisness. But I agree if they argue then perhaps lower prices for us.

Score: 0

|

Your comment about GoDaddy wanting cheaper prices so that they can raise them makes no sense. However, I do agree with the rest. It makes sense for GoDaddy to try to block the deal. ICANN (more like ICANT) should be taken to task. VeriSign has also done things that have caused the ire of webmasters.

Score: 0

|

i think he meant cheaper prices from verisign/ICANN so GoDaddy can have a bigger margin.

Score: 0

|

I don't think it's GoDaddy's intent to raise their prices, or try and lower prices on the wholesale side. In all fairness, we could acuse ICANN and Verisign of collusion and conspiracy to raise .com prices, also making Verisign the permanent keeper of the .com, and yet lining Verisign's pockets with the extra cash forever.

I've been waiting for something like this to happen from one of the bigger registrars. I think it's a smart move, and I just home the Commerce Dept. has the balls to send it back to the drawing board.

Score: 0

|

Not-so-mobile battery life: Time to force the issue

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: If power efficiency is important when you buy a car or even a motorcycle, why shouldn't it matter for a smartphone?

Microsoft 'worked with Apple' for Silverlight on iPhone, says Goldfarb

By not making such a big deal out of trying to stream video to the iPhone, Microsoft got a big deal out of it, revealed the Silverlight product manager.

Microsoft's Ray Ozzie: 'Nobody's going to be 100% open'

The mobile apps ecosystems of the world may converge over time, led by apps being ported over across platforms, according to the Chief Software Architect.

Without its own 'iTablet' yet, is Apple missing the boat?

Steve Jobs is on record as dissing "single-purpose" devices like e-readers. But given their recent popularity, was that a mistake?

Apple invokes DMCA, claims Psystar is 'trafficking in circumvention devices'

In trying to close the book on possibly the last attempt at a Mac clone, Apple cites from its own landmark case...but may actually be misinterpreting it.

The fallacy of Facebook privacy

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: If an insurance company learns something interesting about its client through the Internet, is that snooping?

Clicker.com cuts through the Web video chaos

In a world where homemade video and Hollywood movies travel the same pipeline, it's good to have a real search engine to cut through the clutter.

A case study in improving software: What Office 2010 can learn from Notion 3

A music composition product gambles with a complete overhaul, in an effort to make headway against two well-known competitors in a tough market.

Kindle 2 update adds battery life, native PDF reader

Amazon has pushed out an update to the Kindle 2 e-reader that lengthens battery life and adds a native PDF viewer.

Safari on iPhone gets competition from a $1 browser app

Apple likes to say it gives iPhone users a full browsing experience, but a new competitor tries to incorporate more desktop browser features.