Google Tests Accessible Search Page
By Ed Oswald | Published July 20, 2006, 3:49 PM
Google is testing a version of its popular search engine that would allow those with vision problems to more easily use the site. Called Accessible Search, the page is different from normal Google Web search in that it also evaluates site usability in ranking results.
Complex site designs can make web surfing very difficult for those with disabilities. For example, individuals that use devices to convert text to speech may find it hard to find what they're looking for, says Google Research Scientist T.V. Raman.
"If the information I'm after is on a visually busy page, I have to sort through that page to find the text I want--an extra step that can sometimes be very time-consuming," Raman said. The Google employee, who is blind, leads the project at the Mountain View, Calif. company.
The tweaked Google search engine can be found on Google Labs, the company's testbed for new products. Along with the traditional ranking algorithm, Raman has added an additional layer that inspects the site for usability issues.
To do this, the feature looks at the HTML code behind the page for specific attributes that make it easier for devices like page readers. "It tends to favor pages that degrade gracefully--that is, pages with few visual distractions, and pages that are likely to render well with images turned off," Raman explained.
The customized search engine is built on top of Google Co-op technology, which the company released to allow developers to build search engines that optimize results based on interests or other uses.
Millions could benefit from such work; a 2001 survey found that eight million people have visual impairments and would need some type of assistance in using the Web.
Lighthouse International, a national leader in print and online accessibility, applauded Google's recent efforts. "This is a very important step by Google and other Internet companies. It demonstrates an enlightened understanding of the need to apply sophisticated technology to meet the growing needs of the consumer," commented Lighthouse CEO Tara A. Cortes, PhD, RN.
I would have thought that "Google Search Accessible" would favor such sites that are compliant with the federal US guidelines section 508 for accessibility. However, they do not, as my quick test showed.
http://conficio.blogspot...s-search-for-blind.html
So who gets it right? The US government or Google? Should we test now for Google ranking instead?
Score: 0
|Searching for anything gives an error. At least that is accessible.
I've been trying to work on a website at www.sitereviews.biz that reviews websites on various things like usability. Never have enough time and/or inclination.
Score: 0
|Have you checked the code Google serves in its "accessible" results page?
tables for layout: check
font tags: check
no DOCTYPE: check
W3C # errors: 170
Google has an ability to create ugly tag soup that ignores most of the advice it is hypocritically giving other sites. sheesh, someone at google read a book on modern web design please. amateurs.
Score: 0
|W3C HTML standards are not the same thing as accessibility standards. Please learn the difference. Thanks.
...sheesh, someone at google read a book on modern web design please. amateurs.
lol... I'm not even going to touch this one. Anyone else want to explain it?
Score: 0
|Companys build websites to target specific audiences. For some dumb reason they don't consider the disabled as an important audience type, while many have lived successful and productive lives.
2 thumbs down to web devs :P
Score: 0
|Agreed.
I always make sure my websites meet at least basic accessibility standards. That's a heck of a lot more than most people do.
Score: 0
|I think this is a waste of time.
Site designers need to cater for these type of people and its pointless to just filter the sites to show easier to read sites.
Score: 0
|I think what you said is pointless everybody should be treated equal and fair. God made all of us but different. Some people are fast and slow but we all must have a chance at lifes changes.
Score: 0
|Agreed that site-designers should take care of it, but the overwhelming truth is: they don't.
Since there are sites that don't, I think this is a worthwhile effort. Great idea, Google.
Score: 0
|