Google and Harvard split on Book Search agreement

By Angela Gunn | Published November 4, 2008, 7:45 PM

The recent agreement between Google and various litigants has caused Harvard to walk away from its longstanding partnership on Google Book Search -- at least where copyrighted works are concerned.

The two will continue to work on scanning books that have entered the public domain. No books already scanned by the project will be affected. Harvard's been on board the search project since its pilot days in late 2004.

After reading the $125 million agreement, Harvard concluded that the arrangement simply wasn't reasonable (yes, those were Harvard's words), lacking protections against outrageous author fees and disallowing the sort of access to materials to which the project has been historically committed.

In a statement released to the Harvard Crimson, University library director Robert C. Darnton said that "the settlement provides no assurance that the prices charged for access will be reasonable, especially since the subscription services will have no real competitors [and] the scope of access to the digitized books is in various ways both limited and uncertain."

Harvard's not the only organization that has cast a gimlet eye on the agreement. In a reader's guide to the decision, Fred von Lohmann of the Electronic Frontier Foundation described the terms as "plainly second-best from the point of view of those who believe Google would have won the fair use question at the heart of the case." Still, he shrugged, simply having the matter settled helps Google get on with the project.

The agreement between Google and the litigants, led by the Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers, still requires ratification by a district court in New York.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

Swooft, you idiot.

Spam and no way for us to contact you if we wanted too.

LOL!

Score: 0

|

Microsoft's Ray Ozzie: 'Nobody's going to be 100% open'

The mobile apps ecosystems of the world may converge over time, led by apps being ported over across platforms, according to the Chief Software Architect.

Will Firefox beat IE9 to Direct2D rendering?

Just days after Microsoft executives gave conference attendees a peek at a new rendering technology, a Mozilla contributor revealed he's working on the same thing.

Where there's smoke: Apple warranty stance raises troubling questions

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: Smoking can be dangerous not only for your lungs, it appears, but for your Apple hardware warranty.

The fallacy of Facebook privacy

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: If an insurance company learns something interesting about its client through the Internet, is that snooping?

Microsoft 'worked with Apple' for Silverlight on iPhone, says Goldfarb

By not making such a big deal out of trying to stream video to the iPhone, Microsoft got a big deal out of it, revealed the Silverlight product manager.

Clicker.com cuts through the Web video chaos

In a world where homemade video and Hollywood movies travel the same pipeline, it's good to have a real search engine to cut through the clutter.

A case study in improving software: What Office 2010 can learn from Notion 3

A music composition product gambles with a complete overhaul, in an effort to make headway against two well-known competitors in a tough market.

Kindle 2 update adds battery life, native PDF reader

Amazon has pushed out an update to the Kindle 2 e-reader that lengthens battery life and adds a native PDF viewer.

Safari on iPhone gets competition from a $1 browser app

Apple likes to say it gives iPhone users a full browsing experience, but a new competitor tries to incorporate more desktop browser features.

Action Replay maker sues Microsoft for Xbox 360 'predatory technological barriers'

Third-party video game accessory maker Datel has filed an antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft over the Xbox 360's recent Dashboard update.