Intel extends its winning streak, but a bad storm is coming
By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published April 16, 2008, 11:43 AM
It has reclaimed the honor of being the world's leading CPU manufacturer in every important respect. But like a kid with a hole in his Easter basket, Intel's leaving a trail behind it: Its flash memory business could be its Achilles' heel.
There's a point where you can't help but laugh at the night-and-day difference between Intel's business status and that of its singular competitor, AMD. Then there comes a point where you stop laughing and almost start to cry in sympathy for AMD's position, having been pushed back an entire process generation, fighting hard from its traditional stronghold in the value segment.
Then there's a later point in time when you pretty much run out of new emotions, and we may have finally reached that point with Intel's release of its quarterly earnings numbers late yesterday afternoon. It's a clearly healthy company, having completed its riskiest reorganization to date and having come out of it as not only the performance leader on the high end but poking big holes in AMD's front lines in the mid-range and value segments.
But not even the rose tint to the glasses everyone at Intel wore yesterday could hide a bad portent on the horizon: The economy is definitely turning south, and any company with a substantial investment in flash memory is going to feel the worst of it, as Intel acknowledged yesterday.
First, the good side of the news: Revenues were up about 9.3% for the quarter ending in March, to just over $9 2/3 billion. And with the total cost of goods sold only rising 1% on the year, gross margins skyrocketed 3.8% annually to 53.8%. That's a sign that buyers in all segments overall have been willing to pay an extra premium to invest in Intel's performance; and as always, its best performing CPUs do carry a premium.
When you break down the news by segment, you find that CPUs were 100% of the reason for Intel's gains. Desktop and server CPU revenues rose nearly 15.8% over the first quarter of 2007 to $4.1 billion, while mobile CPU revenues rose about 11.7% to $2.72 billion.
The drag continues to come from everything else that Intel's into these days, especially the chipset business. Chipsets have never been Intel's bread and butter; some have likened more to the broccoli on the side of the plate that never gets appreciated. Appreciating is something chipsets and flash memory-related businesses certainly failed to do for Intel this quarter, posting a 1.5% annual revenue drop in the desktop and server segment, to under $1.2 billion. There was a nearly 9% gain for chipsets in the mobile segment, but that's a low-revenue division anyway with nowhere to go but up, now at $943 million.
That's where you realize the storm front is almost here. First-quarter revenue for any consumer-facing company is always down "seasonally" over the fourth quarter of the previous year. But this year the drop was 10% over Q4 2007, and the double-digits often sound alarm bells. And even though operating income for the last quarter shot up a fantastic 23% over the previous year's Q1, once you figure in Intel's loss on investments (there's the flash memory part of the equation) plus taxes, the company actually dropped 12 points of net revenue.
A recent report from hardware analysis firm iSuppli assessed the worldwide revenue decrease in the NOR flash memory business for the final quarter of 2007 to have been 11.9%, to just $1.9 billion. (Keep in mind just Intel reaps from CPUs alone over five times what everyone in the NOR flash business makes in one quarter combined.) Intel took the worst hit of all over the holidays, iSuppli estimated: a 19.6% annual drop in revenues from NOR flash.
Had it not been for flash memory, Intel stated in a warning to investors last month, that gross margin would have been closer to 56% rather than the 53.8% it turned out to be -- actually on the low side of its adjusted estimate.
The company's plan for weathering the storm looks like this: Intel has already shed some more assets, and it may continue to do so for awhile. Already, it has about 7,200 fewer employees than it had at this time last year. There will be some costs associated with that paring down, and it'll be reflected in next quarter's guidance numbers, which average out at about $9.3 billion in revenue. But the company expects that gross margin to float back to 56% next quarter and 57% for the year overall, back where it belongs. It'll get there by virtue of those assets reduction charges being taken right away, and investments in research in development shifted sooner rather than later.
Had Intel CEO Paul Otellini not taken the steps he did to move his company back into the wholesale manufacture of black ink, it might not have nearly as much strength today to weather the economic storm of 2008.
Without knowing their exact structure, such an arangement might actually be quite advantageous, as they can potentially write off the losses againt the profits and pay less taxes and actually increase their net profits.
Companies don't only have problems making too little money, they can have a problem with too much as well.
I suspect the accountants will have a field day with this 'bad news'.
Score: 0
|I purchased a Radeon 3870 instead of a Nvidia even though I was more interested in the Nvidia to give AMD some support. If AMD fall then it would be hell on the consumers. Talking about CPU price increases, new technology rolling out slowly etc. Come on AMD get your act together
Score: 0
|Good for you!
Score: 0
|boo hoo, Intel is winning in the processor segment, but loosing in the flash and chipset segment.
If I were Intel I'd just dump the Intel chipsets, their crap anyway. Just keep going on with the processors, get rid of the fat.
The sad thing is if AMD goes out of business all Intel processor prices are going to go up.
Score: 0
|Intel's chipsets may be the worst for the high end market but their chipsets without the integrated graphics for midrange and low end computers are the best available.
Score: 0
|I would say Nforce chipsets are the best available for mid, low and high end (without integrated graphics please...unless you can SLI the integrated graphics chip with a real graphics card).
Score: 0
|I imagine now that AMD has that in their roadmap (for Crossfire), nVidia will also try to do the same with SLI. nVidia has further to go though, because SLI still needs identical cards whereas Crossfire does not.
But realistically, that will making f'all difference to a high-end card. What's adding a 6150 GPU to a 9800GTX going to really do for you?
Score: 0
|People using low end and even midrange computers are likely going to be using their computers for browsing the web and checking their e-mail most of the time so 3D graphics performance isn't a huge concern. Nvidia's chipsets are the slowest performing chipsets ever created when it comes to transferring data to and from a serial ATA hard disk in a computer.
Score: 0
|bah, where's the "delete comment" button?
Score: 0
|LOL!!!
Score: 0
|