Login:
Password:

Intel Announces 'Truland,' 64-Bit Xeon

By Nate Mook, BetaNews

March 30, 2005, 8:14 AM

Intel is topping off its single-core Xeon offerings with a new 64-bit processor platform code-named Truland, as the company transitions towards dual-core chips. Truland is billed as Centrino for servers, and is comprised of Intel's E8500 chipset with PCI Express support, DDR2-400 memory, and 64-bit Xeon MP processors.

Truland is targeted at mid-range enterprises for servers with four or more processors. Intel touts performance increases of 70 percent over previous Xeon chips, which is aided by support for 8MB of Level 3 cache. Truland's E8500 chipset features a faster 667 MHz bus and will eventually support dual-core Xeon's, known as "Paxville."

"This year, Intel celebrates 10 years in the multiprocessor server market segment that began with the Intel Pentium processor and today adds a sixth generation of the Intel Xeon processor MP," said Pat Gelsinger, senior vice president and general manager of Intel's Digital Enterprise Group.

The new 64-bit Xeons will be supported by Microsoft's forthcoming x64 editions of Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP, which are expected to be released to manufacturing shortly.

"With Windows Server 2003 x64 Editions, Microsoft is delivering a single platform that will provide high-performance benefits for existing 32-bit applications, plus breakthrough performance and scalability for 64-bit applications," said Andy Lees, Microsoft corporate vice president of Server and Tools Marketing and Solutions.

But the new 64-bit Xeons won't come cheap. Intel's top-of-the-line chip that runs at 3.33 GHz with 8MB of L3 cache is priced at $3692 USD in 1,000 unit quantities. Lowering the speed to 3 GHz drops the price to $1980 USD. Intel's "Value Processors" with 1MB of L2 cache start at $722 USD in 1,000 unit quantities.

Add a Comment (5 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By SaCo

posted Mar 30, 2005 - 10:30 AM

welp fight on intel fight on AMD who will win ..well if i had it my way it would be amd but only time will tell :) now when either of em gives me the quad core then i can enjoy my unreal tournament 2012 in peace wile i encode a Xvid vid in the backgroun and jam 2 some ogg encoded at lvl 10 and the vol UPP.....i have gmail invites care to have one email me and tell me where ya saw the post mrfrostbite@gmail.com.....see its good 2 read the posts of a fool

Score: 0

By snoopy3216

posted Mar 30, 2005 - 11:29 AM

yes the battle heats up, and i look forward to it and i think intel will succeed once more, but i think your post is rediculous

Score: 0

By roj

posted Mar 30, 2005 - 8:06 PM

AMD64 will remain the better processor and continue to gain market share at intel's expense. intel is technologically bankrupt as far as processors go and has been gor a while now.

Of course some corporate lemmings will still believe the intel-sponsored hype and keep buying their wares but the smart ones will move on to the real technological leader especially since the majors now offer AMD alternatives.

Score: 0

By rauckr

posted Mar 31, 2005 - 4:10 PM

What are the relative merits of the AMD64 processor vs the new Intel processor from your perspective? I have not seen a good comparason.

Score: 0

By Planet.Of.Wounds

posted Mar 31, 2005 - 2:37 AM

[The Easter Bunny] will remain the better [bunny] and continue to gain market share at [The Tooth Fairy's] expense. [The Tooth Fairy] is technologically bankrupt as far as [bunnies] go and has been gor a while now.

Of course some corporate lemmings will still believe the [Tooth Fairy]-sponsored hype and keep buying their wares but the smart ones will move on to the real technological leader especially since the majors now offer [Easter Bunny] alternatives.

Score: 0