Jobs Apologizes for Accounting Issues
By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published October 4, 2006, 6:36 PM
In a report to the US Securities and Exchange Commission regarding allegations that the company may have failed to report certain backdated options granted to its senior executives as expenses over the last several years, Apple today said its CEO, Steve Jobs, knew something about his company's options backdating practices, but never benefited from backdating personally.
"Stock option grants made on 15 dates between 1997 and 2002 appear to have grant dates that precede the approval of those grants," Apple acknowledged in a statement. Jobs was re-appointed "interim CEO" of Apple in September 1997.
Backdating options is the practice of granting options whose exercise dates are set to sometime in the past, in order that they may immediately be of some value on paper - assuming the company's stock value has risen since that date.
Though not an illegal practice, the failure of a public company to report the value of those option grants as expenses is considered illegal. If Apple finds itself (along with several other companies that are the topic of SEC investigations, including nVidia and Juniper Networks) having to restate its earnings for up to nine years, it could dramatically change the financial landscape of the company, negatively impacting investor confidence for some time to come.
That loss in confidence could conceivably outweigh any financial penalty Apple may incur on the part of the SEC.
Apple says the actions of two of its former officers are now being heavily scrutinized; and one of its former executives and recent board members, Fred Anderson, has resigned from the company's board of directors. Anderson was Apple's CFO from 1996 until 2004.
"I apologize to Apple's shareholders and employees for these problems, which happened on my watch," Jobs stated this afternoon. "They are completely out of character for Apple." The complete details of Apple's SEC report have yet to be revealed, and may remain private pending a decision by that body.
how can this not be e-legal? has anyone heard or know of an explanation to this?
Score: 0
|...
Maybe Steve Jobs can wrangle a prison cell
next to Patty Dunn's ?
...
The Computer Rodent
...
Score: 0
|Wake me when there is REAL news...
YAWN
Score: 0
|Maybe he's not taking personal responsibility so he doesn't go to jail. Nothing personal; it's scummy and bad P.R., but if it's that versus the clink, I'd chose to look like an ass, instead of take it there..
Score: 0
|Uh... he DID take responsibility. That's what this article is about.
"I apologize to Apple's shareholders and employees for these problems, which happened on my watch," Jobs stated this afternoon.
Score: 0
|I would love it if just once someone would truley apologize for THEIR mistake. Nobody can take the blame anymore--that's why everything is Bush's fault, your parent's fault, neighbor's fault--but never your own.
Score: 0
|That's It Jobs. Blame it on somebody who is gone from the company. You are following in the footsteps of CEOs from other scumbag companies.
Score: 0
|I have never been impressed with Steve Jobs' personality. He is a self-seeking, ruth-less, and cold-blooded person that you could never trust, and feel good to be around--if you know what I mean. How this Universe allows a person like Steve Jobs to live one more second, is beyond my simple comprehension. Can you explain that, please?
Score: 0
|