Justice Department sued by EFF over Google privacy official

By Michael Hatamoto | Published February 29, 2008, 2:52 PM

The Electronic Frontier Foundation recently took aim at the Department of Justice, wanting all communications between Google and a former top privacy official who now works for the Mountain View-based Internet search giant.

Specifically, the EFF wants to know more about why Jane Horvath was chosen to become the company's senior privacy lawyer, and what may have influenced the decision.

?In February 2006, Horvath was appointed the Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer of the DoJ, and held that position until August 2007, when she announced she would leave the DOJ position to join Google and serve as Senior Privacy Counsel.

Also in 2006, the DOJ requested Google turn over information of every item searched for using Google for one week. Google declined the request, and agreed to turn over 5,000 random search queries during the one week time frame. According to the EFF, Horvath was "publicly critical" of the first DOJ subpoena, claiming there were privacy concerns with such a large request.

The EFF first asked for the information using the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) at least six months ago, at the same time Horvath was preparing to leave the DOJ, but no data was turned over to the EFF. Now, a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia accuses the DOJ of violating the FOIA by not turning over the requested information in a timely manner.

"Google has an unprecedented ability to collect and retain very personal information about millions of Americans, and the DOJ and other law enforcement agencies have developed a huge appetite for that information," EFF Senior Counsel David Sobel said in a statement. "We want to know what discussions DOJ's top privacy lawyer had with Google before leaving her government position to join the company."

"Google did not work with Jane Horvath on this when she was at (the) Department of Justice," a Google spokesperson told BetaNews.

While it's possible Google feels like there is nothing to turn over since it reportedly did not work with Horvath directly, the EFF could have still filed a lawsuit even if Horvath wasn't hired by Google. The organization is concerned about the amount of information Horvath may have had access to before heading to Google.

The EFF wants all records of correspondence, including e-mail, phone calls, and other communications between Google and Horvath to be released immediately.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

Their thugs will back any loose cannon and defamer who intend to destroy the reputation of those that have been injured by that defamation.

http://w2.eff.org/legal/cases/Barrett_v_Rosenthal/

Their lawyers and those who were involved in this major lawsuit wracked up hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of legal fees to defend the right of Ilena Rosenthal to defame me personally and professionally. It is my firm belief and that of others that she participated in a conspiracy with Tim Bolen and others to ruin me professionally. Anyone who defends the EFF to carry on this campaign or any any other campaign can expect to be their targets the next time they speak out and tell the truth.

You may want to help defend the victims of their actions.

http://www.healthwatcher.net/war.html

Score: 0

|

Doing a search under your name I found some interesting things about you too.

Score: 0

|

What is your point kappen?

Score: 0

|

i commend the EFF and hope they win.

however, i'd bet a million of bill gates dollars that this iceburg of an issue will ultimately end up at the supreme court.

what likely needs to happen is for the bush administration to end, replace the kings appointed by the bush administration at the justice department with democratic ones in order to begin "breaking the ice from the inside"

Score: 0

|

A real beta process at work: Mozilla fires up Firefox 3.6 Beta 2

In the clearest sign yet that public input really does help the development process, a flurry of bug detections provoked Mozilla to release Beta 2 of the next Firefox.

Snow Leopard and Windows 7 still can't crack the netbook problem

Apple has killed Atom support in OS X 10.6.2 and Windows 7 Starter Edition is stripped of "basic" functionality.

Microsoft's Top 3 advances in Exchange Server 2010

The latest round of changes launched today will impact how admins deliver services to e-mail recipients, and how much companies will pay along the way.

Firefox turns five: Thanks for giving us a choice

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: No longer the phoenix rising from the ashes, Mozilla has carried on more than just Netscape's legacy.

Kindle for PC opens in beta, underwhelms

Amazon has opened the beta of Kindle for PC, a companion to the Kindle, but little else.

European ministers approve watered-down 'neutral net' language

The latest provision in the EU's telecoms regulatory framework would let businesses cancel individuals' Internet access, if they go to court first.

It's the US vs. the EU over Oracle+Sun and the meaning of 'open source'

Now that the EU is a virtual country, the US Justice Dept. is taking a stand in favor of its view -- and against the EC's -- that MySQL will survive under Oracle.

Qualcomm: $1.3 billion Samsung licensing deal unrelated to fair trade violations

Samsung has come to a 15-year licensing deal with Qualcomm over 3G and 4G wireless technology.

Nokia's 'limited number' of recalled chargers exceeds 14 million

Today, the Finnish phone maker has begun a recall of mobile phone chargers that are a shock hazard.

Ubuntu 9.10 upgraders report frustration

For those Wine aficionados out there, beware of the remote possibility that your Linux system could be infected by Windows-seeking malware.

Supreme Court considers patentability of abstract methods today

Can software that executes a formula for a business process qualify for federal patents? An appeals court already said no, and inventors are making their case.