Justice Department sued by EFF over Google privacy official

By Michael Hatamoto | Published February 29, 2008, 2:52 PM

The Electronic Frontier Foundation recently took aim at the Department of Justice, wanting all communications between Google and a former top privacy official who now works for the Mountain View-based Internet search giant.

Specifically, the EFF wants to know more about why Jane Horvath was chosen to become the company's senior privacy lawyer, and what may have influenced the decision.

?In February 2006, Horvath was appointed the Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer of the DoJ, and held that position until August 2007, when she announced she would leave the DOJ position to join Google and serve as Senior Privacy Counsel.

Also in 2006, the DOJ requested Google turn over information of every item searched for using Google for one week. Google declined the request, and agreed to turn over 5,000 random search queries during the one week time frame. According to the EFF, Horvath was "publicly critical" of the first DOJ subpoena, claiming there were privacy concerns with such a large request.

The EFF first asked for the information using the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) at least six months ago, at the same time Horvath was preparing to leave the DOJ, but no data was turned over to the EFF. Now, a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia accuses the DOJ of violating the FOIA by not turning over the requested information in a timely manner.

"Google has an unprecedented ability to collect and retain very personal information about millions of Americans, and the DOJ and other law enforcement agencies have developed a huge appetite for that information," EFF Senior Counsel David Sobel said in a statement. "We want to know what discussions DOJ's top privacy lawyer had with Google before leaving her government position to join the company."

"Google did not work with Jane Horvath on this when she was at (the) Department of Justice," a Google spokesperson told BetaNews.

While it's possible Google feels like there is nothing to turn over since it reportedly did not work with Horvath directly, the EFF could have still filed a lawsuit even if Horvath wasn't hired by Google. The organization is concerned about the amount of information Horvath may have had access to before heading to Google.

The EFF wants all records of correspondence, including e-mail, phone calls, and other communications between Google and Horvath to be released immediately.

Comments

Their thugs will back any loose cannon and defamer who intend to destroy the reputation of those that have been injured by that defamation.

http://w2.eff.org/legal/cases/Barrett_v_Rosenthal/

Their lawyers and those who were involved in this major lawsuit wracked up hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of legal fees to defend the right of Ilena Rosenthal to defame me personally and professionally. It is my firm belief and that of others that she participated in a conspiracy with Tim Bolen and others to ruin me professionally. Anyone who defends the EFF to carry on this campaign or any any other campaign can expect to be their targets the next time they speak out and tell the truth.

You may want to help defend the victims of their actions.

http://www.healthwatcher.net/war.html

Score: 0

|

Doing a search under your name I found some interesting things about you too.

Score: 0

|

What is your point kappen?

Score: 0

|

i commend the EFF and hope they win.

however, i'd bet a million of bill gates dollars that this iceburg of an issue will ultimately end up at the supreme court.

what likely needs to happen is for the bush administration to end, replace the kings appointed by the bush administration at the justice department with democratic ones in order to begin "breaking the ice from the inside"

Score: 0

|

Don't wait for Microsoft's patch: Secure Windows now from today's 0-day

Microsoft is recommending users simply get rid of a vulnerable ActiveX control that no one even uses any more. We'll show you how to do that right now.

Nokia: Android? Are you crazy?

Rumors about new Android devices abound, but Nokia squashes this one.

Symantec goes live with Norton 2010 betas

Norton Internet Security and Norton Antivirus 2010 are now available for testing.

What's Now: Drenched with 'Purple Ra1n,' iPhone users caught eating 'redsn0w'

Plus: Symantec and McAfee go to war, and what's LucasArts building in its top-secret, moon-shaped orbital facility?

In New York, online booze loses a Circuit Court decision

Court worried about gangster influence if liquor purchased directly.

British Telecom sacks bitterly unpopular Phorm ad platform

Phorm under BT is no more, but the targeted ad service could still go on under Virgin or TalkTalk.

CBS is the last man standing against Hulu

Popular streaming syndication site Hulu now has all the major networks in its camp except CBS.

Not just Vista: The operating system is dying, too

Carmi Levy: Wide Angle Zoom Vista's troubles point to a bigger shift that will affect more than just Microsoft.

Bolt: the dark horse mobile browser

Bitstream's small-footprint mobile browser is available in Beta 3

IE8 WSUS update push to begin August 25

After months of availability to users willing to seek it out, Internet Explorer 8 will be rolled into Windows Server...

Geeks vs. journalists: A tale of two worldviews

Recovery with Angela Gunn Why geeks think most mainstream journalism is flaky, and why the mainstream thinks geeks are trying to kill them. (They're both right.)

Can Linux do BitLocker better than Windows 7?

Betanews kicks off a new series with a look at how the Linux operating system's FDE stacks up against BitLocker, the Windows feature that today commands a $120 premium.

Windows 7 ISO Verifier 1.0

July 6 - 5:40 PM ET

ProgDVB 6.10.2

July 6 - 5:19 PM ET

FreeBSD 8.0 Beta 1

July 6 - 4:58 PM ET

K-Lite Codec Pack 64-bit 2.5.0

July 6 - 3:55 PM ET

SysCheckUp 1.4.0

July 6 - 3:34 PM ET