Legislation would force all new US radios to include digital 'HD'

By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published September 29, 2008, 5:24 PM

More digital radios, especially those installed with new automobiles, include the capability to pick up digital "HD Radio" broadcasts over the air. But should the government mandate that satellite radio sets include HD Radio capability?

Demonstrating that there actually were at least a few spare minutes for Congress after all, during the debate over the financial bailout plan, House Telecommunications Subcommittee Chairman Ed Markey (D - Mass.) introduced a bipartisan bill that will require all future AM/FM radios or satellite radio receivers made or sold in the US to also receive digital HD broadcasts.

HD Radio, though not necessarily "high-definition," refers to digital broadcasts in the "sidebands" that many US radio stations utilize to provide extra channels of programming. The effect is similar to new supplemental digital television channels, which enable alternate programs that can be picked up over the air. Currently, there's no requirement that HD Radio be built into new radio equipment, though more and more sets -- particularly in automobiles -- is including it.

The big change, therefore, would be for Sirius XM Satellite Radio, whose plans for now are to continue producing some radios for Sirius subscribers and other radios for XM subscribers. This bill wouldn't force satellite functionality to be interchangeable, though it would force the nation's sole satellite radio provider to open up alternate channels for commercial digital broadcast radio.

The language of the bill is very simple: It would amend the Communications Act of 1934 to "require that apparatus shipped in interstate commerce or manufactured in the United States that is designed to receive signals broadcast in both the satellite digital audio radio service and the terrestrial AM or FM radio broadcast service be equipped with technology that is capable of receiving and playing digital radio signals as transmitted by terrestrial AM or FM stations."

In a statement over the weekend, Rep. Markey said his objective was to ensure that future radios are still capable of providing listeners with local news.

"Millions of Americans today rely on local broadcast radio for news, public safety bulletins, sports, weather, traffic and other information," Markey stated. "As the broadcast radio industry migrates to digital broadcasting technology, this legislation will ensure that consumers are able to readily receive free service through consumer electronics systems that are otherwise receiving satellite digital audio radio and traditional AM or FM stations. Further, the recent merger of the only two satellite radio providers, XM and Sirius satellite radio, has underscored the importance of ensuring consumer access to a diversity of sources for digital radio content, in particular content originating in their local communities. My bill therefore simultaneously seeks to address the long-term competitive health of local radio while ensuring that their local, digital services are readily received by radio consumers."

As anticipated, the National Association of Broadcasters voiced its support for the bill. In a statement this afternoon, NAB President and CEO David K. Rehr said, "In addition to providing 235 million weekly listeners with entertainment and music programming, free local radio stations have a long tradition of serving as a lifeline during times of crisis. This legislation will extend and enhance these services as radio stations embrace our digital future."

Spokespersons for Sirius XM declined a direct comment on the matter, but instead pointed us to an article elsewhere that cites the fact that the Federal Communications Commission continues to study the possible impact of any HD Radio requirement on competition.

Last month, the FCC opened up a 90-day comment period for the public to comment on whether it believes competition may be affected by the onset of more federal regulation. That comment period remains open, even though Markey's bill was introduced right in the middle of it.

"As an initial matter, we seek comment on the extent to which the market is already making multi-functional radio receivers available to the public that include two or more of the following capabilities: SDARS, HD Radio, iPod/MP3, Internet, or any other technologies capable of providing audio entertainment services," reads the FCC's August 25 Notice of Inquiry (PDF available here). "How many of each type of multi-functional radio receivers are available today, including factory-installed receivers in automobiles and receivers later installed in vehicles in the so-called 'aftermarket?' How many multi-functional radio receivers are expected to be available in the near future without a Commission requirement? To the extent that multi-functional radio receivers are not available today and are not expected to be available in the near term, is this because of a lack of consumer demand for such receivers or some other reason? How does any lack of multifunctional radio receivers impact competition among SDARS, HD Radio, iPod/MP3, Internet, or any other technologies capable of providing audio entertainment services?"

After the FCC issued an order approving the transfer of assets from XM to Sirius, Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein issued a statement dissenting from that order, which included a warning about the HD Radio issue.

"While some proposed that we require HD radio technology be incorporated into all new satellite receiver models capable of receiving analog terrestrial radio, I proposed we require it only in subsidized models. That way, if there were truly an open market for devices, as an independent process for certification would have ensured, the market would determine whether to integrate HD radio into the devices," Adelstein wrote (PDF available here). "Where the merged company sought to alter market dynamics through subsidies or other mechanisms, it would be prevented from discriminating against competing HD radio technology. Instead, the Order allows the merged company to avoid subsidizing models that include HD radio, thus using their market power to thwart the very competition the Applicants [XM and Sirius] cited as justifying the merger."

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

finally they need to get rid of the old system. i mean i understand when technologies are new it needs time to reach people but after a while it should just become standard and move on. like how dvd's are now dominant in the market vs. vhs. vhs needed to die and it finally did. so this is the same thing old radio stations need to upgrade to a new better system. sometimes it must be done by force.

Score: 0

|

Communism anyone?

Score: 0

|

wth?

Score: 0

|

That word, I don't think it means what you think it means.

Score: 0

|

How do you figure?

Score: 0

|

Stop clowning around, I mean it! ;)

Score: 0

|

Anyone want to buy a peanut?

Score: 0

|

it's called embracing technology and the digital future..

Score: 0

|

Listen to more commercials in HD quality sound? No thanks I'll stick to MP3's, Internet Radio, or Sat Radio. Anyone one of the 3 are far better and I don't have to be forced to buy new equipment.

On another note. FM/AM is not free. If you take into account the mind numbing amount of time you waste listening to commercials waiting to hear 1 song every 20 mins or so.

Score: 0

|

This is BS. As long as the majority of radio listeners uses AM/FM, the radios will continue to exist, if it ever goes the other way, radios will be produced capable of it.

There is *no* need to legislate this. F'ing lobbyists can stick it where the sun don't shine.

Score: 0

|

who still listens to radio?

it's nothing but audiable crap.

Score: 0

|

Hundreds of millions of people, Oh Clueless One.

From ages 12 to 90, 64% of the US listens to the radio: http://www.reuters.com/a...11-Sep-2008+PRN20080911

Let's see, around 300 Million people in the US... about 192 Million.

That's who.

Score: 0

|

HD FM is a joke. I guess the thing that really gets me is Ibiquity (the company that makes the HD Codec) wants a piece of all the revenue generated from stations running subchannel audio. On top of all the licensing fees a station pays to get up and running with HD FM, they have to pay on-going fees...and it all will be mandated by the FCC.

Should have been an open-standard system...

-DW

Score: 0

|

Does that mean that I'll be able to get HD radio here in my mountain home? Heck, I can barely get AM and/or FM stations, and they fade in and out. Sometimes, to keep a radio signal readable, I have to hold the radio in my hand and turn it one way or another at different times. It appears the signal is coming from one direction one moment and another the next. Will HD radio do that, too?

Score: 0

|

hell no. this is very very BAD legislation and i am directly affected by this twice:

1. i am a satrad subscriber. if i wanted to listen to terrestrial radio, i would listen to my pocket radio. further, when i do listen to terrestrial radio, its am radio. you cannot get any audio accessory that has an am standalone or an am option. everything available is fm radio. i have no use for any of those audio accessories that offer fm radio as an option. if i wanted to listen to terrestrial radio i'm not doing it on my phone or mp3 player. and on that point...

2. the technology to have pocket hd radios is not good enough yet to A) get them down to the size of the radios i use which are right around the size of a credit card and 1 cm thick give or take a few mm and B) get them to where they are not enormous power hogs. i have one radio that can last a while on two AAA batteries and two that do the same on two AA batteries. if these chips are forced to go in all radios sold in the us, power consumption will go up and as a result, either the batteries will not last as long or more batteries will be forced to be used.

if congress is so wanting the failure known as hd radio down our throats, then what they should do is force a date where the analog am and fm signals are turned off. the sad thing about this is that the technology for digital radio itself is a great thing. but the reason that i am so down on it to the point of outright campaigning against it is because the reasons for it (having side channels) are limited severely in some areas and those that do have stations with side channels have those channels sound exactly like the main channel. if more stations offered up content that was completely different than what is currently offered up, hd radio would take off.

here's where you want sirius xm to win.

Score: 0

|

PDC 2009: What have we learned this week?

There was the freebie that no one will forget, the heebie-jeebies courtesy of Scott Guthrie, and a teensy bit clearer picture of how this cloud thingie should work.

Live report: Will Google Chrome OS change Linux?

The mysteries of just what Chrome OS is, and how much of an operating system it truly is, may be resolved today.

PDC 2009: Microsoft cares about Web browser performance

The effort to give users of the world's dominant Web browser the impression of quality, is a personal one for the man who leads that battle.

Nokia re-affirms its commitment to Symbian, sort of

Maemo won't necessarily be replacing Symbian in the Nokia N-Series, but that's definitely a place where it will be found.

E-book readers will be in short supply this holiday season

E-readers are hot this year, and a lot of compelling new products have been released, but are there enough electrophoretic displays to go around?

Sony looks to finally open a single storefront for downloads

Sony has had many different download portals for movies, music, e-books, and games, and now it's looking to make a single shop for all of it.

Tuning out the tablet: Time to give the endless speculation a rest

Wide Angle Zoom: Wishing and hoping and thinking and praying....won't put an iTablet on the market.

Five improvements for IT managers in 2010

If businesses are to improve their efficiency for next year, they need to stop and reassess the basic tenets of their job.

AOL's spinoff from Time Warner to shed 2,500 jobs

As AOL moves toward become an independent company again, it will cut nearly a third of its workforce.

Gartner: SMS-based money transfer will be bigger than mobile browsing, search

Gartner issues its predictions for the 10 things our phones will be doing in 2012.

Don't forget to upgrade to Firefox 3.6 beta 3 today

Mozilla has released the latest beta its Firefox 3.6 browser software, just over one week after beta 2.