Microsoft Answers Questions Regarding .NET Services
By David Worthington | Published October 8, 2001, 11:58 PM
Today Microsoft published a question and answer essay covering a broad array of information on its .NET Alert Services. Microsoft spinsters dwelled on the advantages the services had to offer especially the potential they offered toward bringing businesses and their customers together in closer relationships. Users can opt to receive financial alerts, reminders, reports on traffic conditions, and even track their success (or lack thereof) in eBay auctions. Some services have already begun to go live while other early adopters will deploy within the next six months.
In all, 19 sites have services in the works that are set to alert users via an integrated web of devices ranging from desktop PCs to mobile phones and handhelds. An explosion of services will go off alongside the launch on Windows XP on October 25th, providing users with a “hands on” glimpse of the .NET experience. Windows Messenger software is not set in stone as a requirement to take advantage of the alerts - email clients ranging from AOL to Lotus Notes and Microsoft's own Outlook. There is one catch for mobile users; MSN Mobile must be supported in order for the services to function.
Formerly known by the moniker "Hailstorm", the technology behind .NET My Services is built upon Internet standards such as XML (eXtensible Markup Language), and SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol). By using these standards, .NET services can interact with all compatible applications that meet industry guidelines. .NET alerts make up only a single component of a range of proposed services.
Microsoft claims that a minimal amount of user information will be stored on their servers that allow .NET alert services to be delivered, and that it will not, “mine, sell or share any .NET Alerts data.” Authentication information is encrypted through the MD5 protocol.
Even still, this may not be enough to pacify the uncertainty surrounding Web applications. As first reported by BetaNews, security firm WhiteHat Security uncovered a new form of attack that left the personal information, privacy, and security of Web users out in the open and under substantial risk. Critics argue that security is too lax and urge for public disclosure of vulnerabilities as the push toward Web-based services continues on.
For its part Microsoft has enlisted Verisign to provide additional security for sensitive transactions that are conducted through the .NET platform. In addition, competitors such as Sun Microsystems are backing Web services as well, making their role in the future a certainty.
I think this is the FAQ betanews is talking about:
http://www.microsoft.com...rvices/services/faq.asp
Score: 0
|The link you put here is talking about .NET [[ MY ]] Services.
The one BetaNews are talking about is .NET Services which My Services is just one of them.
I think this might be the link:
http://www.microsoft.com/net/qa.asp
Score: 0
|I would also like to see a "Q & A" session with the other ".NET clones", especially the one offered by AOL! Unless Microsoft's .NET is the only one that people are wanting to attack. I also wonder *how many* .NET "clones" are in the works, and by which companies? If only Microsoft's offering is going to be scrutinized and attacked, I guess the "clones" are totally secure, right?
James
http://belprecomputerwizard.com
Score: 0
|I had seen some time ago that IBM was working on a solution to .NET
Unfortunately I can't remember what the exact development technology was, but it was an IDE that operated on SOAP\XML, and Java I believe.
You might find more info here:
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/
Score: 0
|Yeah, IBM's WebServices (which are part of VisualAge Studio) comprimises of Java, XML and SOAP. The whole thing revolves around connecting to UDDI Registries (www.uddi.org) which store "White Pages" type of data, "Yellow Pages" type of data and I think they call them Blue Pages, but I can't remember now. Basically they store WSDL's - data which tells you how to connect, the methods you can call, what the responses will be etc.
SUN have their .NET alternative simply called One, and I'm sure there's a few others in the works but since all we hear about is .NET, that's all that will be reported on.
Score: 0
|I would really like to see more info on AOL's ".NET" clone. With all the crying they did to try and stop XP from releasing, I wonder just how secure AOL's offering is? Plus, what kind of info are they going to want? I already have a .NET passport- my MSN/Hotmail account. And we know just how much info you need to put in to get that!!
James
http://belprecomputerwizard.com
Score: 0
|Yeah, IBM (under Apache), Sun and others have web services stuff coming up.
The beauty of SOAP is that it's all interoperable. My .Net apps can talk to your IBM web services with no problems, and vice versa.
Score: 0
|Can we have a link to this Q&A essay?
Score: 0
|