Microsoft, FTC Bust Porn Spammers
By Ed Oswald | Published July 20, 2005, 3:04 PM
The Federal Trade Commission announced on Wednesday that it had charged seven companies with violating various laws related to the labeling of sexual content. Three of the suits seek civil penalties and to stop the organizations from sending out further spam. Four have already been settled, amounting to $1.2 million in penalties.
Microsoft provided assistance to the FTC in tracking down the defendants. "In particular, the FTC supplied Microsoft with a list of domains that were associated with thousands of pornographic spam messages and Microsoft analyzed these domain names against the millions of spam that Microsoft collects in its open 'trap accounts,'" a spokesperson told BetaNews.
The law under which the groups are being sued is something called the "Adult Labeling Rule." Under this law, sexually explicit spam is required to carry the phrase "SEXUALLY EXPLICIT" in the subject line of the message.
The FTC charged that the seven companies violated this law, as well as not providing a method for users to opt-out of the e-mails or providing a postal address.
The companies that have settled so far are BangBros.com of Florida, which settled for $650,000; MD Media of Michigan, settling for $238,743; APC Entertainment of Florida, for $220,000; along with Pure Marketing Solutions, of Florida, and Internet Matrix Technology, of Louisiana, who together will pay $50,000.
The identities of the companies with outstanding suits were TJ Web Productions in Nevada, Cyberheat in Arizona, and Impulse Media, a Washington corporation. The commission unanimously approved the filing of the complaints.
"This x-rated e-mail is electronic flashing," said Lydia Parnes, Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection. "It exposes kids and other unwary consumers to graphic sexual content, and it is unwanted, offensive, and illegal."
How about busting the stupid people sending out SPAM of prescription drugs? I get at least 4 a day that my ISP mail filter doesn't pick up.
Score: 0
|These fines are a start, but they need to be much more severe. I say take all profit they have made from this SPAM. If they have no profit and only overhead they will soon be out of business.
Score: 0
|This stance has been long awaited by many users of the internet for quite a few years now. It is a well known "trick" that one never even opts out of such spam. The minutest signs of response (of any kind) would give rise to a deluge of similar spam. Even if it didn't work with the "ignore it and it's bound to go away" attitude it did, at least have the effect that the volume of such material decreased quite noticably. It would be nice to be able to filter such mail although it's kinda routine to run one's antispam program and get rid of all of it in a couple of seconds. Such mail tends to dampen one's enthusiasm for the electronic highway. I can remember a time when one could connect to the predecessors to the internet without even the need for antivirus software. Like any good thing, it gets corrupted over a period of time. Pity. Now there is even a legal case against the use of spyware and adware. It would be a sensible move for the internet community to deal with all of these nuisances simultaneously so that future generations won't need to be concerned with it.
Score: 0
|