Microsoft Merges Internet and Desktop Search

By David Worthington | Published July 30, 2004, 10:01 PM

During its annual analyst meeting Microsoft Microsoft vice president Yusuf Mehdie demoed a new search engine that seeks out information beyond the Web and onto the hard drive. Mehdie showed off a prototype of the technology that was integrated into the MSN Toolbar add-on for Internet Explorer.

Microsoft's public disclosure of this new technology comes just days after Microsoft's MSN business unit launched a beta of its Newsbot, a cooperative venture with longtime partner MSNBC that scours through over 4,800 news sources. MSN is also in the process of developing its own algorithmic search engine to replace one licensed from Inktomi.

There is a multitude of reasons why Microsoft is so interested in search engine technology. In today's computing ecosystem massive storage is cheap, digital media is plentiful and the lines that segregated where the desktop ends and the Internet begins are dissolving. But there is one setback: finding contacts, pictures, e-mail, music and documents is increasingly difficult. Seeing this as an emerging problem that needs to be solved, solution providers including Google and Yahoo! are already seeking to act.

In the race to develop innovative new search technologies, Google and Yahoo! are no longer alone since Microsoft came to the realization that without an appropriate search mechanism it cannot keep up with the times and could miss out on opportunities for growth. So, in response to its late entry into the market, Microsoft has invested heavily in developing its own brand of search technologies - making it a high priority.

As a result, Google, the online search market leader, is widely believed to be public enemy number one in Redmond and Microsoft is devising a competitive strategy.

"Microsoft's responding to a threat from Google by building an application that takes advantage of Microsoft's presence in areas where Google has no presence--desktop apps, networks, the local e-mail store, and so on. But it's not pursuing the Netscape strategy--at least not yet. We'll see what Longhorn looks like," Directions on Microsoft Senior Analyst Matt Rosoff told BetaNews.

Longhorn, the highly anticipated next generation of Windows, will have search functions baked into its file system. Longhorn's storage service, code named WinFS, advanced the Windows file system so that it is an integrated store for relational data, data on files, and XML metadata. This opens the door for new ways to search within Windows to make it "search centric".

WinFS is codependent on future SQL Server and Visual Studio products called Yukon and Whidbey. Delays in these products are rumored to have caused Microsoft to scale back more ambitious plans for WinFS that take the service beyond individual desktops.

Critics of Microsoft have alleged including rich search technologies into Windows mirrors the integration strategy that was used to lock in the Internet Explorer Web browser as a de facto standard and topple Netscape.

"Even if Microsoft were pursuing the Netscape strategy to beat Google, I doubt this would attract U.S. regulators. According to the highest ruling authority in the DoJ case, there's nothing illegal about the Netscape strategy per se," said Rosoff. "In other words, Microsoft legally has the right to add a 'ham sandwich' to Windows (to quote Ballmer) as long as they don't strike deals with OEMs, IHVs, ISVs, and so on, to give unfair consideration to their ham sandwich in exchange for money or price cuts on Windows."

However, Rosoff did not rule out the possibility that upcoming Windows search technologies from Microsoft may attract the attention of regulators in Europe.

Whatever its implications, the technology currently showcased by Mehdi differs significantly from the "Netscape strategy" and Microsoft's practice of bundling Windows Media Player because it is not a part of Windows. Likewise, it does not expose any APIs that developers can use to build on top of. It is unknown whether or not a form of the technology will find its way into Longhorn.

A Microsoft spokesperson denied that it was gunning for its competitors, stating, "Our focus has been and will continue to be on building a search service that answers customer's questions. It's not about looking at competitors; it's about building great software for our customers."

The spokesperson continued, "MSN has updated its search user interface to enhance the online experience in response to overwhelming customer feedback. We are delivering customers an experience they have asked for. We believe the combination of a clean look that provides fast and easy access to the information people want will be a winner."

Representatives from Yahoo! and Google could not respond by press time.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

Forget the Microsoft haters. Almost EVERYBODY uses Internet Explorer ~despite~ irrational parochial bias of an elite few !

The real issue of this story is whether anyone actually wants (or needs) to search their hard drive simultaneous with a search of the Internet.

And, of course, the answer is "no". It's another 'ingenious solution to a non-existent problem'. If people had what they were looking for on their hard drive THEY WOULDN'T BE SEARCHING THE WEB IN THE FIRST PLACE !

Microsoft spends years and millions of dollars to "invent" features nobody asks for. At this rate -in a decade- Microsoft shall be reduced to selling tunes on the Internet !

Microsoft better get with it, and start developing products which meets needs.

The Computer Rodent

Score: 0

|

"lines that segregated where the desktop ends and the Internet begins are dissolving."

no, try it this way

"lines that segregated where the desktop ends and the Internet begins are being eroded by Microsoft."

It doesn't really matter what MS integrates into IE as http://www.CERT.org warns against using IE at all.

http://getfirefox.com and get control of YOUR experience

Score: 0

|

http://www.mozilla.org/firefox/why is another good firefox article

Score: 0

|

Why would it what CERT.org says about IE? I've never even heard of, much less been to that site. It could say Firefox was bad, doesn't mean I have to believe it.

Score: 0

|

You are all wrong. IE and FireFox both suck. Opera is the superior to all!

Score: 0

|

Duh, there are numerous sites that are not correctly rendered by Opera !!!!!!!!!!

Firefox is much better at rendering sites and contains no advertisements and doesn't cost 34 $.

Opera is at version 7.x while Firefox is not even at version 1.0 !

It's like compairing kitten to a cat and saying the cat is much better at catching mice! Ofcourse but wait till the kitten grows up. When the cat will be old and the kitten a young cat we will see who catches most mice ;-)

Score: 0

|

Well, as of right now (according to your interesting way of thinking), the old cat is catching more mice. ;)

Seriously though, I've been using Opera since version 5 and it's been getting better and better. Yea a couple sites don't render correctly, but I've seen a couple sites not render/work correctly in Mozilla either. Only IE is 100% compatible with everything out there, and IE is not even following standards, it's just that everyone is using it. Anyway, I gave FireFox a very generous and fair chance, and I just didn't like it. The tabs feel "slow" to me, the keyboiard shortcuts are all messed up, and I still have to see Mozilla/FireFox load pages faster than Opera. Bottom line, it's just not for me. I understand FireFox is customizable and all the missing "features" (or things I miss) from Opera could probably be added, but it's messy, plugins can conflict, and I simply don't have the time. That said, when I said Opera is superior it was an opinion, my opinion, just like how your opinion is that FireFox is better. So I say give everything a fair try (except IE, we all know that sucks) and see what works best for you.

Score: 0

|

Finally...at least someone is using Opera. I still use IE (see related comments about browser discussion on 'Microsoft plugs IE hole'), but if I had a choice between Netscape, Mozilla, Opera, and Firefox--Opera is the way to go.

Score: 0

|

Google Chrome 4: Yes, it's fast, but is it usable?

As Betanews readers have responded to our stories about Chrome's JavaScript superiority...Does that mean we'd actually use this browser? Well...

Video: Netflix on PlayStation 3

Netflix has come to the PlayStation 3 via Blu-ray and BD-Live.

Verizon Wireless launches new Android, Chocolate, and ruggedized phones

The lower-priced Eris joins the Droid, while the Chocolate gets a touchscreen and more music playback.

Early sales figures for Windows 7 nicely high, but do we know why?

Fans of triple-digit surges in figures quoted by Betanews will love this one, as it appears Microsoft rediscovered how to pull off a software launch.

Myka announces its latest Linux-based 'net top box'

Myka's ION brings Boxee, XMBC, and much more to HDTVs.

What hath Mac wrought? A remembrance after a quarter-century

The reason there's a Macintosh today is not because of some brilliant flash of engineering genius, but because Apple had the audacity to learn from its mistakes.

Early build of Moblin 2.1 improves connectivity, but not device support

The Linux Foundation's Atom-centric OS yesterday received a major overhaul with the project release of Moblin 2.1 for netbooks and nettops.

The iPhone's China syndrome: Sales of 5,000 and climbing

There's actually a country where Apple's device is not a godsend, where sales can be measured in the dozens.

New European counterpart to FCC will ensure 'a more neutral net'

Late Thursday night, the ruling telecom administrators of the EU's member nations signed away their final authority to a new entity overseen by the EC.

Sophos study suggests Windows 7 UAC's default setting is self-defeating

Without any anti-virus installed, a Sophos test showed, User Account Control was only capable of thwarting just one malware package out of ten samples chosen.

Indiscreet tweet trips awareness of Web SSL vulnerability

A group of high-level security engineers had been making progress on thwarting a low-level threat to the Web, until somebody blurted it all out on Twitter.