RSSMicrosoft Patches Six Vulnerabilities
By Ed Oswald | Published August 9, 2005, 3:33 PM
Microsoft released six security patches Tuesday as part of its monthly initiative to fix vulnerabilities within the Windows operating system. Three of the vulnerabilities have been marked "critical," one "important," and two as "moderate" in severity.
One of the critical software patches fixes a flaw within the print spooler that could allow for remote code to be executed.
The other two critical fixes are more severe in their possible consequences: one that corrects several vulnerabilities within Internet Explorer, and another that fixes a Plug and Play flaw. In a worst-case scenario, a hacker could exploit either flaw to gain complete control of an affected Windows system.
Microsoft also fixed a vulnerability in the Telephony Application Programming Interface, or TAPI, that could allow for remote code execution. The problem mainly affects users of Windows 2000 and Server 2003 who have manually enabled the telephony server feature of the operating systems.
Finally, two moderate risk issues were patched in Tuesday's release, including a flaw in the Remote Desktop application that an attacker could use to cause a Windows computer to freeze and crash, and vulnerabilities within Kerberos, an authentication scheme used by the operating system.
According to Microsoft, the worst of the vulnerabilities could result in a denial of service attack on the affected machine. Customers can download the patches immediately from the Microsoft Download Center or wait and receive them automatically through Windows Update.
Yep and these patches have successfully hosed my machine. It locks up every 15 minutes after installing them. Machine was running flawless until last Tuesday. No viruses or spyware either. Way to go MS. :(
BTW if you check out MS's newsgroups there are quite a few people having this problem.
Score: 0
How embarassing, microsoft is the most powerful, richest company, their operating system runs on 90 percent of computers in the world. How do you make mistakes, why are you so slow, why do you not inovate, why do you steal ideas, why dont you take your billion a month you make and reinvest it in your cash cow dripping pure diamonds of an operating system? I pray google and apple eat you alive slowly. They should have broke you up, maybe we would have some real competition, inovation and most important lower prices. All I have to say to back that up, look at how old, crusty, broken and frail your beloved internet explorer is. It took Firefox stealing 10 percent of your market share to even mention it. Yes I feel microsoft is evil in that they will only do anything for their customer base for CASH. No loyalty what so ever.
Score: 0
Like Linux doesn't have any security issues.....
Score: 0
You know cranberbers, google and apple are corporations too.
Score: 0
We've had major problems with the patches from Microsoft - can others comment - have you seen similar problems?
Running Windows XP SP2 on several machines:
1) McAfee 8 Virusscan no longer auto updates - running its update tool, informs us that the common framework won't run!
2) The search button on the start button doesn't do anything
3) Windows Installer no longer allows us to successfully install/uninstall anything.
4) The debugger in Visual Studio 2003 tells us we don't have permissions/access rights to debug even when we try it with admin priviledges!
We've seen this on several machines now and the only way we've been able to cure it is to do a system restore to "roll back" to before we installed the patches.
Just out of interest the set of patches we applied were KB's: 899588, 893756, 899591, 899587, 896423, 894391, 890830
Can anyone else share their experiences? Are these patches broken?
Mike
Score: 0
That's disconcerting news Mike. Personally, I haven't noticed those issues yet on my system. I'll check carefully when I get home later. BTW, isn't it possible just to un-install those updates, rather than do a System Restore?
Score: 0
Unofficial Preview of Windows XP SP3
http://www.windows-xp-sp3.host.sk
Score: 0
Carefactor: 0!
Does it exist: No!
Score: 0
hm, i see, that the page was updated today
Score: 0
How come I never saw them when I went to Windows Update?
Score: 0
Because the geniuses at microspud posted corrupted files and they had to shut off the downloads. They should be there now.
Quote
Download Problem Interferes with IE Patch Release
Microsoft late Tuesday confirmed that its "critical" Internet Explorer patches had to be pulled after a hiccup caused some of the downloads to be corrupted.
The glitch was detected by users attempting to install the IE patch from the Microsoft Download center.
"Shortly after we released the updates this morning we found that several of the Internet Explorer updates provided only to the Download Center were corrupted, breaking the digital signature and preventing them from installing," a post on the official Internet Explorer Weblog said.
"We've identified the problem, removed the affected updates from the Download Center, and will repost them shortly to correct the issue," said Jeremy Mazner, technical evangelist for Windows Vista and IE.
UnQuote
Score: 0
Thanks for the info sophist_dreams. *sigh* I guess I'll bite the bullet and install the other two (one addresses TAPI and the other remote desktop), just to play it safe. It just gets discouraging with these endless patches. I mean, will it ever end!? Has anyone seen the difference in speed between an unpatched XP O/S and a fully patched O/S? It's mind boggling.
Does anyone know if all the latest updates are required? I've got Remote Desktop and Telnet disabled, as well as the Server, Messenger and Remote Registry services. I'm appreciative of the patches, but if I don't need them, I'd rather not install them.
Score: 0
I certainly would, especially if you are a hardcore IE user
Quote
Microsoft has issued alerts on several security flaws in Windows, the most serious of which could allow an attacker to gain control over a computer.
The software maker released six security bulletins on Tuesday as part of its monthly patching cycle, describing three of them as "critical." The Redmond, Wash.-based company gives that rating to any security issue that could allow a malicious Internet worm to spread without any action required on the part of the user.
One bulletin addresses three vulnerabilities in the Internet Explorer, Microsoft's widely used Web browser. These issues carry the highest risk of attack out of all the issues fixed, Oliver Friedrichs, a senior manager at Symantec Security Response, said.
Two other flaws, affecting the plug-and-play feature and printing in Windows, could also spell some trouble for users, he said.
An error in the way IE handles JPEG images is especially alarming, according to Symantec. An attacker could commandeer a PC by crafting a malicious image and tricking the victim to look at it on a Web site or in an HTML e-mail, for example, Microsoft said in its MS05-038 security bulletin.
"These vulnerabilities can be leveraged by malicious Web sites to install spyware, Trojan horses, bots or other programs on an unsuspecting user's machine," Friedrichs said.
The other two IE flaws could also enable an attacker to take control of a user's computer. One vulnerability lies in how the browser handles URLs, related to a feature that lets users view file folders in IE. The other deals with the ability of IE to call on other parts of Windows and is similar to a problem patched last month.
UnQuote
Score: 0
Windows...the software equivalent of Swiss Cheese.
Score: 0
I think you've just found the intellectual equivalent, too...
Try Fedora Core Linux instead and try "yum update". :)
Score: 0
Currently, XP has fewer critical updates on a month by month basis, than most Linux distributions. Mac also has it's fair share.
Please get of your bandwagon and use your own transport.
Score: 0
IT IS OFFICIALLY HERE!!! BETANEWS IS NO LONGER STATING THAT ISSUES ALSO AFFECT XP SP2!
Seriously, I'm impressed. Maybe betanews think SP2 isn't so bad after all?
Score: 0
Most of the people complaining about SP2 probably had computer problems way prior to that, since I am estimating that 75% of computer users do not know how to properly maintain their operating system.
Score: 0
75% that a conserive estimate bleh427 i'd say its more like 90% ,as my day job i am a network engineer freelance. I have yet to come across a machine that is up to date.so far as patches go . and other software .. spyware addaware is the biggest culprt
I once found inexcess of 900 references of spyware,trojans and adware on a persons machine ... of which he was oblivious to.
Score: 0
Freelance network engineer? Does that mean you run spybot on your friends and neighbor's computers? Just kidding.
It is a pain. I manage about 2000 client and the users always say "this thing keeps popping up when i am trying to work, I just close it out." And trying to explain to them what adware and spyware or anything related to the normal operation of a computer is and they suddenly lock up. They are not responsible for the computers. We are. Why should they take time out of their busy schedule of playing solitare and trying to delete hidden files ( because they just didn't think they should be there) to think about updating their computer or run some type of malicious software removal application.
Sorry, a little venting. :)
Score: 0
"I once found inexcess of 900 references of spyware,trojans and adware on a persons machine" I hope you mean 900 of each, cause if not, that's not even worth mentioning until you found a machine with in excess of 3500 on one scan. haha Yeah that was one messed up system. 15 minutes to load it up, realized what the problem is, reboot to safe mode, and many scans later after it freezes several times, manually removing some of the programs because they interfear with my scan, and finally a clean fast machine.
Score: 0