Microsoft postpones live VM migration for Hyper-V two more years
By Jacqueline Emigh and Scott M. Fulton, III | Published September 9, 2008, 6:30 PM
(continued from previous page)
Also during this afternoon's demonstration in Bellevue, Microsoft COO Kevin Turner indicated that live migration could come in very handy down the road, as he articulated a new Microsoft strategy toward using its virtualization software for supporting clouds running in a choice -- and often a mix -- of three places: the customer premise, servers hosted by Microsoft partners; and servers hosted by Microsoft itself.
Beyond implying that users will eventually want to move some of their virtualization deployments from the customer premise to an outside host, as they grow more comfortable with external hosting, Turner also pointed to the pluses of virtualized servers for both server consolidation and quickly migrating applications to a different data center in case of a disaster.
Tom Bittman, an analyst at the Gartner Group, told the attendees that the "software as a service" orientation, utility pricing, and "elasticity" of cloud computing are now making their way into internally hosted enterprise applications as well as Internet-based clouds.
Virtualization is now "unlocking cloud computing" in both kinds of environments, according to the Gartner analyst.
Bob Muglia contended that Microsoft now offers the most "complete" set of virtualization products in the industry.
The three new products introduced today included Microsoft Application Virtualization 4.5; Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2008; and System Center Virtual Machine Manager 2008. Up to now, release candidates of the final SCVMM were only capable of working with something less than the final version of Hyper-V, though they could also work with software-hosted VMs built for Virtual Server 2005 R2.
Application Virtualization 4.5 will be bundled into Microsoft Desktop Optimization Pack 2008 R2.
Hyper-V Server 2008 -- a standalone version of the hypervisor in Windows Server 2008 -- will be available free of charge, according to Microsoft, and SCVMM will be distributed to System Center customers who have essentially already paid for it. Last month, Microsoft announced that VMM would be available separately from VMM, for a licensing fee of $675; that news was repeated today. Hyper-V Server 2008 will be geared to use with previous versions of Windows Server. Components will also be available for integration with SuSE Linux, the Linux OS produced by Novell, with whom Microsoft has an interoperability pact.
As competition heats up to become the underlying OS of choice for virtualized apps, Novell's main rival, Red Hat, last week announced the acquisition of Qumranet, the start-up behind the KVM (Kernel Virtual Machine) virtualization platform.
If they pretend to COMPETE in the virtualization market they are quite confused I would say. Bringing a subpar product to the market, and delaying for two whole years after a delay of a one year already features that are needed for this product to really compete won't get them to anywhere.
Didn't expect much of them anyway. I'm happy with ESXi already. :)
Score: 0
|Is BetaNews down? I haven't seen any new software updates for days.
Score: 0
|MSFT needs to stop pulling this crap if they want a cut of VMware's customer base.
VMWare is lightyears ahead of them now and they keep cutting the features that would make them competitive in this area.
One has to wonder what they are trying to accomplish here...
If it's failure, they're 100% on track to nail it.
Score: 0
|Heck, MS should wait until they get the concept of a Home Server that doesn't corrupt data down!
LOL!
Score: 0
|Yes, because virtualization and home server are two extremely similar product lines. Very nice insight!
Score: 0
|The primary function MS is addressing here is the virtualization of servers.
Having the common feature set that neither product, real or virtual, being ready for prime time despite their market announcements!
Hence the pattern...
Score: 0
|microsoft should do us all a favor and postpone that bill&jerry ad - requires more animation.
Score: 0
|MS should have employed the heirs of Hanna-Barbera instead of Seinfield to market their vaporware features. Like the Jetsons, lots of talk and what finally trickles out in 2/3 finished form little resembles the hype.
Yup, VMWare, you should be shaking in your boots.
Yeah, and we are still waiting for the features promised 13 years ago with Cairo...
Oops...but they killed Kenny, didn't they.
Yup VMWare, you should be hiding under the bed awash with fear...
Not.
Score: 0
|Same old sameo: slash major features from upcoming software / OS releases-- which still come in past deadline and unfinished.
Score: 0
|"... VMM would be available separately from VMM, for a licensing fee ...". ??!!??
Score: 0
|