Mozilla Fixes Firefox Protocol Handling

By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published July 31, 2007, 2:10 PM

This morning, Firefox 2.0 users were automatically notified of the availability of version 2.0.0.6, with the promise that this time around, a critical vulnerability concerning how the browser tries to parse malformed resource identifiers, is fixed for good.

In its security advisory this morning, Mozilla credited Windows security expert Jesper Johansson for articulating the original problem, which has hopefully led to this final solution.

"Jesper Johansson pointed out that Mozilla did not percent-encode spaces and double-quotes in URIs handed off to external programs for handling," the advisory reads, "which can cause the receiving program to mistakenly interpret a single URI as multiple arguments. The danger depends on the arguments supported by the specific receiving program, though at the very least we know Firefox (and Thunderbird) 2.0.0.4 and older could be used to run arbitrary script."

While Mozilla's admission was arguably gracious and sincere, there's a rational debate in the developer community over whether the real problem was caused by either major brand of Web browser -- Firefox or Internet Explorer -- or rather by the underlying Windows operating system which passes on the malformed argument in the first place.

Yesterday, the US-CERT bureau of the Dept. of Homeland Security indicated that Microsoft's handling of the ShellExecute() API function, which was changed in systems where IE7 is installed, may be the true culprit. The implication there is that a danger may continue to exist so long as that critical function can pass non-standard parameters to programs it's trying to launch, such as Web browsers.

The advisory then credits VeriSign security consultants Billy Rios and Nate McFeders for discovering that, when Firefox received a ShellExecute() call to the mailto:// URI identifier that included an officially disallowed null (%00) parameter, rather than launch the default mail client, Firefox would launch whatever application was responsible for the filename extension at the end of the URI.

Starting with version 2.0.0.6, Firefox will no longer launch external protocol handler applications without first asking the user. In the event that the site placing the external launch call isn't trusted, it won't launch any programs at all.

The exception is for the mailto:// protocol, where Firefox will launch the preferred mail client without asking the user. The advisory gives users a workaround, which involves editing the program's about:config page, for having Firefox ask the user before launching the mail client.

Comments

Or at least until it breaks again!
---> is fixed for good

Score: 0

|

This browser requires patches on a daily basis,I wonder could this be a sign.Yes friends, Opera is the way to go.

Score: 0

|

Opera is a fine browser, but Firefox renders pages way faster than it.

Score: 0

|

I'm cool with Firefox being updated on a regular basis. At least Mozilla recognizes these problems and fixes them fairly quicky, even if it does mean having to update twice in two weeks.

Anyways, I won't switch browsers just because it "requires patches on a daily basis."

Score: 0

|

Oh for crying out loud...so it gets patched daily - at no cost to you...

Deal with it!

If you don't like something then don't use it.

Don't even get me started on Opera...its java implementation sucks and it doesnt have as many options/plugins as most other popular browsers (see, do not like it when people bash your favorite product do ya?). That being said, Opera is pretty zippy due to its small size and lack of plugins - right now its off most exploiters radar due to its minimal popularity.

Score: 0

|

Canadian English is hard to understand. ^_^
I've updated my Firefox. I think its name should be changed to Firefix. ~~~~~~

Score: 0

|

I think you mean about:config on the last line, not about:.

Score: 0

|

I've always wonder if they use the Canadian spelling of that up north...

Is it "aboot:config"? :p

Score: 0

|

Silverlight 3 goes live on Microsoft's servers

Microsoft's answer to Adobe's Flash is (unofficially) here, with prospects of higher-speed, higher-resolution video and for the first time, 3D.

Three Android phones on the way from T-Mobile in 2009

T-Mobile's myTouch 3G, launched Wednesday, will be followed by two more Android phones later this year, but neither of them will be HTC's Hero.

Best Buy-brand TVs to get TiVo

A new alliance will place the retailer's own brand alongide the manufacturers, and could also lead to future partnerships on services.

LTE still lacks a voice

The 4G Wireless standard that Verizon hopes to show off before this year is out is still at a loss for (spoken) words.

Data sharing among online advertisers: Is sanity in sight?

Lockdown with Angela Gunn In the middle of a 15-page plea not to get regulated, a spark of smart thinking.

T-Mobile's strategy to combat Apple's iPhone with Android

With a trio of Android phones now in the pipeline for 2009, T-Mobile hopes to break the iPhone's emerging stranglehold.

EC's Reding: Government should act as broker for media downloads

If Internet media services don't step up and build an attractive way for users to start paying for downloads, a commissioner says, government may do the job instead.

Sony TVs get Netflix, still no PS3

Though it's coming in behind LG, Samsung, and Microsoft, Sony will begin to offer Netflix streaming, too.

Google Chrome OS: Too little, too early

Carmi Levy: Wide Angle Zoom Don't start the revolution just yet, says Carmi, who isn't so certain Chrome OS will be the "Windows Killer."

GAO pen test brings the hammer down on federal rent-a-cops

But are the computers to blame for the contract-guard fiasco at FPS?

What's Next: Chrome OS will have at least some friends in high places

Also: South Korea takes another round of DDoS abuse, and Neelie Kroes and Steve Ballmer may shake hands before she exits stage left.

Report: Evidence of further creativity with Windows 7 upgrade prices

A ZDNet blogger did some serious digging for clues as to a reported price break on multiple Windows 7 Home Premium licenses, and may have found it.