Netflix Antitrust Case to Continue

By Ed Oswald | Published August 23, 2006, 12:19 PM

Netflix's apparent attempts to force Blockbuster out of the online rental market were stopped for the time being on Tuesday, as a federal judge ruled that Blockbuster would be allowed to proceed with its antitrust case against Netflix. The lawsuit was filed in response to a patent infringement suit filed by Netflix in April of this year.

That case attempted to shut down Blockbuster Online through an injunction. Netflix claims Blockbuster infringes on two patents, one related to the automatic queue, and another that allows for the automatic receipt of new DVDs as well as reorganization of the queue.

In June, Blockbuster shot back at Netflix, filing an antitrust claim that alleged the company was attempting to monopolize the online DVD rental industry through litigation, and said the lawsuit was based on unenforceable patents. Blockbuster is also using the "prior art" defense in attempting to overturn the patents, a common defense in these cases.

Netflix petitioned the court to dismiss Blockbuster's claims, as well as split the lawsuits into different proceedings, and postpone the discovery process until after the patent issues are handled. U.S. District Judge William Alsup rejected all three motions, saying Blockbuster had a case, and no harm would be done by allowing both cases to proceed.

"Blockbuster may be forced out of the market, which would cede to Netflix virtually complete control of the online-DVD market," Alsup wrote. Netflix would, however, be allowed to refile for a dismissal later in the proceedings if it so desired.

Blockbuster said it was pleased with the ruling, and would continue to proceed on the antitrust claims. Netflix said it would continue to defend its business methods and intellectual property.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

Blockbuster shouldn't and can't win this case against NetFlix. U.S. District Judge William Alsup doesn't know what he's talking about saying they have a case.

Just because NetFlix better handles the automatic queues than Blockbuster Online, doesn't mean they're infringing on patents.

NetFlix is online rentals and Blockbuster have stores nationwide. Plus NetFlix is able to keep the prices at Blockbuster relatively low.

Score: 0

|

Ringmaster, are you even remotely familiar with the history of this case? You should be before making comments.

Regardless, Blockbuster is not suing Netflix because "NetFlix better handles the automatic queues than Blockbuster Online, doesn't mean they're infringing on patents". Netflix is suing Blockbuster saying that Blockbuster stole their queuing idea.

Blockbuster is countersuing saying that "Netflix... was attempting to monopolize the online DVD rental industry through litigation"

This, of course, points out your fallacious about "Blockbuster hav[ing] stores nationwide". The counter suit is not about retail stores but ONLINE distribution.

Your claim that "U.S. District Judge William Alsup doesn't know what he's talking about" would have more merit if YOU knew what you were talking about.

In summary, if you can't say anything intelligent, don't say anything.

Score: 0

|

Microsoft's Ray Ozzie: 'Nobody's going to be 100% open'

The mobile apps ecosystems of the world may converge over time, led by apps being ported over across platforms, according to the Chief Software Architect.

Will Firefox beat IE9 to Direct2D rendering?

Just days after Microsoft executives gave conference attendees a peek at a new rendering technology, a Mozilla contributor revealed he's working on the same thing.

Where there's smoke: Apple warranty stance raises troubling questions

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: Smoking can be dangerous not only for your lungs, it appears, but for your Apple hardware warranty.

AOL's decision to rebrand as Aol. takes a bad brand and makes it worse

The idea behind the social Web is to crowd source before bringing out something new. But not at AOL, which new logo debuted with a cry of "fail!" across the blogosphere and Twittersphere today.

Microsoft 'worked with Apple' for Silverlight on iPhone, says Goldfarb

By not making such a big deal out of trying to stream video to the iPhone, Microsoft got a big deal out of it, revealed the Silverlight product manager.

Clicker.com cuts through the Web video chaos

In a world where homemade video and Hollywood movies travel the same pipeline, it's good to have a real search engine to cut through the clutter.

A case study in improving software: What Office 2010 can learn from Notion 3

A music composition product gambles with a complete overhaul, in an effort to make headway against two well-known competitors in a tough market.

Kindle 2 update adds battery life, native PDF reader

Amazon has pushed out an update to the Kindle 2 e-reader that lengthens battery life and adds a native PDF viewer.

Safari on iPhone gets competition from a $1 browser app

Apple likes to say it gives iPhone users a full browsing experience, but a new competitor tries to incorporate more desktop browser features.

Action Replay maker sues Microsoft for Xbox 360 'predatory technological barriers'

Third-party video game accessory maker Datel has filed an antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft over the Xbox 360's recent Dashboard update.

Microsoft's Bob Muglia and Ray Ozzie on Silverlight vs. standards

Bob Muglia: "We're trying to provide people with an environment that has capabilities that you just simply can't do today in the standards-based world."