New AOL Service Moves Past Passwords

By David Worthington | Published September 21, 2004, 1:20 PM

For some AOL users, passwords have just become the computing dinosaurs. America Online has partnered with RSA Security to create AOL PassCode, a premium service that secures and manages AOL ScreenNames.

AOL PassCode utilizes RSA's SecurID two-factor authentication scheme where a random six-digit numeric code is generated in intervals of 60 seconds from a keychain sized device. AOL claims that this added safeguard provides a second level of account protection.

The service is primarily directed toward small business and customers who pay bills and manage funds online. PassCode costs an additional $1.95 USD per month, with a one-time service fee of $9.95 USD.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

For a major internet service provider, they shouldn't make this service a choice between increased security and higher prices. Their prices are already high enough. It should be AOL's obligation to give their costumers the highest security available as a fundamental feature, not an add-on. A very poor choice for AOL.

Score: 0

|

agreed, although I don't know that aol has made any great choices since they merged with time warner. Oh well...I don't use aol anyway.

Score: 0

|

AOL charges $23.95/month for internet service and when they finally have a useful feature available they want people to pay extra money for it, lol.

Score: 0

|

Where do I get this new thing? I'm an AOL member.

Score: 0

|

Honestly.. they have for Remote Hosts, and the like. Previously, it was a dongle that connected to the PC.

Score: 0

|

It doesn't make a heck of a lot of sense to use strong authentication for America Online users. What are you protecting?

I understand AOL using SecurID for their employees and moderators, companies using challenge-response for their corporate data, banks promoting one-time-passwords for online banking.

But what is there to protect on an AOL account? Your inbox and IM history?

Score: 0

|

Its all about protecting your online identity.

Score: 0

|

You're joking, right? Billing information, personal emails, etc... the same you can glean from any account. Members have just as important information as employees. Protecting AOL as a whole is crucial. Smart move by AOL. I mean, they're only the LARGEST target on the Internet. Any steps to protect their members are not only responsible of them, but expected.

Score: 0

|

I have not entered my password to AOL in months. I got a fingerprint scanner and using software allows me to place my finger down and it will enter the password for me. Neat stuff.

Score: 0

|

you cool, man. where can i get a gadchet like that?

Score: 0

|

But that has nothing to do with this. With AOL PassCode, you need to still need to enter your password and then the number found on the RSA device. It's adding another layer of protection.

Score: 0

|

The article I read indicated that passwords were still required in addition to the code generated by the RSA device. Doesn't sound like this would appeal to most AOL users, but I could be way off base here. Especially with the extra cost.

TowerDave

Score: 0

|

This honestly doesn't sound like something that thousands of users are awaiting to jump on... Unnecessary in my opinion.

Score: 0

|

This honestly doesn't sound like something that thousands of users are awaiting to jump on... Unnecessary in my opinion.

Score: 0

|

Fingerprint scanning only protects someone thats trying to do something on your computer. It's not like AOL has to scan their fingerprint to pull up your information. So that's usless in this post.
As far as the extra security for AOL, really it's only protecting unathorized access, if I had your password, I don't have access to your billing information, I could change it, but not view it.
This new feature is strickly to keep unathorized users from accessing your account. I feel the real problem is internally.

Score: 0

|

PDC 2009: What have we learned this week?

There was the freebie that no one will forget, the heebie-jeebies courtesy of Scott Guthrie, and a teensy bit clearer picture of how this cloud thingie should work.

Live report: Will Google Chrome OS change Linux?

The mysteries of just what Chrome OS is, and how much of an operating system it truly is, may be resolved today.

PDC 2009: Microsoft cares about Web browser performance

The effort to give users of the world's dominant Web browser the impression of quality, is a personal one for the man who leads that battle.

Nokia re-affirms its commitment to Symbian, sort of

Maemo won't necessarily be replacing Symbian in the Nokia N-Series, but that's definitely a place where it will be found.

E-book readers will be in short supply this holiday season

E-readers are hot this year, and a lot of compelling new products have been released, but are there enough electrophoretic displays to go around?

Sony looks to finally open a single storefront for downloads

Sony has had many different download portals for movies, music, e-books, and games, and now it's looking to make a single shop for all of it.

Tuning out the tablet: Time to give the endless speculation a rest

Wide Angle Zoom: Wishing and hoping and thinking and praying....won't put an iTablet on the market.

Five improvements for IT managers in 2010

If businesses are to improve their efficiency for next year, they need to stop and reassess the basic tenets of their job.

AOL's spinoff from Time Warner to shed 2,500 jobs

As AOL moves toward become an independent company again, it will cut nearly a third of its workforce.

Gartner: SMS-based money transfer will be bigger than mobile browsing, search

Gartner issues its predictions for the 10 things our phones will be doing in 2012.

Don't forget to upgrade to Firefox 3.6 beta 3 today

Mozilla has released the latest beta its Firefox 3.6 browser software, just over one week after beta 2.