Nvidia in trouble: 60% lower revenue, will reduce chip starts

By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published February 11, 2009, 12:28 PM

In one of the most dramatic representations yet of the downturn in the global economy, GPU maker Nvidia's entire fiscal 2009 dove deep into the red ink, turning a banner year into a red flag in just one quarter.

If it hadn't have been for the economy, Nvidia's year would actually have turned out okay. But a $147.6 million loss for just the quarter ending last January -- its fiscal Q4 2009 -- dipped the entire year into the red to the tune of $30.

"Our sell-in was less than the channels sell-out," reported Nvidia CFO Marvin Burkett yesterday (our thanks to Seeking Alpha for the transcript). "We believe current channel inventory is only slightly more than one month, down from almost three months last quarter. ASPs [average selling prices] across the board were relatively unchanged from the prior quarter, so the decline in revenue was primarily a reflection of the decline in unit volume."

In other words, builders aren't buying, in a very big way, and it's builders who constitute the bulk of Nvidia's customers. As a result, fiscal 2009's total year profit is down 37% over fiscal 2008, due in major part to the last quarter reaping 60% less revenue over the previous year's Q4, and gross profit (before expenses) that's down annually almost three-fourths.

The cause: Somehow, you knew Nvidia would find a way to blame Intel. This time, it's the rise of the netbook -- a PC form factor that doesn't need, or have room for, discrete graphics chips.

"All of a sudden the Atom processor has driven a dramatic surge of netbook PCs," stated Nvidia CEO Jen-Hsun Huang yesterday. Echoing language from Microsoft last week, Huang went on, "Some people call it a netbook PC but the fact of the matter is they're inexpensive PCs. And during difficult times many people who still need to have a PC or would like to have a PC now has a very inexpensive version to buy. And so the demand for Atom PCs and these net books if you will has really, really surged.

"I think what's going to happen is that the low end part of the marketplace is going to cannibalize the mid-range part of the market," Huang continued. "And people who want performance still will go for performance. The netbook will hardly serve their needs. But for a lot of people in the mid-range part of the marketplace the net book is clearly, clearly going to disrupt that."

Huang's solution to the problem involves two phases, one of which employs an if-you-can't-beat-them-join-them approach. Nvidia will be putting more emphasis on its Ion graphics chipset introduced in December, in an effort to leverage the success of Atom to create a platform that rests on Atom.

The second involves further investment of resources in departments other than conventional discrete GPU cards, with one of them being its own Tesla "desktop supercomputer." It was launched in June 2007, but Nvidia executives reported yesterday that the system "continues to ramp," without providing much further detail.

Huang also reported "some progress" with Tegra, the company's planned low-power processor for mobile computing devices (we don't want to call them "netbooks" just yet). It's still planned for shipment in the second half of the calendar year, though analysts appeared skeptical yesterday that such devices would have a significant impact on margins -- a number which, for now, is negative.

While Nvidia touted its innovative new designs, customers shouldn't expect to see very many instantiations of them in the coming quarter. As CFO Burkett found himself admitting yesterday, "We have significantly cut back our [wafer] starts. I don't think that's a surprise to anyone. When you have this inventory level we don't need a lot more wafers."

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

netbooks are an extreme niche. one i really enjoy, but not one that will replace the "mid-range" notebook mom and pop will buy. i dont see how netbooks are negatively affecting nvidia to the point of breaking their yearly profit.

their 1st generation GTX200 series cards were extremely fast, but had a relatively very high failure rate. i also had one arrive DOA, but it was a common occurance across the world. also, the huge lawsuit or whatever against them for their failing mobile chips was a nice chunk of change not to be ignored.

in terms of desktop GPUs, nvidia is still selling a LOT of chips. AMD put much more pressure on them last year than the previous 2 years, so market share of 2008 sales may be down, but they definitely weren't hurting from this. The fabrication process, on the other hand, was very expensive for the GTX200 series, and probably cut profit margins dramitically. pressure from AMDs similarly performing parts and lower price points caused nvidia to cut prices much earlier than expected. this meant pure margins cuts due to not enough time to shrink operating costs, as is how many price cuts come about for current generation parts.

Score: 0

|

:) ... LOL ...
I agree .. Nvidia has messed up their last few releases
with bad designs. The only thing saving them now is
loyal customers and they have better driver support
then ATI ..

Right now ... ATI drivers are getting better and I'm looking
forward to there new 40nm chips ....

Score: 0

|

lol, nothing to do with the economy, everything to do with fear of burned out chips and cards they shipped the last few years

and yes, i had their chip fail on me, in an Acer laptop, as i'm sure many others have

Score: 0

|

"I think what's going to happen is that the low end part of the marketplace is going to cannibalize the mid-range part of the market," Huang continued.

Hmmm.
Nope, can't be. 'We' were earlier informed that this was simply not the case regarding how Netbooks were saving the PC industry.

;-)

Score: 0

|

Security firm: Windows patches not responsible for 'Black Screen of Death'

On second thought, maybe that access control list thingie with the lockdown something-or-rather didn't trigger an alleged, perhaps non-existent, pandemic.

My Windows 7 confession (and why you should confess, too)

I've held back the real reason for sticking with Windows 7, even as, gulp, iLife calls me to go back to the Mac.

Apple settles with Psystar except for 'circumvention devices'

The fracas with the Florida clone computer maker might have ended today had Apple not have muddled the issue over a cheap piece of Psystar software.

Where did Apple's Black Friday sales go?

According to one analyst, Apple sold nearly four fewer Macs per hour on Black Friday than same day a year ago. Now why is that?

Google begrudgingly adjusts news crawling for paid publishers

If publishers want to make readers pay for news content, and thereby drive down its popularity and Google ranking, the company says, they can just go right on ahead.

Fee or free? Murdoch, Huffington square off over the cost of Internet news

Participants in an FTC workshop yesterday witnessed the two extremes of the Web news publishing debate, still centered on the issue of long-term profitability.

Microsoft denies latest 'Black Screen of Death' claims

After an anti-malware producer announced a fix to what it says is a swarm of recent KSoD problems, evidence of the swarm itself has yet to turn up.

Latest Firefox 3.6 beta fixes 133 bugs, promises faster page load times

A once-sluggish beta testing process has kicked into overdrive, with astonishing success at finding serious bugs. Will Mozilla be able to fix all the others in time?

Confirmed: Office 2010 to ship in June

Two weeks after Microsoft had been expected to draw a clearer roadmap for its principal applications suite, it's finally ready to commit to the end of H1.

New EU antitrust commissioner will oversee Microsoft, Oracle+Sun, Intel issues

As one of Europe's most prominent politicians shifts positions in January, her replacement remains a question mark over technology's biggest issues.

Without its own 'iTablet' yet, is Apple missing the boat?

Steve Jobs is on record as dissing "single-purpose" devices like e-readers. But given their recent popularity, was that a mistake?