Oracle CEO Ellison destroyed critical e-mails, judge rules

By Jacqueline Emigh | Published September 4, 2008, 6:51 PM

In charges stemming from a 2001 shareholders suit, a federal judge found this week that Larry Ellison deliberately withheld evidence that would have shown his awareness of problems surrounding Oracle's finances and its Suite 11i software.

Oracle CEO Larry Ellison has been found by a federal judge to have destroyed e-mails and withheld recorded interviews that could have been used against him. This in connection with a shareholders' suit charging Ellison with making false financial statements.

US District Court Judge Susan Y. Illston ruled on Tuesday that Ellison's e-mails, along with a journalist's recordings of interviews with Ellison, had been willfully withheld from lawyers for the shareholders who sued him.

Oracle shareholders launched the suit against Ellison -- the fourth richest person in the US -- in March 2001, alleging he lied in financial statements contained in the company's 2001 second quarter financial results. Prosecutors contend that Ellison knew about problems related to the company's finances, as well as its Oracle Suite 11i software product, and that he intentionally sold $900 million in Oracle stock before disclosing the difficulties publicly.

Judge Illston ruled in San Francisco yesterday that the materials allegedly destroyed or withheld -- which included recorded interviews for a book about Ellison entitled Softwar: An Intimate Portrait of Larry Ellison and Oracle -- were potentially relevant to shareholders' charges.

"The court believes it is appropriate to infer that the e-mails and Softwar-related materials would demonstrate Ellison's knowledge of, among other things, problems with the Suite 11i, the effects of the economy on Oracle's business and problems with defendant's [Ellison's] forecasting models," she wrote.

In the shareholder suit, Ellison did relinquish 15 of his own e-mails. Another 1,650 e-mails from Ellison were turned over from the files of other Oracle employees. However, both Ellison and Oracle had a duty to preserve e-mails after the shareholders' suit was filed, and many e-mails from after March of 2001 were missing, Illston said.

The shareholders had also requested 135 hours of recorded interviews from March, 2001 to August, 2002 for Softwar. The author of the book, Matthew Symonds, allegedly destroyed the digital recordings by telling a computer repair shop to throw away the notebook PC on which the interview transcripts were stored. Ellison then turned over 200 pages of written transcripts from 2002, but he did not turn over any transcripts from 2001, according to the judge's decision.

A trial in the case against Ellison, brought by the Nursing Home Pension Fund, is slated to start on March 30, 2009.

Illston ruled this week that, as a penalty to Ellison, jurors in the case will be instructed to assume that Ellison knew about problems related to Oracle's finances and Suite 11i. The judge also said she will take this assumed knowledge into account when she makes decisions about investors' claims for damages and Oracle's attempts to get the case dismissed.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

And the desktop gamer crowd here only whines about Gates and Jobs.

Ellison is a real sweetheart who makes both of them combined appear to be a puppy dog.

Score: 0

|

I guess at oracle they don't have good backups.. come on it was only 900M in stock..

Score: 0

|

Ooops!

Score: 0

|

Did the computer repair shop really throw away the laptop? That would seem to be a waste. More likely that they wiped it and reused or resold it.

Score: 0

|

Ok so being that he's not the first person to ever do this, not by a long shot.
But what I'm interested in knowing is now that the verdict at least on this part of the case is in, is it really a big deal, would of it been far more damaging if he did not destroy the e-mails and recording and turn them in ?

Score: 0

|

Mark Russinovich on MinWin, the new core of Windows

The next version of Windows three years hence will likely build onto a significant architectural change implemented in Windows 7 and Server 2008 R2.

Security firm: Windows patches not responsible for 'Black Screen of Death'

On second thought, maybe that access control list thingie with the lockdown something-or-rather didn't trigger an alleged, perhaps non-existent, pandemic.

My Windows 7 confession (and why you should confess, too)

I've held back the real reason for sticking with Windows 7, even as, gulp, iLife calls me to go back to the Mac.

Apple settles with Psystar except for 'circumvention devices'

The fracas with the Florida clone computer maker might have ended today had Apple not have muddled the issue over a cheap piece of Psystar software.

Google begrudgingly adjusts news crawling for paid publishers

If publishers want to make readers pay for news content, and thereby drive down its popularity and Google ranking, the company says, they can just go right on ahead.

Fee or free? Murdoch, Huffington square off over the cost of Internet news

Participants in an FTC workshop yesterday witnessed the two extremes of the Web news publishing debate, still centered on the issue of long-term profitability.

Microsoft denies latest 'Black Screen of Death' claims

After an anti-malware producer announced a fix to what it says is a swarm of recent KSoD problems, evidence of the swarm itself has yet to turn up.

Latest Firefox 3.6 beta fixes 133 bugs, promises faster page load times

A once-sluggish beta testing process has kicked into overdrive, with astonishing success at finding serious bugs. Will Mozilla be able to fix all the others in time?

Confirmed: Office 2010 to ship in June

Two weeks after Microsoft had been expected to draw a clearer roadmap for its principal applications suite, it's finally ready to commit to the end of H1.

New EU antitrust commissioner will oversee Microsoft, Oracle+Sun, Intel issues

As one of Europe's most prominent politicians shifts positions in January, her replacement remains a question mark over technology's biggest issues.

Without its own 'iTablet' yet, is Apple missing the boat?

Steve Jobs is on record as dissing "single-purpose" devices like e-readers. But given their recent popularity, was that a mistake?