Oracle Debuts its VM Virtualization Software Amid New Competition
By Michael Hatamoto | Published November 13, 2007, 3:21 PM
You'd think there was a virtualization conference this week. But as it just so happens, three companies are vying for status in this growing market: market leader VMware, the perennial up-and-comer Microsoft, and a newcomer with a familiar ring to it: Oracle.
"The virtualization market is exciting right now, and we're glad to be a part of it," an Oracle representative told BetaNews at the Oracle OpenWorld conference in San Francisco. There, Oracle unveiled Oracle VM, a virtualization program promoted as three times as efficient against compositing products.
Oracle VM is a free download and will be available starting tomorrow morning.
"Since [we] believe many VMware customers use different Oracle software solutions," the representative continued, "we look forward to seeing what happens later down the road."
Oracle VM should effectively help the world's second-largest software maker wage war against the other established companies working in the virtualization sector. Allowing greater flexibility for system administrators, it was designed for both Microsoft Windows and Linux. "We've done thousands of hours of testing" to make certain Oracle VM works in Linux, stated Oracle's Linux engineer Kurt Hackel. Users will be able to use a Web-based management console to easily migrate and manage applications that run on physical or virtual servers.
Oracle has chosen the Xen hypervisor, created from XenSource, which is now a subsidiary of Citrix Systems. It's been certified to run Oracle Database, Oracle Applications and Oracle Fusion Middleware. The company plans to provide 24/7 user support for $499 per year for single or dual CPU-systems, or $999 per year for systems with an unlimited amount of CPUs.
To counter the Oracle VM announcement yesterday, VMWare today unveiled VMware Server 2, "the next generation of the company's easy-to-use, free-of-charge virtualization product." Supporting more than 30 operating systems, system managers will be able to utilize USB 2.0 technology while using up to 8 GB of RAM for each virtual machine. The latest offering from VMware also lets users partition a single physical server into multiple virtual machines.
The VMware Server 2 beta is available immediately from the VMware web site. The final version is expected to be released sometime next year.
In a statement to reporters this afternoon, VMWare vice president for alliances Parag Patel officially welcomed Oracle to the virtualization market, but in its own special way: by painting a picture of it as just another implementation of something that's already available.
"There are at least five variants of Xen available to customers today," Patel said. "Oracle's will be the sixth. We believe customers want a consistent approach to virtualization that has a proven track record with mission-critical deployments and a complete offering."
Microsoft also unveiled details regarding its Hyper-V virtualization technology, previously codenamed "Viridian." Hyper-V Server is expected to follow within six months of Windows Server 2008's release, and is designed to offer a low-cost method to virtualize servers.
Hyper-V will eventually end up bundled with Windows Server 2008, with eight versions expected to launch in late February. The Standard, Enterprise and Datacenter editions of Windows Server 2008 will include Hyper-V. As BetaNews reported yesterday, users who choose a product without Hyper-V will not be able to later upgrade to the full version of Windows Server 2008, since they are "separate products."
Meanwhile, as a Microsoft spokesperson told BetaNews yesterday afternoon, Hyper-V Server (yes, there's a difference) is the separate virtualization product for consolidating multiple workloads onto a single physical server. It will sell separately for $28, and already the company's having a hard enough time distinguishing the two.
Interesting that oracle.com seems to be down right now
Score: 0
|Opera build 4529 would work great with that. How come no one is talking about parallels, except for the sales clerks at the mac store? Anyway I would recommend Opera 4529 which just came out this week for mac and the new Opera for windows. And I recommend Ubuntu linux? Which vmware can run all three..?
Score: 0
|Go ESX VI3 or go home.
Score: 0
|"Will Oracle support customers who are using Oracle products on other x86 server virtualization environments?
Oracle VM is the only x86-based server virtualization environment on which Oracle products are supported."
- http://www.oracle.com/te...zation/docs/ovm-faq.pdf
Ready, set, FAILURE.
Thanks for the attempt Oracle.
Score: 0
|Second that. What about people who already virtualized their Oracle DB ?
You're not going to make yourself friends, Mr. Oracle...
Score: 0
|Sorry to say but Oracle you are too new to the game and can't be trusted.
I have tested a lot of different virtualization products but I wouldn't trust it to anyone other than VMWARE. Sorry thats the most clear winner and the Vmware server is FREE AND WORKS WELL.
Score: 0
|except when it doesn't. I have had more problems with VMware than VirtualPC and VirtualBox put together.
Score: 0
|The products you mention are definitly not used for the same purpose... Try to use VirtualPC for a virtualized redudant Citrix server, I doubt it will work fine.
Score: 0
|Name some.
Score: 0
|Well, VMWare Server doesn't work that well either. :P
Score: 0
|Why doesn't it?
It's not a type-1 hypervisor but for a test lab it works just fine for pretty much anything you can throw at it.
For mission critical theres ESX.
Score: 0
|I was, of course, talking about ESX... And I confirm that *almost* everything works just fine in a production envrionment (the "almost" refers specially to large Oracle DB... That's why I'm curious to see how Oracle's going to handle the virtualization)
Score: 0
|Virtualization is nuts. I did not know VMware or virtualization existed 6 months ago. Now I am getting ready to setup a home server with virtualization.
My ISP will probably ban me from using bandwidth but I am starting to look forward to the challenge of a home network with a server and multiple applications (read games) running on the server.
Score: 0
|Failure - No way. How many companies can offer support from os thru middleware and database layers with lots of benefits? If you understand the bigger picture (and there is a lot more than I have mention including open standards and a lot of class leading features) then you will appreciate how significant this solution is. I do not work for Oracle. PS: Wasn't OS2 better than Windows at the start?
Score: 0
|There is no benefit to those that have standardized on other platforms (VMWare, Xen, etc). I'm not going to run (and be forced to manage) Oracle VM just so I can use OracleDB (or insert any other Oracle product here) in a VM. I'll go Bare Metal if I MUST use Oracle, or I'll consider SQL or MySQL instead since I can virtulize them any way I please.
This is just another attempt to lock customers into Oracle platforms.
Score: 0
|