Orange France admits to capping iPhone 3G speeds

By Jacqueline Emigh | Published August 28, 2008, 12:22 PM

Hit with a petition from thousands of irate French customers, wireless operator Orange has reportedly admitted to throttling download speeds for the iPhone 3G, and is promising some relief by September 15.

According to France Info -- the online service of Radio France -- iPhone carrier Orange has now admitted to a policy of restricting download speeds to only 200 to 300 Kbps.

"3G+ -- with which the iPhone is compatible -- can theoretically reach speeds almost four times higher," according to an account in the French publication, translated into English via Google's translation engine.

When contacted by France Info, however, Orange admitted that download speeds on the French network has been "deliberately limited" to no more than 384 Kbps.

Then, "after a technical meeting held Monday evening at the headquarters of Orange in Paris, the operator [promised] that the [download speeds] of iPhones will be increased up to 1 Mbps from 15 September," France Info said. "This bonus speed [will] be implemented automatically without the need [for] users to have to re-configure their devices."

As previously reported in BetaNews, users in France have been complaining that Orange France performs slow downloads to Apple's new iPhone, when much higher speeds are possible on competing STR's mobile network in France. Meanwhile, in an informal survey by Wired, users in the neighboring countries of Germany and the Netherlands reported the fastest 3G download speeds worldwide, amounting to roughly 2,000 Kbps.

Orange's decision to raise download speeds to 1 Mbps (1,000 Kbps) came one day after a group of angry French customers started circulating a petition. Now signed by more than 4,500 users, the petition demands that "Orange respects today its contractual commitment allowing [access] to [3G+ for] subscribers who pay for it."

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

Laughable. :
France Info said. "This bonus speed [will] be implemented automatically without the need [for] users to have to re-configure their devices."

This is pathetic. Of course they wouldn't need to reconfigure their devices...this is a server-side setting...not client. They are simply trying to get a small 'win' for something that they blatantly did against customers. They probably couldn't support the bandwidth and simply wanted to get the revenue that the iPhone could bring them. Now they really screwed themselves. I'm surprised, knowing the French, that they didn't just abandon ship and runaway.

Score: 0

|

France Info's article focuses on the iPhone, but the bandwidth is capped for all devices. Basically Orange was selling HSDPA (3G+) phones for use on their 3G+ network, but would only allow 3G speeds... Busted!

Score: 0

|

On behalf of all the anti-Apple fanboys:...It is still Apple's fault!

Score: 0

|

I'm lost. Anti-anything is just weakness in disguise. You should be Pro-something. It takes more strength to stand for what you believe, than to fight against something you are against.

Your statement is like saying 'Opera 9.51 is more Acid3-Compatible than all other browsers, and it's the Internet's fault'. It's a leading statement that has more false implications in it than truth.

Score: 0

|

That's just wrong. If I were Apple I would take Orange to the EU then sue them. They must have laws against that.

Score: 0

|

Why? I daresay the cap was network-wide, not specific to the iPhone. Customers could sue if they had a Service-Level-Agreement or similar, but I don't think Apple can or would do anything about it.

Score: 0

|

True. In which case, all device-makers should take Orange to the EU, instead of just Apple. This hurts the device makers as much as the customers. To sit idly by make the implication that the device makers *condone* this activity...

Score: 0

|

Mark Russinovich on MinWin, the new core of Windows

The next version of Windows three years hence will likely build onto a significant architectural change implemented in Windows 7 and Server 2008 R2.

Security firm: Windows patches not responsible for 'Black Screen of Death'

On second thought, maybe that access control list thingie with the lockdown something-or-rather didn't trigger an alleged, perhaps non-existent, pandemic.

My Windows 7 confession (and why you should confess, too)

I've held back the real reason for sticking with Windows 7, even as, gulp, iLife calls me to go back to the Mac.

Apple settles with Psystar except for 'circumvention devices'

The fracas with the Florida clone computer maker might have ended today had Apple not have muddled the issue over a cheap piece of Psystar software.

Google begrudgingly adjusts news crawling for paid publishers

If publishers want to make readers pay for news content, and thereby drive down its popularity and Google ranking, the company says, they can just go right on ahead.

Fee or free? Murdoch, Huffington square off over the cost of Internet news

Participants in an FTC workshop yesterday witnessed the two extremes of the Web news publishing debate, still centered on the issue of long-term profitability.

Microsoft denies latest 'Black Screen of Death' claims

After an anti-malware producer announced a fix to what it says is a swarm of recent KSoD problems, evidence of the swarm itself has yet to turn up.

Latest Firefox 3.6 beta fixes 133 bugs, promises faster page load times

A once-sluggish beta testing process has kicked into overdrive, with astonishing success at finding serious bugs. Will Mozilla be able to fix all the others in time?

Confirmed: Office 2010 to ship in June

Two weeks after Microsoft had been expected to draw a clearer roadmap for its principal applications suite, it's finally ready to commit to the end of H1.

New EU antitrust commissioner will oversee Microsoft, Oracle+Sun, Intel issues

As one of Europe's most prominent politicians shifts positions in January, her replacement remains a question mark over technology's biggest issues.

Without its own 'iTablet' yet, is Apple missing the boat?

Steve Jobs is on record as dissing "single-purpose" devices like e-readers. But given their recent popularity, was that a mistake?