Review: Adobe CS3 a Worthy Successor
By Karl Kwasny | Published July 17, 2007, 5:51 PM
Adobe’s Creative Suite has reached its third iteration, and CS3 brings with it quite a few changes - some minor and some remarkable. This review will cover the new editions of both Photoshop and Illustrator, the two programs I use the most frequently.
I (Karl Kwasny) am the lead designer for BetaNews (new site is coming soon!) and primarily an illustrator by trade, so I hope that my somewhat unconventional perspective (that is to say, I am not a photographer) might give a fresh angle to the reviews already out there.
I realize this review comes a few months after Adobe CS3 was released to the public, but I felt I needed the opportunity to test how the new features performed on various real-world projects before being able to give my honest opinion. I do quite a bit of work for fashion companies, editorial work for magazines, posters for events and various other print and screen-based work, so Adobe programs are where I spend a good portion of my life.
For me and every person whose occupation involves illustration or design, each update to Adobe software is a pretty major event. Before I get into the nitty-gritty details, I want to mention that straight away after installing, I was positively surprised by CS3. Contrary to what I was anticipating, it’s quite a drastic leap from CS2; most noticeably the modifications to the way the workspace is presented.
PHOTOSHOP CS3
Photoshop CS3 is offered in both "Standard" and "Extended” editions. For my purposes, the features exclusive to the extended edition are entirely useless. This includes tools for video and film production, scientific applications and 3D support. I’m sure the features themselves are quite useful to those for whom they are intended, but I can’t really make use of them. The Standard edition is probably the best bet for most creative professionals.
There are vast improvements in performance, from what I can tell. The software runs much faster during startup and editing, and the programs feel as though they integrate with each other far better than previous versions did.
It’s now possible to have Photoshop, Illustrator and Indesign open at once and not suffer a massive CPU-hemorrhage. It should be noted at this stage that I use a Dell notebook, so my comments on performance will be relevant only to Windows users. From what I’ve read, there are big performance improvements for Intel-based Macs, too, but I have not experienced them first-hand. Also, Adobe Bridge (which I found to be extremely unstable in CS and CS2) seems to be a lot less prone to crashing now.
Interface Changes
CS3 has brought with it massive changes in the palette management system and the workspace in general (View a Screenshot). Personally, I think they are extremely useful and save a huge amount of screen space, especially if you work on a notebook without access to an additional screen. I previously had a separate monitor set up specifically to be a "palette space" so that I could open all the palettes that I needed and still be able to actually see what I was working on. No longer must I do this! It’s really such an ingenious improvement that I am surprised it wasn’t thought of a while back.
Palettes are now accessed through dock bars. You click on a palette icon and the palette appears. This is far more efficient than having everything open at once. Of course, there is still the option of having palettes permanently open, or having everything open at once if you like it that way, but it’s great to have this feature for laptops. Another space-saving change is the new toolbar, which is now one column wide by default instead of two. Again, it’s possible to change it back to the old two-column version, but it’s probably better this way for most.
There are various other, more subtle interface changes throughout Photoshop CS3 as well, such as the addition of the bridge-launching button and the workspace menu to the option bar, and likely quite a few other little modifications that I haven’t stumbled across yet.
Another visual change I feel is important to mention is that the program identities have been streamlined and simplified. The program icons are now colored squares with table-of-elements style abbreviations to describe which program the icon refers to. At first, when I saw the blue "Ps" icon in the CS3 beta, I thought it was some kind of work-in-progress icon or an elaborate joke, but it's not. In practice, it's actually a lot easier at a glance to identify which program is which in comparison to the old style rainbow Rorschach-test icons, which, annoyingly, changed with each release.
Quick Selection Tool
Another new addition to Photoshop CS3 is the quick selection tool. This tool is essentially a combination of the magic wand tool and a brush. You brush around the area you want to select and the tool guesses where you want the selection to be.
I’ve read reviews praising this new tool, but to me it really doesn’t seem to do a very good job. For high contrast illustration linework, the magic wand tool copes just fine if the image's resolution is high enough, and the extract tool still seems to be the best way to deep etch objects or people out of photos, especially when it comes to tricky areas such as hair.
For photos, the new quick selection tool seems to be a half-way house between the magic wand and extract tools, but it is still quite clumsy and requires the same amount of manual editing afterwards in order to produce a perfect result. In the photo below, I’ve tried to trace around the subjects' contours, but as you can see, the quick selection tool didn’t do a particularly great job.

New Curves Dialog
CS3 brings with it some handy changes to the curves dialog box, an extremely important tool for making tonal corrections. Essentially, it functions the same as in previous versions, but now includes a few new features that make it easier to use.

A histogram is displayed behind the curve which makes it easier to see what you're doing, and black and white sliders (like in the levels dialog) are included below. It's possible now to modify ink percentages instead of brightness, and display a consistent baseline for reference. There is a new presets feature also, so it's possible to save certain curve adjustments and apply them to other images. It's also possible now to modify the algorithm which controls how tones are re-mapped, which makes it possible to do a lot of fine-tuning.
Brightness and Contrast
Up until this point, I (and many others) have avoided the brightness and contrast tool due to the fact that it had a tendency to do a far worse job than curves or levels. That is to say, it didn't preserve the black and white points in the image.
This has been remedied in CS3, and the new brightness and contrast tool will preserve the black point and shadow tones in an image, whilst changing the white point in order to brighten or darken it. This will be extremely useful for those new to Photoshop, because the brightness and contrast tool is logically the first place to look if you want to adjust the brightness and contrast.

Refine Edge
A handy little new feature for fine-tuning the edges of selections is the Refine Edge dialog. It's kind of a compilation of a bunch of useful selection modifications that would have previously been done separately and in a variety of mask modes. Having them grouped together on the same dialog like this is a great idea and will save a lot of time.

Black and White Conversion
Sometimes, doing a straight conversion from color to black and white can leave an image looking a bit flat. Adobe has added a new black and white conversion tool to CS3 that allows you to achieve better result by picking which colours to darken or lighten during the conversion process. (View a Screenshot)
I discovered that this tool is also perfect for completely removing blue construction lines from a pencil illustration – it's also possible to do this with the old hue/saturation dialog or with channels, but neither of those methods works as well as the new black and white conversion tool. You can get rid of the blues contained in the blue pencil and boost the remaining colours to produce a perfect result.

Clone Tool Additions
The clone tool is perhaps one of the most important tools for touching up photos. A new addition to it in CS3 is the ability to adjust which layers are sampled when cloning, and also whether or not to sample adjustment layers.

New Blending Modes
There seem to be two new layer blending modes: "lighter color" and "darker color." As far as I can tell, these modes essentially leave the layer as-is, but makes either the darker or lighter tones transparent depending on which of the two modes is selected. It's always nice to have new blending modes to play with, and I’m sure these ones will come in handy. (View a Screenshot)
Smart Filters
In CS2, Adobe introduced Smart Objects, a new layer format which enabled non-destructive transformations. Now, there are Smart Filters - filters which can be edited at any time and do not destroy the layer they’re applied to. (View a Screenshot)
One benefit of the inclusion of smart filters is the fact that it will remove the need to have a bunch of invisible layers hidden away, needlessly increasing the file size, in case you need to revert to a previous version for whatever reason. It’s possible also to adjust the opacity of a smart filter by clicking on the slider icon to the right.
Summary
Ultimately, Photoshop CS3 is a very worthy successor to CS2 and it's definitely worth the upgrade if you're a heavy user. Each new feature will prove to be useful in one way or another (with the exception of those included in the Extended version, many of which will only be applicable for a small number of people). The Smart Filters are really going to save a lot of time and space in the long run. I personally find the changes to the interface very helpful, and the package as a whole feels far more streamlined and integrated than previous versions.
YOUR REDESIGNING BETANEWS??? Even though I like the current design I have been thinking its time for a change. There hasnt been a new design in years.
Well done!
Score: 0
|I most strongly disagree that this is good news. I've never really got used to this new design and the website was a lot cleaner before its current incarnation. If you must redesign the site take it back to a cleaner predominantly white design site. If it ain't broke - don't fix it. And the old design of the website wasn't broke. Don't update something just for the sake of it. If you need to try and make the website more popular - make the content better. There are certain tweaks that will make the site better but try and get back to the clean white look of the site please. Thanks.
Score: 0
|I just dont understand the obsession with "clean, plain white designs".. IMHO, Betanews as it is right now are ALOT cleaner than some sites out there that get PLENTY of traffic being dirty.
And the adage of "if it ain't broke, dont fix it" needs to die. All designs should be changed every so often to keep from getting stale, no matter the content being delivered.
I particularly like the current design. But, Im partial to thin width websites anyway.
Score: 0
|I've never heard a bigger load of crap in my life. What crap.
Score: 0
|lol
Score: 0
|Go ahead and push for a plain white design without any creativity or thought put into it if you want to. To each our own...
One question though.. What is dirty about the current design?
Score: 0
|Yes lol indeed. You've either got poor English statm1 or you're an idiot.
Score: 0
|So I have to be an idiot or not be fluent in English if I like creativty in a website design as opposed to being lazy and making a quick bland white site.
Makes alot of sense Aires.
Score: 0
|Photoshop is not for home user. So don't compare it with GIMP, Paint.NET or other cheap photo editing software.
You can compare it, but do you really think a professional magazine graphics editor will use Paint.NET? Or an advertising freelance editor? or a wedding album maker?
Maybe some will try other. But Photoshop has become an industry standard that Adobe itself has a hardtime changing the UI of Photoshop without upsetting a lot of users.
Score: 0
|Really? Does that mean that I, as a home user, will have to stop using it?
--->Photoshop is not for home user.
Score: 0
|Don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with CS3 as well as CS2, but MS OneCare Virus checker causes CS2 to take over a minute to open and CS3 takes up to three minutes to shut down.
Neither software supports have a solution, other than turn off virus checking when I run it, or sit out the wait time.
Score: 0
|What i like particularly is how it can utilize unlimited amounts of Ram irrespective of addressing limits the OS itself may have.
Score: 0
|IMO the last good and productive photoshop version was 7.0. CS was buggy, CS2 was extremely bloated. I didn't try CS3 yet but I'm not expecting too much from it...
Score: 0
|I stopped upgrading at 7 as well. It was perfectly fine for non-photo images. With photos, it's only lacking in the red-eye removal part for me. Since you either had to manually do some tricks or use a different application. Maybe I'll try demoing CS3.
Score: 0
|I agree that Photoshop is seriously bloated and CS3 seems to be as well. I had to upgrade from CS2 to CS3 because I wanted the Intel version. There ARE definitely some useful new features in it, particularly smart filters.
Score: 0
|I also agree, I hated CS and CS2 with it's stupid eye candy toolbars was slow as hell. There is a noticable delay when clicking on a tab where PS7 everything works instantly. I was lucky enough to get 7 on a student discount years ago, I'm sure not going to pay a fortune to upgrade to some much slower buggier version for a few niche features.
Score: 0
|Dealing with the Adobe customer service is a Kafkaesque task. CS3 beta would not install on my Vista. After it did, I could not remove it(without adobe's custom cleaner). After that experience, I would not use Adobe products again!
Score: 0
|This is an interesting review, however, for it to be a proper Creative Suite review, you may want to add in additional reviews of programs other than Illustrator and Photoshop.
Score: 0
|OMG! BetaNews doing an actual product review?
Sweet! :P
If only it were still in beta...
Score: 0
|GiMP? for zero dollars?
Score: 0
|Nope, Adobe CS3 for zero dollars. ;)
Score: 0
|I would rather use Photoshop 4.0 than that gimp crap.
Score: 0
|lol. have fun paying for it. I will take my, what, $699, and spend it elsewhere, rather than on that super overpriced Adobe software.
Score: 0
|GiMP is NOT a professional level software. Yes it is free, but is is not mature enough to be used in a pro environment. The biggest con is the lack of CMYK support.
Actually Krita would be a far better open source bitmap editor than GiMP. Krita's still young but grows very very fast.
Score: 0
|GIMP is simply not in the league of Photoshop, neither in functionality nor support. The software itself is only one piece of the puzzle. Go into any decent bookstore and compare the ratio between GIMP books and Photoshop books and or Photoshop related magazines.
(I deliberately made GIMP the numerator so you wouldn't get a divide by zero error in most bookstores (grin) )
Score: 0
|Wrong metric, at least if you're a serious image processing user.
Score: 0
|I already paid for it, got it very cheap. If you were a serious user you'd know that Photoshop is pretty much the standard, and is a very good program. The gimp is free but it's still a poorly designed pile of garbage in comparison. So, lol, have fun with your gimped software. Too bad you can't afford something decent.
Score: 0
|vertical rows are called columns :P
Score: 0
|