Review: Apple's 17-Inch iMac

By Joe Wilcox | Published November 18, 2002, 9:51 PM

Apple has a knack for churning out computers many people wish they could buy. The flat-panel iMac is no exception. The all-in-one computer is an eye-popping spectacle of tasteful but trendy computer design.

But sticker shock sometimes singes the interests of would-be Mac buyers. The entry-level iMac, for example, appears overly priced at $1,199 compared to, say, a Gateway 300S Plus PC for $699 after $100 mail-in rebate.

Both computers come with a 15-inch flat-panel monitor, 128MB of RAM, 40GB hard drive and CD-RW drive. But beyond these surface considerations, the iMac's value compared to the 300S Plus or many other Windows XP PCs is much greater than even its pretty exterior suggests.

As the cliché goes, looks can be deceiving--and in more ways than you might think. So there's no uncertainty about the point: Maybe that $500 savings is less than it seems.

Dazzling display

I reviewed the original flat-panel iMac in March and found the computer to offer exceptional features for anyone working with digital music, videos or photos. Apple had done an excellent job in terms of design, ergonomics and features. The company has extended the iMac's appeal with a larger, widescreen display and a major overhaul to the Mac operating system.

I started my 17-inch iMac testing in late summer as part of a head-to-head comparison with Gateway's Profile 4 PC. Apple sent the $1,999 high-end iMac, which typically comes with a 17-inch widescreen flat-panel display, 800MHz PowerPC G4 processor, 256MB of SDRAM, 32MB nVidia GeForce4 MX graphics accelerator, DVD recording drive, 80GB hard drive, three USB 1.1 ports on system and another two on the keyboard, two 6-pin FireWire ports, 10/100 networking, 56k modem, Apple Pro speakers and Mac OS X 10.2. I asked Apple to bump the memory to 512MB and to add an AirPort 802.11b wireless networking card, which would add about $250 to the system's cost.

The iMac's display is incorporated into the design and moves on a pivoting arm attached to the dome base. Because the arm pivots, the size of the computer changes: Height ranges from 13.03 inches to 20 inches, width from 16.7 inches to 17.7 inches and depth from 10.6 inches to 16.7 inches. The 17-inch model weighs 22.8 pounds, or about one-and-a-half pounds more than the original iMac, which comes with a 15-inch monitor.

The pivoting arm is a marvel of engineering, particularly since it must support the heft and width of that 17-inch monitor. No other computer on the market today lets the user so easily re-position the monitor for easier viewing or sharing information, Web pages or games. My daughter would turn the screen away from me when checking out eBay auctions for Sonic the Hedgehog plush toys she didn't want me to know about. Of course, turning the display away was a signal for snoopy-old dad.

This attention to how a monitor should be used is one of the iMac's standout features. In fact, the LCD panel on the 17-inch--and, for that matter, the original 15-inch--iMac is the best I've seen on any computer. The brightness of the display, crispness of text and richness of color are remarkably superior than what you might get with, say, the 15-inch or 17-inch monitor sold with a Gateway 300 or 500 PC.

Apple ships only digital LCD monitors with its computers, which, because they don't have to go through analog-to-digital conversion, are clearer than the analog monitors sold with the Gateway 300. Apple could probably save a bundle using inferior components, but that also would eliminate one of iMac's key differentiators with flat-panel-equipped PCs. As important, the wide-screen display is a real nice touch for the minority of nuts who like me would rather watch DVD movies on a computer than a TV.

Here's a message Apple might want to give Gateway: The monitor is the gateway to the computer. Hewlett-Packard could learn that lesson too. The new HP Media Center PC, which features Windows XP Media Center Edition, comes with an analog video card. Considering HP and Microsoft position the PC for digital media aficionados and showcase it with a flat-panel display, the analog video card is a bad move, particularly on the $2000 883n model. Ghosting and other visual irregularities are common when using analog on LCD monitors.

Details that matter

This difference in the monitor is an important commentary on how Macs are different from PCs and why many Mac users are so fanatically faithful to Apple: Attention to detail. Apple's attention to good computer design is more than skin deep. Little extras, like spring-loading bolts that affix the iMac's removable-base plate or the addition of 802.11b wireless networking components demonstrate fine attention to important little details. Those bolts are hard to lose, and adding wireless networking to the iMac is easy.

Other fine touches abound, such as the feel of the cables or the computer's overall workmanship. This "feel" of the cables is more than just about touch. The iMac's cables tangle less than those that came with any other Windows PC I have tested; it has to do with the cabling material and how much friction it has with similar surfaces.

Like earlier iMacs, the new model is fairly quiet. The keyboard has great touch and feel and is very responsive; the same goes for the infrared mouse. But I will fault Apple for not providing a two-button mouse, which would be a big productivity booster. Mac OS X 10.2 supports right-click context menus, but one-button mouse users must use a keyboard combination to summon the menus. Are you listening to this criticism, Apple?

The new iMac delivers great sound through the small globe-shaped speakers--and thumping bass, too, with Harmon Kardon's iSub subwoofer attached. With the August release of Mac OS X 10.2, Apple added a separate software volume control for iSub, which resolved hissing and popping problems. Certainly, these are not big, surround-sound speakers at 9-watts each boosted by an 18-watt digital amplifier. But matched with iSub, the speakers deliver surprisingly rich sound, particularly when watching DVDs. (Hey, if you want surround-sound, move to the living room and your big-screen TV.)

The attention to detail seeps into the operating system, too, and Apple's six digital lifestyle applications: iMovie 2 for video editing; iTunes 3 for music ripping, burning and listening; iPhoto, for managing, sharing or printing digital images; for desktop and online calendaring; and iSync, synchronization software for the iPod music player, Palm handhelds on Bluetooth-enabled cell phones such as the Sony Ericsson T68i.

There are good reasons why Apple positions iMac as a "hub" for connecting digital devices, such as cameras, camcorders or music players. The six applications and operating system improvements introduced with Mac OS X 10.2 make working with these devices much easier than on the PC. Most PC manufacturers include with their computers a skimpy selection of digital media applications. The exception is Sony.

Sony has gone a long way to developing a robust set of digital applications that rival Apple's. For example, the Japanese computer maker recently added new "Click to DVD" software that quickly and easily burns movies to DVDs. The software offers comparable features to Apple's iDVD 2 and is about as easy to use. But thanks in part to how well iDVD 2 works on Mac OS X 10.2, I would give the edge to Apple--for now.

Losing this edge in digital applications, in fact, could be a big problem for Apple. Sonic Solution's MyDVD 4 also offers ease and features comparable to iDVD 2--including use of full-motion menus for producing slick Hollywood-style DVDs. But most PC makers don't include the better third-party digital media applications with new computers. For now, only Sony offers a range of digital applications that compete with Apple's.

But Microsoft operating system advances arm some PC makers with intriguing digital weapons to take on Apple. In fact, so confident is Microsoft with its growing digital applications arsenal, the company launched on Nov. 14, 2002, a new Web site touting Windows XP's digital media features. Microsoft is pushing for areas: Music, movies, photos and communications. Windows Media Player 9 Series (Can you believe that name?) offers up some tremendous advances in digital music--as long as you use Microsoft's audio format--such as 5.1 surround sound. Microsoft issued the first release candidate, or near-final testing version, on Nov. 1. The same day, the company release the first beta of Movie Maker 2, Microsoft's response to Apple's iMovie 2. Apple can claim the lead over Microsoft making movies--for now.

Evaluating value

Now, all this said in favor of the 17-inch iMac, which I really, really liked, most PCs pack more raw power than Apple's trendy all-in-one. (Mac users that like to talk about the megahertz myth and how PCs really aren't faster may be beyond listening to reason.) This power difference is particularly true of the new crop of PCs--3GHz Pentium 4 models that debuted on Nov. 14, 2002. These computers pack big power that could overwhelm some potential iMac buyers, but so will the price. Most of these systems will sell for much more than any model in Apple's flat-panel iMac crop.

Still, even the current crop of PCs pack power the iMac may find tough to match--or so it would seem at first glance. Case in point: HP's Pavilion 763n comes with a 2.53GHz Pentium 4 processor, 512MB of RAM, 64MB GeForce4 MX 420 graphics accelerator, DVD recording drive, 80GB hard drive, 56k modem, 10/100 networking, USB 2.0 and Windows XP Home for $1,249 from PC Connection. A 17-inch flat-panel monitor would cost about another $500, bringing the price to $1,749 or about $250 less than the high-end iMac. Advantages to HP: Faster clock-speed processor, more memory, better graphics card and availability of USB 2. Advantages to Apple: Digital display, wide-screen monitor, 802.11b wireless readiness, smaller size, attractive ergonomic design and bundled digital applications.

Consistently in my testing, many PCs appeared faster than iMac. But the iMac was more trouble free, in terms of everyday glitches using the applications and operating system or hassles connecting devices and peripherals to the computer. The iMac also proved plenty fast for what it needed to do, at least for most consumer tasks. But I did note some troubling performance problems that the majority of users might never see. Apple could fix this by using the same 800MHz processor found in the PowerBook G4.

Buyers pining for raw power may want to pass on iMac--the same way someone shopping for a minivan might not consider a Volkswagen Beetle or sports car. Carrying the analogy further, a minivan might have all kinds of extras, like collapsible seats, TV for the kiddies or five doors. But those features might not appeal to the sports car or beetle buyer. You could apply the same rule to PCs vs. Macs. PC evangelists like to tout feature differences and the megahertz--OK, gigahertz--gap between Windows computers and Macs.

But like any other purchase, what you as the buyer want is most important. The aforementioned Gateway 300S Plus would appear to be a better deal than the iMac--after all, Apple's comparable computer does cost $500 more. If you need a basic PC cheap, OK, getaway with the Gateway. But people shopping for a quality computer they will be happy with for a long time, might find iMac to be the better choice.

Taking an analogy from autos, a faster or more powerful engine does not necessarily mean better handling for everyday driving. The iMac is fun to use and hugs the road nicely. Those interested in digital applications or looking to get a consistently good experience from their computer might want to consider the iMac. Here, the unseen might matter more than iMac's trendy styling and ergonomics.

The iMac would likely outlast the Gateway 300 and many other lower-cost PCs, too, for long-term use. I own a nearly two-and-a-half-year-old Apple Cube that runs Mac OS X 10.2 just fine. During that two and half years, Apple and Microsoft released major OS overhauls. The same vintage PC would be better off on the junk pile than running Windows XP. Again, Apple's attention to detail--in this case customer satisfaction--is important. The Windows PC business model is built on forced-obsolesce, where faster processors and more processor-intensive software help foster a continuing cycle of upgrades. Apple has found a better balance, trying to win over new users through compelling applications rather than push faster processors.

So, in some ways, evaluating the value of a Mac vs. PC is more than about price--or appearances. I give the iMac an A-.

Joe Wilcox has been covering technology since 1994 and now spends his days writing about Microsoft for CNET News.com. Joe can be found online at joewilcox.com.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

im mainly a pc user.
i have two pcs in my room; one running win xp, the other - linux.

my sister has two iMacs, the older one and the top end new flat screen model. we also have an ibook and a titanium, and a pc laptop which is about two years old now.

now then, macs are great, they sit tight and look pretty. i enjoying messing around with my sister's iMacs, but when it comes down to work; photoshop, video editing, etc - i work with my pc. a lot of the positive points noted were about the aesthetics of the machine. i'm just surprised the focus wasn't on the performance.

i dont care about aesthetics when i'm working. i know how to work my computer, buy and assembled the various parts - something i like about the pc. (the choices available).

lets say the costs dont matter too much, and essentially you're going after pure performace. the only macs you would really consider would be the dual gig tower g4s. those machines lack the finer points outlined - pivotal flatscreen, etc. even then, i doubt they would outperform a top end pc.

which is something which you could easily fix i suppose by getting one of apples beautifully large flatscreens. i'm told by my uni lecturers, however, if you're working in design related fields - CRT monitors still provide the best resolutions.

you're right, it depends more on the user than anything.
and i would ONLY recommend macs to casual users.

Score: 0

|

don't bother anymore comparing apples to oranges...people will always like what they use and know the most...they don't want to feel that there is a better world beyond them...so they will always feel that they are using is best...apples are probably the best computer you will never use...unless they market themselves better and cheaper forget it...M$ will win by default...i have seen apple networks that ran on near automatic pilot...never had a single problem...try that with any windows version...apples are better but remember betamax...superiority is not enough

Score: 0

|

Ok, before I get flammed bad, please read the entire post.

I go to Rochester Insitute of Technology, one of the best schools in the US for digital imaging and printing. Almost all the labs are macs and I have extensively used macs and pcs for a very long time. I must say that in these times I honestly believe that PCs are better for imaging, an area where a mac used to be superior.

First of all macs used to use superior hardware, not really the case anymore, everything but the processor is the same.

Test wise i was building some Flash and shockwave movies and has some vector images moving to music, no big deal. I built it on my laptop ( 1.7 P4-M 512mb ram geforce 4go 64mb, 5400 rpm hd) and brought it to the mac which was a 1ghz G4 1gig ram geforce 4 ti, setting reset, on every machine the movie would lag incredibly behind when this one scene set in with several vector images moving.

Same for photo editing in photoshop 7, i can honestly say things go faster on my laptop. Now OK, the 1ghz isnt the fastest? Right. The 1.7 p4 isnt a 3ghz either.

Why does our school buy them then, they get very good deals. Maybe why the 3d rendering labs have high end dell workstations (which probably cost the same as macs).

This is just my 2 cents from EVERY day work on these machines.

Score: 0

|

Actually, the 3D Labs down the hall use SGI workstations. ;)

Score: 0

|

hehe, true

Building 7B, first lab on the left, all dell high end workstation for 3d modeling.

Score: 0

|

Ive used windows for ever and thought that it was so much better than apple, intill i actually bought a mac, now i feel stupid because apples really are so much better. I could say tons about how and why they are better but you can take my opinion in you will never go back once you switch to Mac.

Score: 0

|

What you say is not true about switching to MAC. I bought a IMAC, used it sporadically, now I never even turn it on. It sure is pretty though, just sitting there.

Score: 0

|

Do you actually think that I made that comment without a shred of knowledge? I have used both units equally. If I want ART, I will buy a Michael Angelo. Apples were, are, and always will be the computer designed for the user that just "doesn't quite get" how to operate a computer.

Score: 0

|

sell it to me...

Score: 0

|

Windows do look very plain and boring you know.
You can customize the cases very much, but not too much.
Although I'm a windows user, I think it'd be cool (cool if I was rich) to have a mac sitting there like a piece of art.

Score: 0

|

How come I can't come to this website without seeing how great some new mac is? Don't get me wrong, I don't have anything against macs, but I'm almost positive that 99.9% of the readers who visit this site aren't using macs, and aren't really all that interested. I started using this site years ago, of course things have changed since then, but it was always about beta software, mostly windows beta, maybe a little linux or beos or something else interesting along the way, but it seems like there is a new mac article every week. Is it just because the guy who runs the site bought him a mac and now wants to convert us all? Oh well.

Score: 0

|

Well, I for one am both a PC and Mac user and I find it very convenient that I can get good software, news, and occasional Apple stuff in one place. Who cares if there's something about macs every once and awhile. I for one would be excited if they started keeping track of apple software too. In the meantime, if you don't like the Apple news/reviews...simply use your brain and don't click on the link...gesh

Score: 0

|

when you use Windows all day...you need to filter out all other possibilities...M$ wants people like that...the one that complain about Macs, Linux...without even knowing what they are talking about...anybody that has used the iTools...regardless of their personal bias...has to be impressed...and tell me any M$ machine that can have as good monitor as those Macs...hint it's the OS, stupid not the monitor...

Score: 0

|

Advantages to Apple: Digital display, wide-screen monitor, 802.11b wireless readiness, smaller size, attractive ergonomic design and bundled digital applications.

Advantages to Apple: weak.

Score: 0

|

This isn't really about "which is better"... It's just about the direction of this site. Honestly if I want to get hardware reviews, I go to a few dozen other places, whether it be Mac, PC, PDA, etc... I don't really need to get it here. If the people running the site decided to start listing as many mac (beta?) software as they can find, I wouldn't really even care or think twice about it... But how does the new hardware articles fit in every few days?

Score: 0

|

Without hardware, you have no software to beta test.

Score: 0

|

PDC 2009: What have we learned this week?

There was the freebie that no one will forget, the heebie-jeebies courtesy of Scott Guthrie, and a teensy bit clearer picture of how this cloud thingie should work.

Live report: Will Google Chrome OS change Linux?

The mysteries of just what Chrome OS is, and how much of an operating system it truly is, may be resolved today.

PDC 2009: Microsoft cares about Web browser performance

The effort to give users of the world's dominant Web browser the impression of quality, is a personal one for the man who leads that battle.

Nokia re-affirms its commitment to Symbian, sort of

Maemo won't necessarily be replacing Symbian in the Nokia N-Series, but that's definitely a place where it will be found.

E-book readers will be in short supply this holiday season

E-readers are hot this year, and a lot of compelling new products have been released, but are there enough electrophoretic displays to go around?

Sony looks to finally open a single storefront for downloads

Sony has had many different download portals for movies, music, e-books, and games, and now it's looking to make a single shop for all of it.

Tuning out the tablet: Time to give the endless speculation a rest

Wide Angle Zoom: Wishing and hoping and thinking and praying....won't put an iTablet on the market.

Five improvements for IT managers in 2010

If businesses are to improve their efficiency for next year, they need to stop and reassess the basic tenets of their job.

AOL's spinoff from Time Warner to shed 2,500 jobs

As AOL moves toward become an independent company again, it will cut nearly a third of its workforce.

Gartner: SMS-based money transfer will be bigger than mobile browsing, search

Gartner issues its predictions for the 10 things our phones will be doing in 2012.

Don't forget to upgrade to Firefox 3.6 beta 3 today

Mozilla has released the latest beta its Firefox 3.6 browser software, just over one week after beta 2.