Login:
Password:

Security Flaw Exposes 35 Million AOL Accounts

By Nate Mook and Craig Newell, BetaNews

January 22, 2003, 11:19 AM

UPDATED The accounts of millions of AOL subscribers were jeopardized this week due to a serious flaw in the company's Web-based mail system, BetaNews has learned.

The vulnerability stems from an error in one of AOL's international e-mail authentication systems, which granted users access without correctly verifying passwords. By simply entering an account name, an AOL user had the ability to read any other user's e-mail and all personal data contained therein.

Private correspondence suddenly became open for public perusal, and sensitive information such as passwords and account numbers were potentially exposed to prying eyes.

Although AOL plugged the security hole early Wednesday morning, it is unclear at this point how many AOL and AIM accounts have been compromised. A source who demonstrated the vulnerability to BetaNews indicated that scores of accounts had been infiltrated in just a short time.

The only accounts entirely spared from the snafu were those of AOL employees, as a SecurID code is required for such accounts, in addition to a password.

While security issues are nothing new to AOL, the scope of this vulnerability and the ease with which it was executed are particularly disconcerting. Such a security breach extends beyond just e-mail and opens the door for potential identity theft.

"There's two basic models of system security: Perimeter and Defense-In-Depth. Though no good system ever survives a weak perimeter, it's all too easy to suffer 'Candy Bar Security': Crunchy on the outside, soft and chewy on the inside," said Dan Kaminsky, security engineer for DoxPara Research. "Unfortunately, that's what hit AOL in this case. For whatever reason, AOL's mail servers were willing to grant access to user archives because they believed some trusted host at the perimeter had authenticated the necessary token -- the password."

The biggest risk lies in the connection between AOL and AIM. Because the messaging networks utilize separate databases, when an AOL account is created, an independently controlled AOL Instant Messenger account is also established with the same e-mail and password.

Anyone with access to a member's e-mail can easily request a reminder of their AOL Instant Messenger password, which in most cases would also grant complete control over the AOL account. This would allow even more personal information to be accessed including addresses and phone numbers.

According to reports, AIM accounts could also be hijacked by changing the password and e-mail address associated with the username.

The vulnerability does not directly affect ScreenName, the unified sign-on system deployed across AOL's Web properties. However, once a password is obtained, personal information stored on any ScreenName-enabled site is potentially at risk.

Major online players such as Microsoft with its Passport service, and the Liberty Alliance backed by AOL and Sun have been advocates of single sign-in technologies where a user only needs to log in once to access numerous services.

But with such a large repository of user data, security concerns become paramount. AOL has faced several major security breaches in the past, most notably in summer of 2000 when hackers were able to access the subscriber's information database that includes detailed customer records like credit card information.

AOL has confirmed the problem to third parties but has not responded to several requests for comment by BetaNews.

Add a Comment (28 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By zhanghenihao

posted Nov 12, 2008 - 4:10 AM

zhanghe is good boy
http://www.wow-powerleveling-wow.com/ wow gold
http://www.powerleveling-wowgold.com/ wow gold

Score: 0

By skotos

posted Jan 26, 2003 - 11:43 PM

AOL is still the best mail order coaster service around

my "beverage ring stain free" coffee table thanx you AOL keep up the good work

Score: 0

By Sephirstein

posted Jan 26, 2003 - 2:36 AM

They're involved with a group called the Liberty Alliance. Knowing how evil AO-Hell, it's probably named in homage to Jerry "The Fascist" Falwell's Liberty Alliance.

Score: 0

By Der_Diktator

posted Jan 24, 2003 - 7:11 PM

Ah, yes, AOL... They are just so, um, reliable? Evil? IRRESPONSIBLE?! Yes, I do go for the second and third ones. So, a word for the wise to anyone who wasn't at all concerned about the article: AOL sucks.

Score: 0

By tp1423

posted Jan 24, 2003 - 2:44 PM

So If they fixxed there little snaffoo @aol.crap how come I can't get back into my email and retrieve what's left of it. Does anyone know how I may be able to do this. Post it here since I can't get mt aol mail. Mean while I am going to search for a email address some where like msn....lol...

Score: 0

By martinh

posted Jan 28, 2003 - 3:53 PM

Sign up to a low call isp temporarily, go to the AOL homepage, enter in your AOL username and password and whoalllaa!! instant e-mail access...trust me I've tried it, and I sympathise I've given up on them but thats what I did, hope it helps :)

Score: 0

By zechs81

posted Jan 24, 2003 - 2:33 PM

Well, From what I have seen from the article and post I am saddened by this a bit. Given the only flaw there at this time is the cookie that is in the system that remembers the name and password on the computer when you login. dose this give full access to account info or give you the ability to hack the system the answer is no. For those who claim that it is easy to hack well if you say so. Cause with those who know enough can put a mail box password which you would have to enter for extra security. Cause no account info would be transmitted through the mail that would cover passwords or billing information. So given access to the mail box itself you would not be able to view vital information other than mail and personally anyone who would send there information through the mail is stupid. And calm down about the messaging thing by the time icq itself had begun to grow and people where beginning to use it more in the US AOL had already begun to control it and eventually bought it out. With views on the topic of accounts being exposed it really isn't the only thing that is the mail is. For all the messaging on the net if someone that pays for the service wants the name that someone who gets it for FREE well they can have it they pay for it they deserve it. If there is a problem it gets fixed AOL isn't like some services that have been hacked and had there main pages changed and been shut for hours if not days.

Score: 0

By NULLedge

posted Jan 27, 2003 - 11:57 AM

so basically you're saying that because i can request the system to email me your password in plain text and then i can go check your mail to see your password that i cant use your screen name and password to log into your account and change your personal settings?

amazing logic. do you work _for_ AOL?

Score: 0

By maans

posted Jan 23, 2003 - 1:58 AM

Thats what they get for using aol, the company responsible for such things as the destruction of winamp and the spanking of netscape, the sadistic disturbing murder of icq (damn you mirabalis for selling!!!!, the crap software aim...and the introduction of the internet to people who's sister is also their mother and uncle. Oh yea and that freaking "Youve got mail!!!" sound. It pains me that mozilla recieves financial support from AOL, since any affiliation with them eventually means destruction (ie. declining profits of time warner) maybe thats why apple chose not to go with a mozilla based app as its bundled browser. AOL will destroy everything if it is not stopped...and the security sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I miss ICQ :(

Score: 0

By Maniacal

posted Jan 28, 2003 - 10:42 PM

LOL i agree i miss ICQ also i did find a better product than AOL IM thou goto www.IMICI.com and get the free version it allows you to log onto AOL ICQ MSN etc . . . all at once and allows file transfer itis preety good software.

Score: 0

By NULLedge

posted Jan 27, 2003 - 12:05 PM

"and the introduction of the internet to people who's sister is also their mother and uncle"

is her name Wanda?

Winamp's still free. ICQ is still free. Winamp plays videos now and if they can get it to play back at least equivilent to WMP without sketching out on the frames or changing the colors of the wmv files to some other hue then it will rock. Last time i checked you could still use older ICQ clients with the current system although i couldnt even begin to tell you when the last bloat free version of ICQ was released. At least ICQ lite is "decent" and by decent i mean barely usable.

Score: 0

By threedaysdwn

posted Feb 6, 2003 - 4:23 PM

Winamp 3 is the biggest hunk of crap in the media player market. The only thing it looks decent against is Real. And that's because Real has set the bar so low with their products that no one dare suck that much.

WMP9 > MusicMatch > WinAmp 3 > Real

For simple media players WinAmp 2 was great. But Jukebox-type programs have taken over... and you can hate MS and bash them all you want... but in this market WMP9 stands alone.

Score: 0

By StingK

posted Feb 7, 2003 - 6:07 AM

You mean:

WinAmp 2.81 > WMP9 > MusicMatch > WinAmp 3 > Real

WinAmp 2.8 is still in production. And if it's possible ,will keep getting better.

Score: 0

By SeanR561

posted Jan 26, 2003 - 1:35 AM

in all honesty... i like Konqueror better as a browser than mozilla. Mozilla has strange fonts and behaves very awkward on certain pages. This is on the linux/bsd platform. On the Windows platform I think Mozilla kicks ass.

Score: 0

By threedaysdwn

posted Feb 6, 2003 - 4:25 PM

Konqueror is nice. But Mozilla is crap even on Windows.

IE remains the best.

Konqueror is an IE clone for *nix

Score: 0

By franzj

posted Jan 24, 2003 - 12:24 AM

Mozilla IS NOT owned or operated by AOL, even if Netscape is.

Score: 0

By scratch311

posted Jan 24, 2003 - 5:36 PM

he didn't say that AOL owns Mozilla, he said AOL gives financial support to Mozilla. And AOL does indeed give financial support to Mozilla.

Score: 0

By franzj

posted Jan 26, 2003 - 2:01 AM

my bad, my bad.

Score: 0

By donpacman

posted Jan 23, 2003 - 1:24 AM

All Over Losers

Score: 0

By andrey

posted Jan 22, 2003 - 7:07 PM

Are there any official links on this? I can't seem to find any information about this nowhever on the Web.

Score: 0

By jkeagle13

posted Jan 22, 2003 - 10:50 PM

I had trouble finding it also. Try: http://news.com.com/2100-1001-981730.html

Score: 0

By ThaCHEESE

posted Jan 22, 2003 - 2:57 PM

it's so easy to use... No wonder it's #1.

Score: 0

By NULLedge

posted Jan 27, 2003 - 12:06 PM

and the surgery to install it to the base of your skull is soo painless....

Score: 0

By lilmegz

posted Jan 22, 2003 - 8:44 PM

Yup, so easy to hack it too :)

Score: 0

By BornBlurr

posted Jan 22, 2003 - 9:46 PM

Indeed!

Amen.

Score: 0

By Djarum

posted Jan 27, 2003 - 5:38 PM

How about calling it like it is. Hack? Give me a break. Not one person hacked anything throughout this entire situation. This security issue was spread in AIM chat rooms by kids telling each other "dude jap netmail doesn't require a password, you can get onto any name". The result of this was hundreds of kids logging in to dozens of names each. No it didn't last long, but yes Thousands of names were compromised. So let's review, all you had to do was type in a screen name and enter. I don't see any skill here. Let's get it straight, AOL botched their security themselves. No one broke into the site and removed required authentications. The kids on the "aol" scene Did not, Can not, and Will not hack a damn thing.

Score: 0

By Maniacal

posted Jan 28, 2003 - 10:53 PM

True this was not a hack, but come on you can not actualyl defend AOL. I mean that little screw up would get any IT ADMIN FIRED in the real world. I think itis truly sad that a multi-million $ company can't keep there email secure. HELL that is there number one bragging point inn advertising. It should say "You got mail, and it has already been read by someone."

Score: 0

By Maniacal

posted Jan 28, 2003 - 10:49 PM

True this was not a hack, but come on you can not actualyl defend AOL. I mean that little screw up would get any IT ADMIN FIRED in the real world. I think itis truly sad that a multi-million $ company can't keep there email secure. HELL that is there number one bragging point inn advertising. It should say "You got mail, and it has already been read by someone."

Score: 0