Senate votes to consider FISA bill with telco immunity

By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published December 17, 2007, 3:25 PM

A procedural hurdle that would have stopped debate on a controversial amendment to the FISA law failed in the US Senate early this afternoon.

By a vote of 76-10, the US Senate has voted to consider an amendment to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that contains a controversial provision granting telecommunications companies immunity from federal prosecution for having cooperated with the government in surveillance operations.

The procedural vote means that the provision, not only supported but mandated by President Bush as a requirement before it's signed into law, will be debated on the Senate floor. Amendments will likely be offered to the bill that strike the provision, including one from presidential candidate Sen. Chris Dodd (D - Conn.) and Sen. Russ Feingold (D - Wisc.).

And even if those amendments fail, the Senate version of the bill will have to be reconciled with a House version which omits immunity for telcos.

In a statement this afternoon, Sen. Feingold took his own party's leadership to task, condemning Majority Leader Harry Reid (D - Nev.) for having chosen the Intelligence Committee's version of the FISA legislation over the Judiciary Committee's version, backed by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D - Vt.), a staunch opponent of telco immunity.

"By choosing the Intelligence Committee bill over the Judiciary product," Feingold wrote this morning just prior to the noon vote on Capitol Hill, "Senator Reid has made things much tougher for those of us who think the courts -- not Congress -- should decide whether the companies deserve immunity. He's also made it an uphill struggle of those of us who want more court oversight of the broad new surveillance powers included in the bill."

For his own part, Sen. Leahy issued his own laments.

"This Administration violated FISA by conducting warrantless surveillance for more than five years," Leahy wrote this morning. "They got caught, and if they hadn't, they would probably still be doing it. When the public found out about the President's illegal surveillance of Americans, the Administration and the telephone companies were sued by citizens who believe their privacy and their rights were violated. Now the Administration is trying to get this Congress to terminate those lawsuits in order to insulate itself from accountability. We should not allow this to happen."

Sen. Reid's office has yet to issue a statement on the matter at mid-afternoon Monday, nor has the office of Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D - W.V.), who leads the Intelligence Committee that supports the immunity provision.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

Being the President of the United States is like being God. You're not only immune from any prosecution or wrong doing, no matter what you do, you also have the power to forcefully cleanse others you dragged into the mud along with yourself. Gotta love it. They can debate this bill all they want, it will never pass unless the provisions of granting immunity are left intact. Bush already said he will vito any version without it. He has to. The telcos did his dirty work and he owes them for it.

Score: 0

|

Thats not true .!

Score: 0

|

I've heard that presidents are actually pretty powerless on paper.
Maybe the events in today's outer republic (USA/The World) is a reflection of our inner republic (our inner selves[apathy, doubt, fear, escape, etc.])

Score: 0

|

I say, let's give each other space to breath and live our lives.

Houston Police Chief Wants Surveillance Cameras In Private Homes
http://www.infowars.com/...wants_cams_in_homes.htm

FBI records audio from cell phone when it is turned off
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jb6UCKTXL9Y

Freedom road brother! There is no rest. Freedom is just the nature of our being. There is no end I say ;)

Score: 0

|

first link broken... if memory serves me right: was that to film caregivers & babysitters?

Score: 0

|

Thanks for the reply. Here's the fixed link.

Houston Police Chief Wants Surveillance Cameras In Private Homes
http://www.prisonplanet..../160206privatehomes.htm

I recall the babysitters one but this video focuses on all cell phones.

Score: 0

|

A real beta process at work: Mozilla fires up Firefox 3.6 Beta 2

In the clearest sign yet that public input really does help the development process, a flurry of bug detections provoked Mozilla to release Beta 2 of the next Firefox.

Snow Leopard and Windows 7 still can't crack the netbook problem

Apple has killed Atom support in OS X 10.6.2 and Windows 7 Starter Edition is stripped of "basic" functionality.

Microsoft's Top 3 advances in Exchange Server 2010

The latest round of changes launched today will impact how admins deliver services to e-mail recipients, and how much companies will pay along the way.

Firefox turns five: Thanks for giving us a choice

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: No longer the phoenix rising from the ashes, Mozilla has carried on more than just Netscape's legacy.

Kindle for PC opens in beta, underwhelms

Amazon has opened the beta of Kindle for PC, a companion to the Kindle, but little else.

European ministers approve watered-down 'neutral net' language

The latest provision in the EU's telecoms regulatory framework would let businesses cancel individuals' Internet access, if they go to court first.

It's the US vs. the EU over Oracle+Sun and the meaning of 'open source'

Now that the EU is a virtual country, the US Justice Dept. is taking a stand in favor of its view -- and against the EC's -- that MySQL will survive under Oracle.

Qualcomm: $1.3 billion Samsung licensing deal unrelated to fair trade violations

Samsung has come to a 15-year licensing deal with Qualcomm over 3G and 4G wireless technology.

Nokia's 'limited number' of recalled chargers exceeds 14 million

Today, the Finnish phone maker has begun a recall of mobile phone chargers that are a shock hazard.

Ubuntu 9.10 upgraders report frustration

For those Wine aficionados out there, beware of the remote possibility that your Linux system could be infected by Windows-seeking malware.

Supreme Court considers patentability of abstract methods today

Can software that executes a formula for a business process qualify for federal patents? An appeals court already said no, and inventors are making their case.