Senate votes to delay DTV transition, House may be next
By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published January 26, 2009, 9:49 PM
A bipartisan compromise bill drawn up over the weekend by Sens. Jay Rockefeller (D - W.V.) and Kay Bailey Hutchison (R - Tex.), which would delay the US' transfer date for over-the-air TV broadcasts to digital to June 12, passed the Senate early Monday evening. A bill with similar language being debated in the House, could pass there as early as tomorrow.
The ink on the bill is so fresh that the Library of Congress' online reporting service does not yet have the text. So it is believed that the matter of how Congress would appropriate the money necessary to extend the deadline, was actually left up in the air. Prior to the other important transition that happened in Washington -- the change of administrations -- government accountants reported the coupon program was running dry of funds.
In an effort to reconcile some of the unwritten elements of the compromise bill prior to just simply delaying everything, PBS President and CEO Paula Kerger -- whose member stations will probably be forced to broadcast on both analog and digital frequencies throughout the spring -- told Congress that her network would need $22 million in government funds.
Earlier this month, Kerger expressed dismay that citizens who have recently requested coupons were apparently being put on waiting lists, while the distribution problem was sorted out.
The purpose for the delay is to iron out the problems the government has apparently had in distributing coupons redeemable toward the purchase of DTV converter boxes for existing analog sets. The Nielsen organization estimates that about 5% of the population, as of a few weeks ago, may not be ready for the transition.
In a statement this evening to the Associated Press, Sen. Rockefeller said, "Delaying the upcoming DTV switch is the right thing to do. I firmly believe that our nation is not yet ready to make this transition at this time. The Senate acted responsibly to give the Obama Administration time to attempt to bring order to a mismanaged process."
I bet it would be cheaper for the local stations to buy converter boxes for people who still don't have them then it would be to keep broadcasting analog for another 4 months. Plus I saw an add on our NBC affiliate here in Las Vegas that said on the 7th they were turning down the power on the analog station.
Score: 0
|...and the soap-opera continues...
Score: 0
|People have had years to prepare for this. If they aren't ready by now another few months is not going to make any difference. They could delay it until 2020 and people still would not be ready. Why? Because people procrastinate. Do the switch now though and I guarantee the people who lose their signal will get their fat rear ends off the couch and get a box that very day.
After the endless dire warnings about February 12 this is just going to confuse people. They've been going on about it like the world is coming to an end on that day; now they are wanting to delay it for another four months? "February 12 is the deadline! Psyche! Just kidding, it's June now." Perhaps they should read the story of the boy who cried wolf. In any case I am SICK of hearing about it. Please don't tell me we have to put up with this crap until June.
Score: 2
|This couldn't have been said any better. The government shouldn't delay DTV because of people being too lazy to even care.
Score: 0
|and that 5% will not be ready in june either this is a waste of money, its going to cost the gov ore to delay it dont they see this?
Score: 0
|and that 5% will not be ready in june either this is a waste of money, its going to cost the gov ore to delay it dont they see this?
>
Ah, the whining morons who ran out and spent loads of $$$ on crappy digital tech are b****ing about the fact the fed's have realized that it's not wise to railroad this crap down the throat of a country that's clearly not ready for it.
Pity that.
Score: 0
|