The Buzz: RIM's BlackBerry Saved

By the Betanews Staff | Published March 6, 2006, 11:58 AM

The weekend was abuzz with pundits and bloggers alike wrapping their heads around RIM's $612.5 million settlement with NTP late Friday. Some say RIM caved to the patent holding company, while others feel NTP won in court fair and square -- despite its patents now being rejected by the USPTO. Where do you stand?

"Our wireless enterprise customers are breathing a sigh of relief with this settlement. Many of these companies have invested a fortune in Blackberries to equip their field sales force and now they know their investment is secure. However, the settlement still leaves an open question as to whether patent attorneys are going to control the destiny of emerging technologies." - Rich Koch, Apresta Marketing VP

"This has been an example of what not to do in an intellectual property dispute. RIM probably cost itself several times what it actually paid out in lost business because of the way they handled this and, had they settled early on, probably could have settled for a fraction of what they paid The mistakes were not understanding the risks up front, falsifying evidence in court, not protecting their customers from harm, and not realizing that things were spiraling out of control." - Rob Enderle, The Enderle Group

"It's not a shocker since NTP is not RIM's competition. There's no money for them to be made forcing RIM out of business. It was an interesting legal battle but it was never likely RIM would be shut down. Overall, good news for RIM, good news for NTP, really bad news for folks like Visto that has been trying to convince the market that they're a viable solution for Blackberry customers." - Michael Gartenberg, Jupiter Research

"The overall deal may have made business sense in the end for RIM (whose stock is way up, and whose sales will likely improve without the uncertainty over its head), but it's highlighted in very real terms what a travesty the patent system has become these days. The company that does nothing gets rich and the company that innovated is slowed down." - Techdirt

"We have long believed that a settlement between these parties would be the eventual outcome...Palm's partnerships with Good Technology and Microsoft are attracting a growing number of customers. In the United States, we are gaining share of the smartphone market faster than any other supplier, including RIM. We think our momentum will continue as more and more companies understand and deploy our solutions." - statement from Palm, Inc.

"The patent case was a whole bunch of noise. Right now, RIM is in danger of relegating itself to becoming a niche e-mail player." - Ellen Dailey, Forrester Research

"Ironically, the patent review won't stop just because RIM finally agreed to settle the case. That leaves open the possibility that RIM has paid NTP more than $600 million for infringing patents that the small Virginia firm may one day no longer claim." - John Shinal, MarketWatch

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

I'm firmly in the "I don't really care" section.

Score: 0

|

I think RIM did this to save the service; but will drag their feet on payment. Once the USPTO rejects everyting (and I really think they will), RIM will likely reneg on the settlement, and go back to court to get it reversed.

Score: 0

|

sorry, that won't happen. They are signing legal documents from the courts that the case is settled. The USPTO might even drop whatever they are doing. Why spend money and resources on an issue that is not valid, and besides, they(RIM NTP) might have signed other documents relating to these issues. They would be idiotic not to do so. The lawyers would have somthing to say about that.

Score: 0

|

You know what they say....

If you can't Innovate...Litigate!

This is a patent for general conceptual level technolgy that they have squeezed for all it is worth. I applaud original thinking but not when you just have great ideas, patent them, then wait for someone else to put in the work on developing, marketing, and selling it so you can suck them dry for some $$$. I know this is a simplistic view, but I don't like how the lawyers always end up getting paid more than anyone else, and contributing little to the actual tech.

Score: 0

|

This is just as bad as those people that sue someone for crazy amounts of money, just because they can.

NTP is just a bunch of greedy bas****s. They were given a very nice offer of 450million way back and they should have just taken that and ended this.

Score: 0

|

They did accept it. The settlement was rejected by the courts...

Score: 0

|

How does a settlement get rejected by the courts?? Settlements are settled "out of court"...if I sue you for $100 and you offer me $10 and I accept...the court can't say "no you owe him $100"...LOL.

NTP rejected the initial offer.

Score: 0

|

Sometimes it's better to settle out of court than to drag the company name through the dirt, and waste all that time that subscribers could be paying fees.

It's a sad state of affairs when it's better to cave in to black mail artists like NTP, but in business the bottom line is what is important.

Score: 0

|

unfortunetly it looks like NTP wasn't going to give up. it still is pretty bad though an american company can't grasp that a canadian company invented somthing before them that makes loads of money.

Score: 0

|

Latest Firefox 3.6 beta fixes 133 bugs, promises faster page load times

A once-sluggish beta testing process has kicked into overdrive, with astonishing success at finding serious bugs. Will Mozilla be able to fix all the others in time?

Apple invokes DMCA, claims Psystar is 'trafficking in circumvention devices'

In trying to close the book on possibly the last attempt at a Mac clone, Apple cites from its own landmark case...but may actually be misinterpreting it.

The fallacy of Facebook privacy

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: If an insurance company learns something interesting about its client through the Internet, is that snooping?

Microsoft 'worked with Apple' for Silverlight on iPhone, says Goldfarb

By not making such a big deal out of trying to stream video to the iPhone, Microsoft got a big deal out of it, revealed the Silverlight product manager.

Confirmed: Office 2010 to ship in June

Two weeks after Microsoft had been expected to draw a clearer roadmap for its principal applications suite, it's finally ready to commit to the end of H1.

New EU antitrust commissioner will oversee Microsoft, Oracle+Sun, Intel issues

As one of Europe's most prominent politicians shifts positions in January, her replacement remains a question mark over technology's biggest issues.

Without its own 'iTablet' yet, is Apple missing the boat?

Steve Jobs is on record as dissing "single-purpose" devices like e-readers. But given their recent popularity, was that a mistake?

Not-so-mobile battery life: Time to force the issue

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: If power efficiency is important when you buy a car or even a motorcycle, why shouldn't it matter for a smartphone?

Clicker.com cuts through the Web video chaos

In a world where homemade video and Hollywood movies travel the same pipeline, it's good to have a real search engine to cut through the clutter.

Microsoft's Ray Ozzie: 'Nobody's going to be 100% open'

The mobile apps ecosystems of the world may converge over time, led by apps being ported over across platforms, according to the Chief Software Architect.

A case study in improving software: What Office 2010 can learn from Notion 3

A music composition product gambles with a complete overhaul, in an effort to make headway against two well-known competitors in a tough market.