Visto, Microsoft settle patent dispute out of court

By Ed Oswald | Published March 3, 2008, 4:14 PM

Just ahead of a hearing set to begin next Monday on Visto's claims of patent infringement against the Redmond company, the two sides have settled.

Both sides will drop any legal claims as a result of the agreement. Visto had accused Microsoft of infringing on three patents surrounding the synchronization of mobile data. The original suit was filed in December 2005.

Specifically, Visto accused Microsoft of infringing on three patents. These patents cover the system and methods to securely synchronize copies of a workspace element in a network, the method of accessing this data from a computer network, as well as the data manager access, manipulation and synchronization technique.

Both the terms of the deal and any payout to Visto were not disclosed.

"We are pleased that Microsoft agreed to this arrangement which we believe reinforces our ownership of these crucial inventions and technology," Visto co-founder and technology chief Daniel Mendez said in a statement.

The suit was filed around the same time as the RIM/NTP battle. In fact, the day before Visto originally sued Microsoft, it settled with NTP on similar claims. It also has a unsettled suit with BlackBerry maker RIM.

That is set to go to trial in July of this year.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

lol

Score: 0

|

I am surprise Visto didn't sue Microsoft for infringed their name and trademark. After all Vista is very close to Visto ;)

Score: 0

|

at 1st thats what i thought this article was going 2 be about lol

Score: 0

|

So if I were to buy a Dell Vostro with Vista and synch to my mobile device, it would be a combination of Vostro Vista Visto? Say that ten times. I shouldn't drink and post at the same time. :(

Score: 0

|

Vostro Vista Visto Vostro vista visto! doh!

Score: 0

|

After telling US to mind its own business, Kroes slaps caps on Rambus royalties

The holder of many patents worldwide pertaining to DDR memory offered to reduce its royalty stake in that technology, and today the EU said yes.

Why Apple succeeds, and always will

The company consistently plays by different rules, literally like David did in his battle against Goliath.

EC's Kroes to US senators: Mind your own business on Oracle + Sun

UPDATED The EU's antitrust chief told the United States Senate Tuesday that any merger that takes place in the world is more her affair than theirs.

Betanews Podcast: Rupert Murdoch and the buying stuff online problem

We'll have a more difficult time paying for online news if the underlying protocol for online payment has a big gaping hole in it.

In a peace offering to newspapers, Google offers a new news format

It's probably not a solution to the woes of major news publishers, but Living Stories may gather a few of those publishers together in search of one.

Google Maps doesn't prevent car accidents, only search accidents

This week, Google updated Maps for Android 3.3.1, adding topography, nearby points of interest, and error reporting.

DOJ: Microsoft interop docs are now 'substantially complete'

A major milestone in the US Government's oversight of Microsoft is passed, as the Justice Dept. is now saying the company's protocol documents make sense.

The $1 DVD rental debate: LA group says Redbox will lose movie makers $1B

A report from the Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation says cheap Redbox DVD rentals could seriously damage the movie business.

First impressions of Droid: Easy, breezy, friendly, if a little fat

Though it's not quite as well-polished as Apple's iPhone OS, the version of Android that Motorola's Droid phone sports is still a breeze to use.

Windows fix for TLS security bug still forthcoming, won't be Tuesday

Anyone looking for a fix for last month's discovery of a potentially serious security hole in TLS and SSL may have to wait until everyone is ready to act together.

Not the first, not the last, technology predictions for 2010

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: The real truth is probably that what went around in 2009, will come around to haunt us next year.