RSSWal-Mart Tests Movie Download Service with All Major Studios
By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published February 6, 2007, 12:11 PM
This morning, the US' leading retailer is rolling out what it calls a "beta" of its pay-per-download video service, though the "pay" part is clearly turned on. What immediately differentiates Wal-Mart's Video Downloads Store from its competition -- other than undercutting their prices by about 11 cents -- is that it features new and recent releases from every major Hollywood studio, including Sony (Columbia, Screen Gems, MGM), Warner Bros., 20th Century-Fox, Disney, Paramount, Universal, and Lionsgate.
So while studios continue their long bargaining process with technology brands such as Netflix, Amazon's Unbox, and Apple's iTunes, holding firm on their retail price "suggestions," it behooves them to not risk alienating themselves from their principal retail outlet, which analysts estimate is responsible for at least 40% of all DVD sales to US customers.
Wal-Mart launched this morning with titles such as Warner's Superman Returns downloadable at $14.88, compared with $14.99 at Unbox. Wal-Mart is notorious, even in its retail outlets, for never pricing anything with the classic "99-cent suffix," to help give the appearance of deeper discounts.
While Wal-Mart wrestles with some minor technical issues dealing with its HP Digital Media Platform (a few of which we noticed this morning, such as losing track of the customer ID in sessions lasting longer than five minutes), competitors such as Netflix that were hoping as far back as early 2004 to conquer the broadband download market find themselves playing catch up.
Last month, Netflix announced it was resuming the countdown for its broadband video service, but this time only as a streaming video system rather than downloadable video. Subscribers there could pay $5.99 per month for six hours of online viewing, or subscribe to the full movies-by-mail service for $17.99 per month to receive 18 hours of streaming.
Netflix settled for this deal after negotiations with major studios bogged down in late 2005, after it found itself unable to secure distribution licenses from studios after having announced a distribution partnership with television industry nemesis TiVo.
But ironically, the entry of Wal-Mart into the video market could alleviate one of Netflix' and others' major obstacles to starting or boosting their downloadable services, analysts are saying today. Up to this point, studios have avoided setting their asking price too low for downloadable video, for fear of creating too enticing a price tier for bargain hunters, and in so doing upsetting Wal-Mart, whose relationship must be attended to carefully.
Now, the Wal-Mart price could potentially set a benchmark for the rest of the industry to follow: roughly $15 per first-run title downloaded (subtract 22 cents if you're Wal-Mart).
Ironically, though, for Netflix and potential competitors like Blockbuster to have this roadblock lifted, they may want Wal-Mart's efforts to succeed, in order that the industry and consumers alike will start to perceive $15 as the benchmark movie download price. So any technical support they may be willing to offer at this point to help Wal-Mart get over the initial glitches, may be much appreciated.
Does these movies come with subtitles? i am hearing impaired, they should add subtitles to all movies.
Score: 0
Nice debut Wal-Mart (sarcasm)! I purchased The Chappelle's Show, Season 2, Episode 1, and the download hasn't gone past 0%. It's just sitting there. Firewall issue maybe?
Score: 0
All these download movie services are a joke. For $1-3 more get the DVD version, better video, audio and extras, and you can take it to a friend's house, let someone borrow it, and even rip a smaller version for a media device.
Please tell me what the advantage to a downloadable movie is?
Score: 0
Well, Blu-Ray and HD-DVD need to move to the sidelines a bit more--downloadable=copyable. I'm sure there's all sorts of DRM type of stuff, but software is software and everything can and will be copied. All that invisible water color and fancy AACS encryption means nothing for Blu-Ray now it seems...
Score: 0
There is absolutely nothing more important than audio and video quality when it comes to watching a good movie. If a copy of a recent movie doesn't at least have surround sound and true 480p video (preferably high definition video) then there really is no point in buying it.
Score: 0
There is absolutely nothing more important than audio and video quality when it comes to watching a good movie.
To who?
Heh...I must be living in the dark-ages. Basic Cable quality is still good enough for me.
Hell, an 800kbit xvid rip of most movies and tv shows is good enough for me.
*shrug*
I don't ask for much. :p
Score: 0
Tool,
You're so low tech! ;-)
I at the other end of the spectrum... I barely watch standard definition TV anymore, and any movies I rent have to be either in HD-DVD, or at the very least upconverted to 1080i.
What makes me laugh is that while the selection is still rather small, the XBox360 is getting a pretty good selection of HD movies. A few more months and it may actually make a small dent in the other downloadable stores... (That's my hope at least...)
~dnc
Score: 0
You're so low tech! ;-)
I prefer the term, "old-school". :p
Score: 0
heh
Score: 0