Adware Firm Zango, FTC Settle for $3M

By Ed Oswald, BetaNews

November 3, 2006, 4:54 PM

Internet advertising firm Zango -- previously known as 180solutions -- has settled with the federal government, agreeing to pay $3 million in fines to settle charges that they used deceived consumers into downloading adware and obstructed them from removing it, in violation of federal law.

However in a statement, the former adware company attempted to shift the blame, saying it depended too much on its affiliates to enforce its policies. Even so, Zango apologized for the negative impact it had on consumers.

The settlement would bar Zango from downloading software onto a consumer's computer without his or her consent and provide clear methods to uninstall it, in addition to the fine. Altogether, the company's software has been installed on computers 70 million times, serving some 3.6 billion popup ads, the FTC alleged.

The FTC also seemed to indicate that it was the third parties that Zango contracted its network out to were the problem, however it also seemed to infer that the company actively participated in the scheme.

"Consumers' computers belong to them, and they shouldn't have to accept any content they don't want," said Lydia Parnes, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection. "If consumers choose to receive pop-up ads, so be it. But it violates federal law to secretly install software that forces consumers to get pop-ups that disrupt their computer use."

The decision on the settlement was unanimous, 5-0. However, it does not signal an admission of guilt or violation of law, Zango pointed out.

"The FTC's leadership in providing clarity around best practices is a welcome and significant step forward for Zango and our industry," Zango CEO Keith Smith. "We embrace the new standards and will continue to create, abide by and strive for best practices that protect consumers."

It said the FTC's current standards reflect Zango's current business practices.

Zango, then 180solutions, sued security company Zone Labs in December of last year accusing it of hurting its business through removing its software and posting "misleading statements about 180's products that are contained in the ZoneAlarm product have caused certain content vendors to refuse to contract with 180, harming 180's business and subscribers."

But the company came under increased scrutiny and criticism following the move, and announced plans to clean up its act by mid-month. By the end of January, Zango dropped the lawsuit, without providing any reasoning.

Zango was created in a June merger of both 180solutions and fellow adware company Hotbar.

Add a Comment (14 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By c4p0ne

posted Nov 6, 2006 - 7:08 PM

How about, send a homicide bomber to Zango's offices and show them with a few limbs strewn about that people mean BUSINESS about NOT having YOUR BUSINESS forced on their pcs.

Score: 0

By joeshmoe7

posted Nov 6, 2006 - 12:20 PM

"We embrace the new standards and will continue to create, abide by and strive for best practices that protect consumers."

How about, just go away... forever.

Score: 0

By Point Zero

posted Nov 6, 2006 - 10:52 AM

WTF is $3M for such thieves, they pay it with a smile, the bas****s.

Score: 0

By WeezulDK

posted Nov 6, 2006 - 9:13 AM

"The decision on the settlement was unanimous, 5-0. However, it does not signal an admission of guilt or violation of law, Zango pointed out."

Gee, Let's see, the FTC investigates your trade practices, finds you in VIOLATION of federal statutes and LAWS, FINES you 3 million dollars, and imposes restrictions on you?

Ummm forgive me if I'm wrong here, but....

YOU DON'T GET FINED FOR DOING NOTHING WRONG!

I'm so sick of legal BS... Quite simply, the ONLY reason that Zango is "claiming" that they didn't violate the law is to *attempt* to head off any civil suits that will effectively shut them down.

This is where the government needs to file a criminal lawsuit that cannot be "settled out of court".

Score: 0

By c4p0ne

posted Nov 6, 2006 - 8:06 AM

I think they need to go after these guys and PUT THEM IN PRISON. This, to me, is a very serious crime. Thats why the laws need to be HIGHLY revised. I recently had the utter displeasure of having to deal with a VERACIOUS piece of DEMONIC ad/spy/viralware which immediately upon running of the infected .exe, installed and literally DRILLED ROOTS into the system in such a way that, had I not already been a ravaged war-veteran survivor of this very kind of thing, there is NO WAY IN HELL that I could have eliminated it without the [unfortunately] all-too-common and usually unjustified "f*ck it just format" syndrome.

Anyway, the new beta version 2.7 of NOD was left cowering and unable to completely un-root this satanic menace. Only after lightning quick damage control procedures was I able to FINALLY after about a whole 22 minutes able to unhinge the jaws ONE BY ONE (handle by handle) in order to be able to terminate processes and delete files associated with them.

Then it was a matter of cleaning MANY other horrific things that this thing had done to the system in order to preserve it's own unwarranted hideous existence. There is no f*cking way that ANYONE IN ANY COURT OF LAW can excuse the actions this CRAP takes on any particular machine. How the f* do these guys not wind up getting their fudge packed? Is the government so utterly stupid (or maybe brilliant depending how you look at it)?

BTW this is the first time I've seen sh*tware so VICIOUSLY protect itself. "NO AVERAGE USER would have EVER been able to remove this" is what i was thinking through the whole ordeal as i was struggling to remove this thing. And believe me 22 minutes when dealing with something that is obviously attempting to sink deeper into the system by the moment is NOT a short time. It feels like a lifetime!

I swear I would even consider the death-penalty for people that ALLOW this garbage to do what it does. And i'm ANTI death-pentaly. Watch out for anything labeled DeluxeCommunications because once that gets in its not your only problem, it automatically installs other crap like NewDotNet (classicly vicious but nothing compared to DXC) and a plethora of side-sh*t. DeluxeCommunications exe's can't be immediately killed or suspended because they hook to prevent this and also remove debug privs for the same (and other) reasons.

just watch out because KAV, NOD, etc wont help much against unknown variants such as the one i was SO unfortunate to stumble on.

Zango is angelware compared to some of the other things out there. We need to stand up and open our mouths when given a chance because these people CAN NOT continue to get away with this!!!!!!

Score: 0

By TheRecklessWanderer

posted Nov 5, 2006 - 10:28 PM

Let the (civil) lawsuits begin. that's where the pain will come from.

Score: 0

By BIL

edited Nov 5, 2006 - 9:04 PM

We need laws that stop all companies from putting files on our computers that are not fully explained in simple terms. And we need laws that stop this crap about "not admitting guilt". If they are found innocent let it say so. If they are found guilty, let it say so. Now is the time to start making this a part of the laws. If found guilty all the profits should be split up between the users that sustained damage and on enforcemnt and prosecution of these and other companies engaged in similar practices. This is an election year. Email your congressman now.

Score: 0

By poles18

posted Nov 5, 2006 - 7:26 PM

they screwed up many comps thier company should be removed or sewed for all they own

Score: 0

By wincement

posted Nov 6, 2006 - 5:48 PM

Pardon me, but what does cross-stitching have to do with this? Do they have a rip in their sweater?

Sorry... had to. =p

Score: 0

By wincement

posted Nov 5, 2006 - 5:15 PM

THAT'S ALL!?

Talk about injustice...

Score: 0

By Mutal1ty

posted Nov 4, 2006 - 7:33 PM

I'f you've ever been infected by these POS's you'll understand when I recommend the companies stripped of ALL assets have their throats slit, families killed, and donate all procedes from the aquisition and public broadcasting of the deaths donated to the implementaion of IPV6 :-/

Score: 0

By 33Nick

posted Nov 3, 2006 - 10:40 PM

Just one question... What will th FCC do with that money?

Will they give it back to users who have been hurt in the process?

Yum, yum, can you spell freebie!

Score: 0

By TheRecklessWanderer

posted Nov 5, 2006 - 10:29 PM

FCC didn't get the money, according to the article, it was the FTC. Trade, not communications.

Score: 0

By drumcat

posted Nov 3, 2006 - 5:05 PM

That's getting off easy for what they did...

Score: 0