Apple Fixes Java Vulnerabilities

By the Betanews Staff | Published April 19, 2006, 3:58 PM

Apple has issued a security update to patch a potential vulnerability within Java affecting Mac OS X 10.4.5. A specially crafted application could bypass built-in security and allow access to system files by an intruder. The problem is located within Java Web Start, which loads Java applications over the Internet.

Also, other bugs within the Java runtime that pose a potential security risk were also fixed as part of the update. Mac OS X is not the only operating system affected by the issues. Windows, Solaris and Linux are also vulnerable. In February, Sun issued an advisory warning of both flaws, and said at the time that no reports of attackers exploiting the issues had been received.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

Hmm, I thought that was the reason to use Java in the first place because stuff like this couldn't happen? I guess nobody bothered to check the loaders sandbox.

DOH!

Score: 0

|

Funny--no msjava vulnerability exploits anymore--only Sun Java. I find that interesting...

Score: 0

|

That's because there is no MS Java anymore. Sun took care of that via the legal system when MS intentionally horked it's Java implementation, in direct viloation of their Sun contract, to advance its' own C# initiative. The thought was if they could prove to users that Java was a buggy language, then they could easily sell them on the idea of wanting C# implementations done for them instead of Java.

Ka-CHING!!!

Score: 0

|

Well--msjava still exists on my pc. Instal windows xp WITHOUT any service packs slipstreamed, then install sp2--bada-boom bada-bing...

Score: 0

|

Yeah, same here. I actually prefer MS Java VM to Sun's Java runtime bcos MS Java VM is much faster.

Anyway, this article only proves once again that nothing is secure. MacOS + Sun Java --> not secure either (although arguably more secure than Windows).

Score: 0

|

..... lol ....
where are the fanboys now ???

Score: 0

|

First, read the article...
But just in case you missed it it says

"Mac OS X is not the only operating system affected by the issues. Windows, Solaris and Linux are also vulnerable. In February, Sun issued an advisory warning..."

Wow... a vulnerablility in a 3rd party Java plugin that affects Windows, Solaris, OSX and Linux, WOW!

That vulnerability pretty much affects everyone so read before you start pointing the finger and starting the "my OS is better than yours" bullsh*t

Score: 0

|

Rather then simply focusing on the Java deficiency that effects all of the platforms, it seems the real focus is on the response to the common threat. And it seems that while Sun has issued an advisory (I guess it's nice to know that you are exposed!), ONLY Apple has thus far posted a fix for the vulnerability!

Let's see, MS can't get Vista to run under EFI and subsequently kills support for it in Vista - despite EFI being out x86 for only 8 years now, and now Apple is the first to develop a fix. If anything, the Apple developers seem to have a few steps up on the folks in Redmond.

Rather then seeing this article as focusing on Apple and a software deficiency, it seems that the correct focus is on Apple's being first to remediate the situation.
;-)

Score: 0

|

You are forgetting that Windows has a 90% or so marketshare. Every single patch that they release has to go through 10 times as much QA as others. Also, Windows is being used by most enterprises. The same cant really be said of MacOS.

This makes it even more important to ensure that a patch does not cause any side effect.

Even then, they still screw up once in a while. Although most of the time, you dont hear system admins complaining about certain MS patch screwing up their systems.

Score: 0

|

Mark Russinovich on MinWin, the new core of Windows

The next version of Windows three years hence will likely build onto a significant architectural change implemented in Windows 7 and Server 2008 R2.

Security firm: Windows patches not responsible for 'Black Screen of Death'

On second thought, maybe that access control list thingie with the lockdown something-or-rather didn't trigger an alleged, perhaps non-existent, pandemic.

My Windows 7 confession (and why you should confess, too)

I've held back the real reason for sticking with Windows 7, even as, gulp, iLife calls me to go back to the Mac.

Apple settles with Psystar except for 'circumvention devices'

The fracas with the Florida clone computer maker might have ended today had Apple not have muddled the issue over a cheap piece of Psystar software.

Google begrudgingly adjusts news crawling for paid publishers

If publishers want to make readers pay for news content, and thereby drive down its popularity and Google ranking, the company says, they can just go right on ahead.

Fee or free? Murdoch, Huffington square off over the cost of Internet news

Participants in an FTC workshop yesterday witnessed the two extremes of the Web news publishing debate, still centered on the issue of long-term profitability.

Microsoft denies latest 'Black Screen of Death' claims

After an anti-malware producer announced a fix to what it says is a swarm of recent KSoD problems, evidence of the swarm itself has yet to turn up.

Latest Firefox 3.6 beta fixes 133 bugs, promises faster page load times

A once-sluggish beta testing process has kicked into overdrive, with astonishing success at finding serious bugs. Will Mozilla be able to fix all the others in time?

Confirmed: Office 2010 to ship in June

Two weeks after Microsoft had been expected to draw a clearer roadmap for its principal applications suite, it's finally ready to commit to the end of H1.

New EU antitrust commissioner will oversee Microsoft, Oracle+Sun, Intel issues

As one of Europe's most prominent politicians shifts positions in January, her replacement remains a question mark over technology's biggest issues.

Without its own 'iTablet' yet, is Apple missing the boat?

Steve Jobs is on record as dissing "single-purpose" devices like e-readers. But given their recent popularity, was that a mistake?