Apple to Pay Creative $100 Million

By Nate Mook, BetaNews

August 23, 2006, 5:35 PM

Apple has agreed to pay Creative Technology $100 million to resolve all legal disputes between the two companies regarding patent infringement, and in a stunning reversal, Creative has announced it will join Apple's "Made for iPod" program.

Creative first sued Apple on May 15, accusing the company of infringement of the so-called Zen Patent. That patent involves the method for selecting at least one track on a portable player as a user sequentially browses through a hierarchy of three or more screens on the display.

Apple moved quickly and countersued the company on the same day, claiming infringement on four patents of its own. A second lawsuit was filed by Apple against Creative in June, accusing the company of violating three patents: one that involves the display of data on a computer; another involving the process of editing data using a portable device; and one involving the creation of icons for organizational purposes.

As a result of the settlement, Apple will receive a license to use Creative's Zen Patent in all of its products. If creative is able to license the patent to other companies without it being invalidated, Apple will be entitled to receive an undisclosed amount of the $100 million back as a reimbursement.

"Creative is very fortunate to have been granted this early patent," said Apple CEO Steve Jobs. "This settlement resolves all of our differences with Creative, including the five lawsuits currently pending between the companies, and removes the uncertainty and distraction of prolonged litigation."

In addition, Creative has dramatically changed its tune on the iPod, embracing its rival and joining Apple's partner program.

"Apple has built a huge ecosystem for its iPod and with our upcoming participation in the Made for iPod program we are very excited about this new market opportunity for our speaker systems, our just-introduced line of earphones and headphones, and our future family of X-Fi audio enhancement products," commented Creative CEO Sim Wong Hoo.

The shift comes as Creative struggles to remain relevant in the MP3 player industry. SanDisk has taken second place in the market, far behind Apple's iPod, while Creative's share has continued to shrink. However, the company is reportedly preparing a new Zen Vision player for a debut later this year.

Add a Comment (23 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By digitalking

posted Aug 24, 2006 - 8:45 AM

Once there is one MP3 player, Apple will charge whatever they want. 2.99 a song, 500 for a mini Ipod. People think it is cool that Ipod is blowing everyone out of the MP3 game. It is only bad for the consumer. Just like Microsoft can charge whatever they want for their OS, because what are people going to do, spend time learning a new OS, which took Joe Blow years to learn how to operate?

Score: 0

By Secret Agent Man

posted Aug 24, 2006 - 8:33 AM

I'm just glad somebody stepped forward (regardless of motive) and was the bigger man in this. All of these lawsuits over patents just irritates me to end. Not so much the lawsuits, but the patents themselves. It's honestly getting ridiculous. "I have the patent of a user clicking a button on the computer! Any other company that tries to steal this idea will be sued by us!" The idea that some people can own these methods is really nonsense, especially in cases where the idea could easily be thought of by more than one person or company.

Either way, I'm glad the five pending lawsuits will be no more now (five lawsuits over frivilous patents).

Score: 0

By dhjdhj

posted Aug 24, 2006 - 1:11 PM

Yep, very easy to come up with an idea once someone else already has!

--->idea could easily be thought of by more than one person or company.

Score: 0

By Grazer

posted Aug 24, 2006 - 1:31 PM

Actually there have been several times in history where complex non-obvious inventions where concurrently developed successfully in isolation from each other...and those were complex non-obvious working inventions, very different from the patented simple reasonably-obvious unimplemented ideas of today.

Score: 0

By deminicus

posted Aug 24, 2006 - 8:15 AM

if you cant beat them, join them.

Score: 0

By AntiochMedia

posted Aug 24, 2006 - 1:28 AM

Looks like Creative will post a profit on their MP3 division this quarter. This has been the biggest watershed for them topping sales of their devices and other products.

Congrats Creative - you're making money by technicalities and legal battles, proof that Creative is staying competitive with other technological greats who failed to innovate in the past few years.

And yes, I'm a very proud Creative Labs Nomad Zen Jukebox owner. I don't actually use the device though since it in no way compares to an iPod or River.

Score: 0

By Tenoq

posted Aug 23, 2006 - 9:44 PM

Jobs has done a sensible thing here - the litigation would just be distracting and not profitable for either company, in the end. By settling this way, the iPod can exist as-is with no future threats from Creative, while Creative can reinforce the already dominant iTunes system with their support. Win-win for Creative and Apple, and will make it easy for consumers with less compatibility issues.

Score: 0

By ds0934

posted Aug 23, 2006 - 9:33 PM

wow. just goes to show, nobody is immune to things like this.

Score: 0

By zridling

posted Aug 23, 2006 - 9:18 PM

The secret to Apple's innovation? Theft!

Score: 0

By Tenoq

posted Aug 23, 2006 - 9:40 PM

The secret to Creative's failure? Theft x 4! :P

Score: 0

By NEOBassDUDE

posted Aug 23, 2006 - 8:51 PM

Will Zens come with the iPod dock connector??

(It'd be nice to have a zen in my car :)

Score: 0

By Sexbarril

posted Aug 23, 2006 - 7:48 PM

Looks more and more like the two choices that are gonna be around are...you guessed it MS and the other..in this case the other is Apple.

Oh well, as long as there is good competition, the consumer benefits...

I wonder which will kill which...

Latz, SB

Score: 0

By Skyfrog

posted Aug 23, 2006 - 7:58 PM

Neither, both companies need each other. Apple would have been gone already if Microsoft had wnated that, but instead they bought shares of Apple and bailed the company out.

What does Latz mean?

Score: 0

By Tenoq

posted Aug 23, 2006 - 9:40 PM

Apple was not bailed out by Microsoft. They had over $1b in cash, and Microsoft contributed only $200m. The 'bail out' was sensationalised media bulls***.

Score: 0

By dhjdhj

posted Aug 24, 2006 - 1:19 PM

Really? As I recall, Apple was having serious problems at the time - I don't think they had huge cash reserves such as you describe.

Score: 0

By Grazer

edited Aug 24, 2006 - 6:32 PM

As I recall, Apple was having serious problems at the time - I don't think they had huge cash reserves such as you describe.
I remember the same thing. Maybe they had $1B in assets, which is alot different. It is never a good sign when anybody starts selling their assets because they need cash; I speak from personal experience.

Score: 0

By Tenoq

posted Aug 24, 2006 - 9:56 PM

Nope, $1B in cash. Check your history - not your sensationalised media.

Score: 0

By Skyfrog

posted Aug 24, 2006 - 12:40 AM

Ok I was obviously mistaken on that part then but my point still stands, Microsoft obviously did not want Apple dead or they wouldn't have contributed at all.

Score: 0

By Frostek

posted Aug 23, 2006 - 7:47 PM

There's not really many logical systems for organising songs on an MP3 player except by using a "hierarchy"-based system.

well, I suppose you could have a several thousand long list of MP3s... Might take a while to find things though!

A feeble patent.

Score: 0

By Desides

posted Aug 23, 2006 - 6:59 PM

So Creative gets some money that they'll piss away in a couple of years, Apple loses a "competitor," such as Creative was.

I'd say Apple wins.

Score: 0

By trebort

edited Sep 7, 2006 - 12:41 PM

I don't think apple are loosing a competitor. They have entered the mad for Ipod scheme so they can sell more speakers etc. They will still be making mp3 players. I hope both Creative, Sandisk and Iriver all do a good job at it too as nothing good for consumers will come of an even more ipod dominated market! While I don't like the similar method Micorosft are going with the Zuma at least it will help put a dent in the Itunes Domination.

Score: 0

By AaronDobbins

posted Aug 23, 2006 - 9:15 PM

Especially considering Apple sold roughly 8 million iPods in the last quarter and posted revenues of $4.37 BILLION. I'd say $100 million is a drop in the bucket to get Creative off their backs and probably as you said, kill the Zen.

Score: 0

By spongy-poo

posted Aug 23, 2006 - 6:39 PM

LOL! Another iPod killer...dead!

Score: 0