Arthur C. Clarke (1917 - 2008)

By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published March 20, 2008, 11:25 AM

There are so few gentle geniuses left. One more has passed: a man who could not only dream magnificent new things could come about, but who had the competence to actually make his dreams reality.

When most people I know think of Arthur C. Clarke, they think of 2001: A Space Odyssey, and almost immediately, they conjure images and sounds of HAL the computer, spaceships landing in overlit, white parlor rooms, dancing orangutans, Johann Strauss music intertwined with Richard Strauss music, and innocent young fetuses hanging in space. That's generally when I say they're confusing Clarke for Stanley Kubrick.

A much more practically minded, ironically "down-to-earth" free thinker on the topic of exploring the cosmos, passed yesterday after a long bout with polio -- strangely not at all like the metaphorical, allegorical man the movie most associated with him would have you believe Arthur C. Clarke was. I was introduced to Clarke in my youth as someone who had brought about, from the envisioning stage to the engineering stage, one of humanity's greatest achievements: the global satellite telecommunications system.

In 1951, over six years before the Soviets would try it themselves, Clarke -- then working as an assistant editor for the house organ publication of the forerunner of the IEEE, and inspired by the response to a 1950 treatise on interplanetary travel he's published there -- wrote the simple book that served as the blueprint for the world's space program: The Exploration of Space. There, he connected the dots between the multi-stage rockets the US had acquired from having captured Werner von Braun's V-2 team, and the mechanism necessary to take men to the moon for the first time.

It would have a massive booster for escaping the Earth's field of gravity, but mostly in order to carry into orbit the fuel load required to blast the landing craft to the moon. That craft would be a surprisingly non-aerodynamic structure designed to help brake its descent.

The landing, like the take-off, would almost certainly be automatic. A radar altimeter would give the exact distance to the Moon as well as the rate of descent, and this information would be passed to an electronic computer which would control the motors. The ship would descend according to a prearranged program that would bring it to rest a few feet above the moon.

It is rather natural to imagine that a rocket descending tail first in this manner would be a highly unstable affair and liable to "topple." But it must be remembered that, as far as the automatic controls are concerned, there is no fundamental difference between a 1-g vertical landing and 1-g vertical take-off. If the gyroscopes and steering devices can deal with the one case -- as they already do in the V.2 rocket -- they can deal just as well with the other.

Arthur C. Clarke, The Exploration of Space (1951)

It was not exactly a snapshot of Apollo. But for many scientists and laypersons, it was their first exposure to the concept of "G-force" -- a term some say Clarke may have coined, though he'd deny it -- as the resistance we experience whenever we attain such a velocity that we broach the idea of leaving the ground behind. And it was the first time anyone had actually, realistically drawn a picture of a lunar voyage, using the "figure-8" diagram that became affixed in our minds through the 1960s and early '70s, as a real-world map rather than a fantasy drawing.

The Exploration of Space was noteworthy for one other very important contribution: It was the very first published treatise anywhere on the idea that an orbital satellite could achieve a velocity that placed it at geo-station with the Earth below: that a device could be fixed in orbit. That led Clarke to conclude immediately that it could be used as a permanent, worldwide communications relay.

The global telecommunications network as it exists today was germinated, quite literally, in the mind of Arthur C. Clarke.

Complete coverage of the whole Earth would be provided by three stations, revolving in the same orbit but spaced 120 degrees apart.

The obvious orbit for this purpose would be the twenty-four-hour one, 22,000 miles above the Equator. Any point on the Earth's surface would then have at least one station permanently visible in the sky -- and moreover, fixed in the sky, unlike those wayward bodies the Sun, Moon and stars.

Perhaps the most exciting prospect raised by the relay chain is that it would make a world-wide system of television practicable. It is, indeed, almost impossible to imagine any other way in which this could be done, since the curve of the Earth limits the range of all surface transmitters, no matter how powerful, to less than a hundred miles. Three stations in space, linked to each other by microwave beams, could provide a television service over the whole planet for no more power than one of today's larger transmitters.

...High-frequency waves...would make possible an almost unlimited number of interference-free communication channels, and would provide navigation and air safety services beyond anything in prospect today. A world society must possess a fast and reliable system of communications. The use of radio relays in space could provide this on a scale quite impossible by any other means, and at very great economy.

Arthur C. Clarke, The Exploration of Space (1951)

Next: The view from space...

1 | 2 | Next Page →

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

Near light speed propulsion is possible.

http://nlspropulsion.net

Score: 0

|

thir goes another great English man that gave to the world like so many before him

Score: 0

|

RIP Mr. Clarke. :(

Score: 0

|

At a time when the Cold War nearly froze relations between our two great countries (US & USSR), Clarke always fostered cooperation and communication so we could achieve greater discovery than we alone could. Clarke saw the big picture, the whole of humanity working together to build a better world.

I thoroughly recommend viewing both 2001 and its lesser known sequel, 2010. Be sure to also check out his books at Amazon or another bookseller. They take you on fascinating journeys throughout our universe.

Score: 0

|

who? never heard of him :-)

Score: 0

|

Its very sad, and even tragedy for science fiction....

But let me add 5 cents to it. Way before Clarke Russian genius Tsiolkovsky predict entire concept of rockets, space flights etc. Pretty much Russians success in space depends on his work. Even today!

http://en.wikipedia.org/.../Konstantin_Tsiolkovsky

Score: 0

|

And don't forget another important person:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herman_Poto%C4%8Dnik

Score: 0

|

Great man. He will be always be remembered as among the great thinkers of the past century.

Score: 0

|

Excellent, poignant homage to a great man and, let it not be forgotten, a great entertainer. To paraphrase Clarke himself, "Passing into history now, receding forever down the stream of time, are some of the most incredible adventurers the world has ever seen." We've lost Sir Ed (Hillary) and Sir Arthur (Clarke) in a short span of time. We're diminshed by their loss, but ennobled by their lives, achievements, and examples. Let's hope there are worthy successors in their wakes...

David Hammer, 54
Ft. Lauderdale, FL

Score: 0

|

I will sadly miss Mr. Bradbury. He and Isaac Asimov were my introduction to the incredible world of science fiction as a child in the late 60's... a time when the imagination of the world was ablaze with the wonders of the space race and it's impact on us all.

--Orv

Score: 0

|

Indeed. Another sad loss for us all. There aren't many visionaries left like him. If any.

Score: 0

|

PTL,
Go be dammned lefty goose!

Score: 0

|

???

Score: 0

|

Will Firefox beat IE9 to Direct2D rendering?

Just days after Microsoft executives gave conference attendees a peek at a new rendering technology, a Mozilla contributor revealed he's working on the same thing.

AOL's decision to rebrand as Aol. takes a bad brand and makes it worse

The idea behind the social Web is to crowd source before bringing out something new. But not at AOL, which new logo debuted with a cry of "fail!" across the blogosphere and Twittersphere today.

Microsoft's Bob Muglia and Ray Ozzie on Silverlight vs. standards

Bob Muglia: "We're trying to provide people with an environment that has capabilities that you just simply can't do today in the standards-based world."

Uh-oh, netbooks -- not Windows 7 -- will lift 2009 PC sales

Santa may bring a lump of coal to the Windows PC industry this holiday season. Netbook sales will sap PC margins, while weak Windows 7 PC sales could further drive down average selling prices.

Kindle 2 update adds battery life, native PDF reader

Amazon has pushed out an update to the Kindle 2 e-reader that lengthens battery life and adds a native PDF viewer.

Safari on iPhone gets competition from a $1 browser app

Apple likes to say it gives iPhone users a full browsing experience, but a new competitor tries to incorporate more desktop browser features.

Action Replay maker sues Microsoft for Xbox 360 'predatory technological barriers'

Third-party video game accessory maker Datel has filed an antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft over the Xbox 360's recent Dashboard update.

Where there's smoke: Apple warranty stance raises troubling questions

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: Smoking can be dangerous not only for your lungs, it appears, but for your Apple hardware warranty.

Microsoft's .NET Micro Framework is now free and open source

The latest version of Microsoft's .NET Micro framework is now in the hands of the FOSS community.

Google's value proposition for Chrome OS: Should we feel insulted?

For a search engine that has direct access to all the world's online history, it appears to have taught Google nothing about selling a machine.

E-book readers will be in short supply this holiday season

E-readers are hot this year, and a lot of compelling new products have been released, but are there enough electrophoretic displays to go around?