Ask.com agrees with Google's critics, issues new privacy safeguards

By Jacqueline Emigh | Published June 20, 2008, 8:48 AM

Number 5 search engine Ask.com has issued an open letter agreeing with the sentiments of privacy buffs while also rolling out new user privacy safeguards for its own platform.

As previously reported, a letter sent to Google in early June by a privacy coalition that includes the Electronic Privacy Center and the Electronic Frontier Foundation contends that "Google's reluctance to post a link to its privacy [policy] on its home page is alarming."

Now, in an open letter to the Web Community and Ask.com users, partly in response to advocacy groups' sharp criticisms of Google's treatment of privacy policies, Ask.com officials are saying they agree with the coalition's argument that making Web links to privacy policies more accessible and conspicuous represents "a commitment by a commercial Web site to inform users about the company's privacy practices."

In an e-mail dated June 18, Ask.com's management also outlined plans to expand on actions already taken toward user privacy protection.

"At Ask, we take our commitment to user privacy and data protection very seriously," according to the e-mail. In December of 2007, Ask released a tool called Eraser, which gives users a one-click process for deleting their own data from Ask servers, the officials pointed out.

"Now we're going several steps further. As of today, Ask.com has added a direct link to our privacy policy via a 'Privacy' link prominently placed right on our homepage," the letter continues. "Ask has also added a conspicuous link to our privacy policy right on our Ask 'About' page, which is one click off our homepage."

In addition, now in the works are new "Smart Answer" search results pages. "When a user goes to Ask.com and types in 'Ask Privacy' or 'Privacy' in the search box, they will get served up a specially designed, robust, and comprehensive results page that is a one-stop shop of answers on both Ask's privacy policies and actions (including AskEraser), as well as on privacy policies in general," according to the open letter.

The e-mail from Ask does not mention search industry leader Google specifically, instead referencing a letter sent several weeks ago by privacy advocates to an unnamed "major company in the search marketplace."

In that letter, no fewer than 14 advocacy groups openly asked Google to post its privacy policy directly from its home page so as to assure compliance with the California Online Privacy Act. The five-year-old California state law requires any commercial Web site that collects personal information about users to "conspicuously post its privacy policy on its Web site."

At BetaNews' press time, Ask spokespersons were unavailable to provide information as to when the new "Smart Answer" pages are expected to be ready on Ask.com.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

5th platform? that's pretty funny they think in that way...

http://searchenginewatch...wPage.html?page=2156451

Google: 49.2%
Yahoo: 23.8%
MSN: 9.6%
AOL: 6.3%
Ask: 2.6%

So yes, not too many people care about ask.com or what they think. Who knows, maybe next press release thate they issue will state:

We're #1 (when counting from the end) and we have bla bla bla to say..!

Score: 0

|

No one cares about ask.com

Score: 0

|

Mark Russinovich on MinWin, the new core of Windows

The next version of Windows three years hence will likely build onto a significant architectural change implemented in Windows 7 and Server 2008 R2.

Security firm: Windows patches not responsible for 'Black Screen of Death'

On second thought, maybe that access control list thingie with the lockdown something-or-rather didn't trigger an alleged, perhaps non-existent, pandemic.

My Windows 7 confession (and why you should confess, too)

I've held back the real reason for sticking with Windows 7, even as, gulp, iLife calls me to go back to the Mac.

Apple settles with Psystar except for 'circumvention devices'

The fracas with the Florida clone computer maker might have ended today had Apple not have muddled the issue over a cheap piece of Psystar software.

Google begrudgingly adjusts news crawling for paid publishers

If publishers want to make readers pay for news content, and thereby drive down its popularity and Google ranking, the company says, they can just go right on ahead.

Fee or free? Murdoch, Huffington square off over the cost of Internet news

Participants in an FTC workshop yesterday witnessed the two extremes of the Web news publishing debate, still centered on the issue of long-term profitability.

Microsoft denies latest 'Black Screen of Death' claims

After an anti-malware producer announced a fix to what it says is a swarm of recent KSoD problems, evidence of the swarm itself has yet to turn up.

Latest Firefox 3.6 beta fixes 133 bugs, promises faster page load times

A once-sluggish beta testing process has kicked into overdrive, with astonishing success at finding serious bugs. Will Mozilla be able to fix all the others in time?

Confirmed: Office 2010 to ship in June

Two weeks after Microsoft had been expected to draw a clearer roadmap for its principal applications suite, it's finally ready to commit to the end of H1.

New EU antitrust commissioner will oversee Microsoft, Oracle+Sun, Intel issues

As one of Europe's most prominent politicians shifts positions in January, her replacement remains a question mark over technology's biggest issues.

Without its own 'iTablet' yet, is Apple missing the boat?

Steve Jobs is on record as dissing "single-purpose" devices like e-readers. But given their recent popularity, was that a mistake?