Company Sues 23 for Text Completion Tech

By Tim Conneally | Published November 14, 2007, 11:30 AM

Delaware firm Autotext Technologies has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against 23 major technology companies including Apple and IBM, regarding predictive word processing.

Autotext is suing the following companies: Apple, AT&T, Helio, Hewlett-Packard, HTC America, IBM, Kyocera, LG Electronics USA, Microsoft, Motorola, Nintendo of America, Nokia, Nuance Communications, Palm, Qualcomm, Research In Motion, Samsung America, Sanyo North America, Sony, Sony Ericsson, T-Mobile, Verizon Wireless, and Zi Corporation.

All companies listed in the lawsuit, Autotext alleges, are infringing on a "computer-based transcription" patent that was filed in 1994. The patent is loosely about predictive word processing, where a list of words is presented when a user begins to input letters, hence the Autotext nomenclature.

Most of the infringing devices are cellular handsets, but the non-phone instances are especially noteworthy. IBM's Lotus Notes, Qualcomm's Eudora 7.1 mail client, Mac's OS X 10.4 and Safari, Nuance's T9 system, and also Nintendo's Wii and Sony's PS3 all come into question in the suit.

Autotext is a subsidiary of Acacia Research, a company in the business of acquiring, developing, licensing and enforcing patents who was recently charged with engaging in frivolous litigation. In August, the company's Micromesh Technology Corp. v. American Recreational Products was deemed a "frivolous infringement investigation" by a Northern California Judge.

The company's latest suit was filed November 9 in the Northern District Court of Ohio.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

wouldn't there be a cross over to the recent patent Wordlogic was just granted this month from the US patent office??

http://tinyurl.com/2k8la8

Score: 0

|

There was a product prior to 1994 that did this on the Macintosh OS 7. I don't recall the name, but I bought the product back then. It would fill in your typing based on what you were typing. It was advertised for people to that didn't type well. :)
I even recall the booth they were selling it in.

Score: 0

|

The prior art part of the patent process was amended in 2004. They may or may not have a case. The amended law has tended to limit the use of prior art as a claim against another company.

Finally, it's interesting that they filed in Ohio where they may feel that they can get a more favorable verdict than in Ca.

Score: 0

|

"In August, the company's Micromesh Technology Corp. v. American Recreational Products was deemed a "frivolous infringement investigation" by a Northern California Judge."

Even a northern California Judge thought it frivilous. Should be struck down...hopefully...

Score: 0

|

Prior art: Dictionary

Score: 0

|

No doubt!

Score: 0

|

Just read (skimmed) through it - while they give an example of specialized cases, the patent doesn't seem to limit itself to that. If there's no prior art or something that was being independently developed when this was filed, they may have a valid case.

My biggest problem here is that predictive data entry really has been around for some time now and it seems a little late to file a lawsuit. Why wasn't a suit filed almost 10 years ago when cell phones were really starting to take advantage of this? Even 5 years ago, I could possibly still see this. Now? It does seem like a waste of time.

Still, unless there's prior art or someone can somehow prove they came up with this idea on their own, they really may have a case.

Score: 0

|

wow, company stays in business just to file lawsuites and waste taxpayer's money.

I also don't belive something "loosely worded" is going to be held as a valid argument the court of law, especially with today when "predictive texting" became a commodity in similar way as "http" protocal, SMS, etc... Stupid case and a waste of time and money.

Score: 0

|

It's the US vs. the EU over Oracle+Sun and the meaning of 'open source'

Now that the EU is a virtual country, the US Justice Dept. is taking a stand in favor of its view -- and against the EC's -- that MySQL will survive under Oracle.

Qualcomm: $1.3 billion Samsung licensing deal unrelated to fair trade violations

Samsung has come to a 15-year licensing deal with Qualcomm over 3G and 4G wireless technology.

Firefox turns five: Thanks for giving us a choice

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: No longer the phoenix rising from the ashes, Mozilla has carried on more than just Netscape's legacy.

If Microsoft sites lead time online, pigs can fly

How can people spend more time at Microsoft sites, when the measure of success is Windows Live Messenger, which sits on the desktop?

European ministers approve watered-down 'neutral net' language

The latest provision in the EU's telecoms regulatory framework would let businesses cancel individuals' Internet access, if they go to court first.

Snow Leopard and Windows 7 still can't crack the netbook problem

Apple has killed Atom support in OS X 10.6.2 and Windows 7 Starter Edition is stripped of "basic" functionality.

Microsoft's Top 3 advances in Exchange Server 2010

The latest round of changes launched today will impact how admins deliver services to e-mail recipients, and how much companies will pay along the way.

Nokia's 'limited number' of recalled chargers exceeds 14 million

Today, the Finnish phone maker has begun a recall of mobile phone chargers that are a shock hazard.

Ubuntu 9.10 upgraders report frustration

For those Wine aficionados out there, beware of the remote possibility that your Linux system could be infected by Windows-seeking malware.

Supreme Court considers patentability of abstract methods today

Can software that executes a formula for a business process qualify for federal patents? An appeals court already said no, and inventors are making their case.

Thanks, iPhone: Google buys mobile advertiser AdMob for $750 million

AdMob came to thrive thanks to the iPhone's popularity, now Google has bought it.