Corel: ODF is One Choice Among Many
By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published December 1, 2006, 6:17 PM
In an upcoming version of WordPerfect due in 2007, Corel announced this week, users will have the options of reading and writing in both Microsoft Office Open XML format (introduced in Office 2007) and OpenDocument Format (ODF). Will WordPerfect become the ODF word processor of record? Corel's answer was surprising.
Last year, Corel -- the manufacturer of WordPerfect Office X3 -- withheld its suite's support for the OpenDocument Format (ODF) for reasons which many at first failed to understand. Corel was, after all, one of the companies that catalyzed the very creation of the format, with its open and vocal support of the OASIS standards group that produced it. Some speculated that Corel's sudden reticence was merely a tip of the hat to Microsoft, which had earlier made a financial investment in the company.
As Corel's general manager for office productivity Richard Carriere told BetaNews at the time, his company had made the assessment that ODF was not yet a mature format, despite the fact that it's the principal format of WordPerfect's leading open source competitor, OpenOffice.
Earlier this week, Corel announced that the probation period for ODF was over. Beginning in the middle of next year -- probably with the next significant update to the WordPerfect suite -- Corel products will include support not only for ODF, but the other new XML-based word processing format of note, Microsoft's Office Open XML (OOXML).
"While we still maintain the ODF format is not complete in terms of definitions for spreadsheets and presentations, or for some formatting for formulas...it is certainly much more advanced in the word processing space," Carriere told BetaNews on Friday. "And then we have customers in the government space in particular who have interest not in adopting ODF aggressively, but they're at the point where they want to test their options."
In a now-characteristically ironic way, it's Microsoft that has prompted these public sector customers to assess these options, Carriere explained. Its move to adopt the .DOCX word processing extension of OOXML as Office 2007's principal format, with traditional .DOC as a standby, has managed to place the subject of format transition on business' discussion dockets in a way no other event, either innovative or catastrophic, would have managed to do. These organizations now are exploring their options. Now, ODF becomes one of them.
"What some of our customers really like in our approach," he told us, "[is] that we're not married to one format or another. We're not biased, and therefore we can help them test and navigate toward those that will make sense. So whether or not everything [in ODF] is ready for prime time, like in the spreadsheet examples, as long as we have customers who really are interested in testing, we want to be there and test with them."
We asked Carriere, suppose a major customer such as a government organization chose to adopt ODF as its default format of choice for WordPerfect. Given the deficiencies in ODF that he continued to point out, wouldn't customers experience reduced functionality - for instance, certain formatting commands that might become unavailable?
Carriere responded by saying that, despite what we read in the news about one or two states or provinces adopting ODF "whole-hog," that's not representative of the customer base at large. "Even the most aggressive government organizations in the news - like the state of Massachusetts, for example - now that reality is coming, they all want to take a bit more time assessing their options," he remarked.
"So when we see [stories about] government organizations deciding they will implement ODF, that's not what we see primarily. What we see is, government organizations who will be interested in piloting ODF, and piloting Microsoft Open XML, probably piloting other formats - let's say, PDF/A for archiving. And to do these pilots, they will want partners who can help them across the board. This is where we see interest; but [with regard to] the sole adoption of one format versus another, the feeling we get from our customers is that they're not ready to make that choice yet."
The way WordPerfect will continue to work, he explained, is by processing text and formatting elements in its native format, and then saving in the format of the user's choice. Part of its unique process - perhaps, to this date, WordPerfect's longest running distinguishing feature - is that it can present the user with a raw view of the document, with formatting codes embedded and marked. It's like markup code in HTML, but it's a feature that predates the advent of the Web by several years.
Won't the addition of more new "Save As" formats make it more difficult for WordPerfect's developers to continue to present users with an accurate picture of formatting, especially when revealing raw codes - which remain in "WP" native form?
"I would not say it's not a challenge," Carriere responded, with an intentional double-negative. "It's always been a challenge. If anything, with ODF being an open standard, to which we contributed when it was defined, and Microsoft Open Office XML also being openly documented, at least we don't have to reverse-engineer the formats any more. So if anything, it's not getting easy [or un-] challenging, but it is easier than it used to be."
"The challenge around migrating to XML-based formats is much, much bigger than people would like to believe," Carriere continued. He understands the outcry from some users who have made it literally a political cause to reclaim ownership over the contents of past and present documents, and secure their rights to content they generate in the future. That XML opens up the prospects of open engineering of multiple types of repurposing of content, some ideas for which haven't been created yet, is still fascinating and appealing.
"But the challenges behind it are gigantic," Carriere added. "So meanwhile, whether it is our own formats or other vendors' formats and macros, there will still be demand to view and edit legacy content, there will still be demand to not turn on and off a switch about how your work flows overnight. [So] during a transition period, I'm very comfortable offering a solution that touches on not every alternative, but as many alternatives as possible."
Next: Will WordPerfect adopt a Microsoft-like 'Ribbon?'
It is intresting that the MS format is promoted defensive.
Score: 0
|Corel is making a smart move for once, even though WordPerfect was doomed the day Word 6.0 hit the shelves. And it won't gain market share by copying Microsoft's Ribbon, whatever a court says about that issue in the future. The growing popularity of OpenOffice and sustained user base of Microsoft Office will keep WordPerfect as an anachronism.
But the fact is the OASIS OpenDocument format is a future-proof international standard for office software (ISO/IEC 26300), and it puts StarOffice/OpenOffice in the driver's seat with regard to the stronger file format, notably relative to business, government, and academia.
No matter how much you love Microsoft (I'm not shy about my fanboy fawns), in the face of Microsoft's policy of personal PC intrusion via WGA/OGA, Activation/Validation schemas, open source provides the one thing we all want: CONTROL over our data that is not owned, licensed, sold, and comes complete with a kill-switch by a corporation. I'm not talking about the merits of whether the StarOffice/OpenOffice "suite" is better than MS Office 2007, but rather their respective file formats. Office's OpenXML reinvents the wheel in so many instances that it's really rather silly. One prime example of such meddling is the built-in (or left in?) inaccuracies and incredible blunders to citations in Word 2007 (a caveat to students everywhere not to use that feature).
Score: 0
|Not that what Corel says matters at all, but ODF is a doomed "standard". Why? Because MS has their own and IT will be THE standard. Why? One word:
Office.
End of discussion.
Score: 0
|Microsoft is making Word ODF compatible also so that argument is out the window.
Score: 0
|Probably one of the most clueless comments Ive read in quite some time.
ODF covers spreadsheets, documents, databases, presentations and such.
Office isnt a standard. Office is a suite of applications. Microsoft has funded the development of the plugins to use with its Office suite, and its free and open source (hosted on sourceforge) It will be compatible with every component, making it "comatible" if you will, with the likes of KOffice, StarOffice, OpenOffice, and now WordPefect.
Choice is a beautiful thing.
Score: 0
|The growing popularity of linux on desktop brings openoffice, koffice and other alternatives among everyday users and small businesses.
Why should I pay for software when I just need to send/receive mails, print papers, write texts etc...? I can get all for free!
As an example, we use Openoffice on 17 computers here at work because it gives us all we need. So the money saved on office software has been invested in better equipment.
So ODF has all the chances to become a popular standard. Microsoft will not anymore fully dominate the market of office aplications as it was 5-10 years ago, because users now have the choice, and use what they want to and not what they have to.
IT will not be THE standardm anymore, the time of do(c)mination has come to an end :)
Score: 0
|Via a ten-stage plug-in export process, hardly transparent.
Score: 0
|Like everything Microsoft does.
Score: 0
|