Creative launches its Vado pocket 'camcorder'

By Tim Conneally, BetaNews

May 13, 2008, 6:46 PM

Offering a device for individuals to keep handy just in case a "must record" moment happens ("Don't Taze Me, Bro" moments), Creative has unveiled its VF0570-P Vado Pocket Video Camcorder.

With 2 GB of memory, and 640 x 480 VGA MPEG4 videos recording at 30 fps, Creative's Vado has specs conspicuously similar to PureVideo's 2 GB Flip Video. The main difference between the two is the price. The 2 GB flip carries with it an MSRP of $149.99, while the Vado shaves the price down to $99.99.

Complete with two AA batteries, the unit only weighs 84 grams and claims to be able to record for 2 hours in an even further reduced quality. Like the Flip, there is a built in USB connector, a 2" LCD screen, and an A/V out port.

Though Creative and Pure both bill their devices as "camcorders," the quality offered is only marginally better than the capture quality on better mobile phones. Furthermore, a developing trend among point and shoot still cameras is the addition of HD video capture. Panasonic, Samsung, Kodak, and Canon all offer far superior video capture quality in a comparably-sized unit for only a fraction more money.

Creative Vado Pocket Camcorder

In fact, Kodak's Easyshare V1233 is a 12 megapixel still camera capable of 720p HD video with an MSRP only $50 higher than the Flip Video 2G. It will not take a conscientious shopper long to find retailers that sell that particular camera for only $20 more than Creative's new offering.

Add a Comment (5 Comments)

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By cowboyshootist

edited May 15, 2008 - 7:57 PM

This doesn't use AA batteries. As I understand it the Vado uses a rechargeable and possibly a proprietary one. At least with the Flip you can use rechargeable AAs.

The real question is how do they compare in video quality (given the sub-$150 price point).

Score: 0

By tuhtee

edited May 13, 2008 - 9:51 PM

Now you claim that this "camcorder" is good and all, but how do we know. Remember there are 2 types of cameras we are comparing. 2 minus 1 equals 1 camera which is better. And there are 9 justices on the Supreme Court, 9+1 = 10. Drop the 0 and you get 1? Evidently, all of this boils down to one answer. Get an iPhone with that app which lets you record videos.

I am not Hillary Clinton and I approve this message.

Score: 0

By Ian C.

posted May 14, 2008 - 12:19 AM

You need to install a 3rd party app to do that on iPhone? LOL!!! I can do it natively on my phone, and I got mine for free with a service contract, didn't have to shell out $500.

Score: 0

By Diam0nd

posted May 13, 2008 - 7:06 PM

640 x 480? Is this a joke? My phone got better resolution. Good lord...

Score: 0

By uberfly

posted May 14, 2008 - 4:17 AM

Yea, but remember genius, it's video and it's a whopping $100.00 device.

Score: 0