DRM is added to Flash with new rights management server

By Jacqueline Emigh | Published March 19, 2008, 11:43 AM

With today's rollout of the Adobe Flash Media Rights Management Server, Adobe is unabashedly targeting a product specifically at movie studios, big corporations, and content providers anxious to protect their IP.

But Adobe first adopted digital rights management not too long ago, with the addition of new technologies in Flash Media Server 3 and the Flash 9 player. So how will Media Rights Management Server be any different?

"Flash Media Server 3 has content protection for streaming video over RTMP. But the Media Rights Management Server protects video downloaded in FLV or MPEG4," said John Landwehr, director of Adobe's security solutions strategy, in a briefing for BetaNews "The DRM can continue to work even when you're playing back video offline."

But to make this happen on a desktop or mobile PC or Mac, you can't use a garden variety Flash player. Instead, downloading content from the new DRM server requires installation of either the new Adobe Media Player or a custom video application running on Adobe's recently released AIR software.

So the addition of DRM to the world's biggest Flash video sources, especially YouTube, may not necessarily be in the cards unless for some reason they suddenly want to drop their own recently API-opened video console and adopt Adobe's. Meanwhile, the very reason content providers are intensifying their pressure on Adobe for IP protection of some form, has been the proliferation of nearly untrackable content over YouTube.

Among the content providers already signed on to use Flash Adobe Media Flash Player, however, is Hulu, the NBC/Fox joint venture. Landwehr readily acknowledged that sites such as Hulu have "increased the visibility of Flash video on the Web."

Meanwhile, along with pressure on one side for Adobe to finally adopt DRM as though it's lagged behind, there's a groundswell of opposition to Adobe's steady moves there from the opposite side of the spectrum.

For example, in an article posted on the Electronic Frontier Foundation's Web site, Staff Technologist Seth Schoen argues that Adobe's use of DRM in the Flash server and player "threatens to squash a growing tradition of expressive fair use of online video."

Although Landwehr told BetaNews he hadn't read Schoen's article, he did say the new Media Rights Management Server is designed to "give content owners...content protection as an option.

"This is very important to our customers. But that said, the user experience is also very important. If you don't provide a usable consumer experience, that means people won't watch your content. And this isn't what content providers want, either."

Aside from commercial video producers such as film studios, Media Rights Management Server is also targeted at corporations concerned that training videos or digital footage of company meetings might "accidentally or maliciously leak out" over the Web, he said.

Running on a choice of Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition or Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS or ES 4.0, the new server supports "buy, rent, and ad-supported business models," according to Landwehr.

For Adobe, he maintained, the DRM server represents a tradition of digital content protection and security that began way back in the 1990s with Portable Document Format. On the security side, Media Rights Management Server encrypts content, signs playlists, and associates content with policies specifying viewing rights. It also comes with a built-in service provider interface that developers can use to create authentication and authorization handlers for LDAP and Active Directory.

Available now, Adobe's new Media Rights Management Server is priced at $40,000 per CPU (PDF with full specifications available here). A BEA WebLogic 8.1 application server is required. For strong encryption keys and access controls lists, an Oracle database is also required.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

DRM, Media protection, IP rights, .... why the f*ck even bother Adobe? Wasting millions on trash like this which incidentally nowadays, doesn't even *mitigate* novice users from copying "protected" content. Give up and look for a new model.

Score: 0

|

And just in time too! Just when everyone else is looking to get away from DRM, Adobe is rushing in.

Score: 0

|

Obviously not everyone else is looking to get away from DRM, otherwise Adobe wouldn't be rushing in. They are providing a service for those that may want to utilise the service.

As mentioned in the article, the content providers - such as private companies recording digital footage of private meetings, for example, are looking to find a way to track 'leaks' of their content on sites such as YouTube - Fair do's to them.

I doubt, given the groundswell of opinion opposed to it, whether it'll be as successful as they may hope for - especially in relation to the movie studios - but no-one can argue with Adobe making the service available for those that want it.

Any arguments against DRM should be with the content providers still trying to inflict DRM on us, in one form or another, on the products we purchase/rent.

Adobe is merely selling the mechanism for them to do it, if they so choose.

Score: 0

|

Why don't they get it? All these DRM can easily recode and distribute freely. They just want to make it difficult for the one who actually paying.

Just like MS WGA, pirate never has any problem by passing it.

Score: 0

|

Good points. I had my eyes on the wrong game, thinking mostly of music and movie protection. Business intellectual property would make sense, at least as far as Adobe (or anyone) looking to capitalize on the interest.

Score: 0

|

ARRG!

Score: 0

|

Microsoft's Bob Muglia and Ray Ozzie on Silverlight vs. standards

Bob Muglia: "We're trying to provide people with an environment that has capabilities that you just simply can't do today in the standards-based world."

Sony looks to finally open a single storefront for downloads

Sony has had many different download portals for movies, music, e-books, and games, and now it's looking to make a single shop for all of it.

PDC 2009: What have we learned this week?

There was the freebie that no one will forget, the heebie-jeebies courtesy of Scott Guthrie, and a teensy bit clearer picture of how this cloud thingie should work.

Tuning out the tablet: Time to give the endless speculation a rest

Wide Angle Zoom: Wishing and hoping and thinking and praying....won't put an iTablet on the market.

Microsoft's .NET Micro Framework is now free and open source

The latest version of Microsoft's .NET Micro framework is now in the hands of the FOSS community.

Google's value proposition for Chrome OS: Should we feel insulted?

For a search engine that has direct access to all the world's online history, it appears to have taught Google nothing about selling a machine.

E-book readers will be in short supply this holiday season

E-readers are hot this year, and a lot of compelling new products have been released, but are there enough electrophoretic displays to go around?

Five improvements for IT managers in 2010

If businesses are to improve their efficiency for next year, they need to stop and reassess the basic tenets of their job.

Live report: Will Google Chrome OS change Linux?

The mysteries of just what Chrome OS is, and how much of an operating system it truly is, may be resolved today.

AOL's spinoff from Time Warner to shed 2,500 jobs

As AOL moves toward become an independent company again, it will cut nearly a third of its workforce.

PDC 2009: Microsoft cares about Web browser performance

The effort to give users of the world's dominant Web browser the impression of quality, is a personal one for the man who leads that battle.