Despite an announcement, 'Kilimanjaro' may not be the next SQL Server

By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published October 7, 2008, 5:19 PM

There's a difference between building a new database engine, and building tools that are bundled with an existing database engine for a new product. So even analysts may be surprised to learn the next SQL Server is not two years away.

At a conference in Seattle yesterday that was apparently accompanied by at least one demo that was not on its original schedule, Microsoft made mention of a product with the code-name "Kilimanjaro," in association with SQL Server.

Since "Katmai" was the code-name for the last release that just made it out the door -- albeit six months later than hoped -- there was immediate assumption that Kilimanjaro (a taller mountain) would refer to the next version of SQL Server. It didn't help that a Microsoft press release referred to two new business intelligence features being developed for SQL Server, using the following phrase: "Upcoming in the next release of Microsoft SQL Server focused on BI -- code-named 'Kilimanjaro."'

The phrase is accurate, if you understand that the code-name refers to the BI features, not the database.

Within minutes, both bloggers and reporters seized upon the phrase as though the company had actually offered a peek at some sort of "SQL Server 2010," and some had actually reported that a database engine for two years down the road had actually been demoed.

The confusion rose to such a level that some of Microsoft's own developers associated with the real Kilimanjaro project actually found themselves correcting their company's own public relations. Andrew Fryer, an evangelist with Microsoft UK's Developer & Platform Group, wrote this afternoon, "Kilimanjaro is a bigger mountain than Katmai, but the project is not the next release of SQL Server 2008, it's a BI set of features that integrate into SQL Server and comprises two projects that you may have heard about."

Those two projects include one called Project "Madison" (yes, another code-name), which is the culmination of a technology that Microsoft acquired just last July, in the buyout of a firm called DATAllegro. It's a data warehouse (DW) technology that compresses the tools needed to make major queries of huge repositories of data. Attendees at Monday's show report having seen a demo of Madison which successfully ran a query that returned one trillion (that's with a "t") records from a 100 TB database, using ordinary PCs in mere seconds.

The other is a concept called "Gemini" which is a set of analytics and reporting tools that will enable individuals to get a more insightful read about the contents of large, dynamic databases. Microsoft customer advisory team member Richard Tkachuk attended a demo of Gemini presented by Principal Program Manager Donald Farmer.

In his blog yesterday, Tkachuk wrote that Farmer "started with 20 million rows in memory on a no-frills PC and built a model from scratch. Even with 20 million rows, interactive ordering, filtering and windowing and pivoting was instantaneous. It's difficult to compare how much simpler it is building a model with actual data than it is building one with abstractions and not seeing the result at the end. You might remember the days before WYSIWYG when documents were built with formatting and font codes and not seeing how it would look until it hit the printer. This is doing the same thing to data analysis with non-trivial amounts of data -- WYSIWA (what-you-see-is-what-you-analyze)...And -- this bears repeating -- it's all in Excel."

It does indeed bear repeating: It's an Excel add-on. It's due to be packaged along with a business intelligence version of SQL Server 2008, currently slated for 2010.

So why does the distinction matter? If there were a new version of SQL Server slated for as soon as 16 months away, the beta cycle for it would need to start...about now.

"Like a lot of conference announcements none of this is going to be ready for some time and even the earliest betas are a long way away," wrote Microsoft UK's Andrew Fryer, "so the only impact it should have on deployments today is that this will just add more useful stuff to the BI projects built on SQL Server."

Among the first Internet sources to correct the mistaken report were independent blogs whose interest in the non-existent next beta may have led them directly to the bad news. In one case, the correction was accompanied by a :-( sad-face emoticon.

Update banner (stretched)

5:35 pm EDT October 7, 2008 - The official clarification from Microsoft this afternoon is that Kilimanjaro is being called a "new release" of SQL Server 2008, but not a new database engine. What is added to it will not replace or upgrade any portion of the current database management system, a senior Microsoft product manager told BetaNews this afternoon.

"What we are announcing this week is a release of SQL Server code-named 'Kilimanjaro' focused on BI and delivering new capabilities in the area of self-self service analysis and self-service reporting," reads an e-mail we received from Fausto Ibarra, Microsoft's director of product management for SQL Server. "These are new capabilities and not a rewrite, rework, or upgrade. SQL Server Kilimanjaro will ship in H1 calendar year 2010, and we will continue to commit to a major release of SQL Server every 24-36 months."

It's an interesting tightrope Microsoft has chosen to walk, in that the company is now officially stating that it can issue a "major release" of SQL Server, if not any other product specifically, without actually changing the basic product. Granted, the add-ons are important and should be well-received, but in this new reality, we can expect to see something more like a "SQL Server 2008 R2" with some advanced features tied on.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

Maybe this mess should highlight to Microsoft (and other software devs) that having a well publicised product roadmap (see Intel's) is a good thing.

Score: 0

|

PDC 2009: What have we learned this week?

There was the freebie that no one will forget, the heebie-jeebies courtesy of Scott Guthrie, and a teensy bit clearer picture of how this cloud thingie should work.

Live report: Will Google Chrome OS change Linux?

The mysteries of just what Chrome OS is, and how much of an operating system it truly is, may be resolved today.

PDC 2009: Microsoft cares about Web browser performance

The effort to give users of the world's dominant Web browser the impression of quality, is a personal one for the man who leads that battle.

Nokia re-affirms its commitment to Symbian, sort of

Maemo won't necessarily be replacing Symbian in the Nokia N-Series, but that's definitely a place where it will be found.

E-book readers will be in short supply this holiday season

E-readers are hot this year, and a lot of compelling new products have been released, but are there enough electrophoretic displays to go around?

Sony looks to finally open a single storefront for downloads

Sony has had many different download portals for movies, music, e-books, and games, and now it's looking to make a single shop for all of it.

Tuning out the tablet: Time to give the endless speculation a rest

Wide Angle Zoom: Wishing and hoping and thinking and praying....won't put an iTablet on the market.

Five improvements for IT managers in 2010

If businesses are to improve their efficiency for next year, they need to stop and reassess the basic tenets of their job.

AOL's spinoff from Time Warner to shed 2,500 jobs

As AOL moves toward become an independent company again, it will cut nearly a third of its workforce.

Gartner: SMS-based money transfer will be bigger than mobile browsing, search

Gartner issues its predictions for the 10 things our phones will be doing in 2012.

Don't forget to upgrade to Firefox 3.6 beta 3 today

Mozilla has released the latest beta its Firefox 3.6 browser software, just over one week after beta 2.