Dueling Interop Labs: Microsoft Opens One with Novell, Another with Sun

By Scott M. Fulton, III | Published September 12, 2007, 3:37 PM

Yesterday, Microsoft and Novell announced they were moving in together - at least insofar as their joint development work was concerned, into a modest 2,500 square-foot laboratory in Cambridge, Mass. "The first priority for the lab team will be to ensure interoperability between Microsoft and Novell virtualization technologies," reads yesterday's statement from Microsoft.

Then comes today, with Microsoft making nice with its friends at Sun Microsystems. They too will open up an interop laboratory...or so they said during a press conference this afternoon. However, reporters who were already familiar with the Novell development yesterday wondered, where will this Sun lab be located? Will it be in Cambridge? Will it be bigger or smaller? And perhaps most importantly, why isn't there just one lab?

"There are different locations," responded Microsoft corporate vice president Andrew Lees, acknowledging the Novell lab in Cambridge will be working on a fairly separate track. Then realizing that Microsoft had already said the Cambridge lab would be devoted to virtualization, and the Sun lab would be devoted to virtualization...Lees tried to find a way to, shall we say, interoperate the two methodologies without contradicting himself...too much.

"Some of the technologies may end up being common, like virtualization - a fairly cross-cutting piece of technology," added Lees. "This agreement that we're talking about today includes the interoperability and the virtualization, but really also perhaps the biggest part of it in many respects is the collaboration we're doing as part of the OEM agreement for Windows Server."

Last June, Microsoft appointed Tom Hanrahan of its existing Open Source Software Lab to run the Novell effort. Yesterday for his Port 25 blog, Hanrahan wrote, "Those of us who work at the lab have strived over the past few months to create an environment that is not strictly Microsoft and not strictly Novell. We've successfully created a unique entity, a development lab, at which there resides a single team of engineers whose individuals are involved in and supportive of each others' work."

But while Microsoft's efforts with Novell and Microsoft's efforts with Sun may not necessarily be one party's or the other's exclusively, Lees made clear today the two efforts are not mutual, particularly because one deals with SUSE Enterprise Linux and the other with Solaris. They are thus two very different tracks. His implication was that across-the-board interoperability is a purely Microsoft-oriented goal, thus any lab that would push Windows interoperability as its main objective would be more Microsoft-centered than it should actually be.

"The number of people [in the Sun lab] will increase and decrease depending on exactly what projects we have," Lees stated today in response to a question from a Gartner analyst. "We have a minimum staff, and that will probably increase over time. We'll have a lab here directly in Redmond on Microsoft's premises that will have some hardware on it and some engineers; and depending on what we're working on, which customer situations, exactly what level of testing, we expect different people will use that. It becomes a resource and a focal point for how the companies can work together effectively to solve those customers' problems."

Lees declined to answer whether a similar site would be opened on Sun's premises, though Sun Executive Vice President John Fowler added that his company would also contribute to solving interop problems at the customer level by installing Windows on servers in its own customer centers.

Comments

View comments by with a score of at least

Embrace and Destroy, part III

Score: 0

|

Mind how you go up there in Deliverance country.

Score: 0

|

Will Firefox beat IE9 to Direct2D rendering?

Just days after Microsoft executives gave conference attendees a peek at a new rendering technology, a Mozilla contributor revealed he's working on the same thing.

AOL's decision to rebrand as Aol. takes a bad brand and makes it worse

The idea behind the social Web is to crowd source before bringing out something new. But not at AOL, which new logo debuted with a cry of "fail!" across the blogosphere and Twittersphere today.

Microsoft's Bob Muglia and Ray Ozzie on Silverlight vs. standards

Bob Muglia: "We're trying to provide people with an environment that has capabilities that you just simply can't do today in the standards-based world."

Uh-oh, netbooks -- not Windows 7 -- will lift 2009 PC sales

Santa may bring a lump of coal to the Windows PC industry this holiday season. Netbook sales will sap PC margins, while weak Windows 7 PC sales could further drive down average selling prices.

A case study in improving software: What Office 2010 can learn from Notion 3

A music composition product gambles with a complete overhaul, in an effort to make headway against two well-known competitors in a tough market.

Kindle 2 update adds battery life, native PDF reader

Amazon has pushed out an update to the Kindle 2 e-reader that lengthens battery life and adds a native PDF viewer.

Safari on iPhone gets competition from a $1 browser app

Apple likes to say it gives iPhone users a full browsing experience, but a new competitor tries to incorporate more desktop browser features.

Action Replay maker sues Microsoft for Xbox 360 'predatory technological barriers'

Third-party video game accessory maker Datel has filed an antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft over the Xbox 360's recent Dashboard update.

Where there's smoke: Apple warranty stance raises troubling questions

Carmi Levy | Wide Angle Zoom: Smoking can be dangerous not only for your lungs, it appears, but for your Apple hardware warranty.

Microsoft's .NET Micro Framework is now free and open source

The latest version of Microsoft's .NET Micro framework is now in the hands of the FOSS community.

Google's value proposition for Chrome OS: Should we feel insulted?

For a search engine that has direct access to all the world's online history, it appears to have taught Google nothing about selling a machine.